XGC is believed to be an uncommon form of inflammatory disease of the gallbladder. The condition is characterized histologically by varying degrees of a chronic or acute inflammatory cell infiltration, as well as many macrophages containing lipids, and fibrosis during the later stages
1–14). It mainly affects middle-aged women with gallstones
3, 7, 9, 13). There is a paucity of reports on the overall incidence of XGC, though there are several reports on selected cases
3, 7, 11). Retrospective estimates of the occurrence of XGC in large studies with surgically resected gallbladders range from 1.3% to 5.2%
4, 9, 11), while the incidence appears to be somewhat higher in the Indian population
3). The pathogenesis of this lesion is not well understood, although it is believed that a rupture of the Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses with extravasation of bile in the interstitial tissues and consequent xanthogranulomatous inflammatory reaction are the initial causes
11, 13, 14). In general, XGC presents a variety of patterns ranging from minute xanthogranuloma foci to mass formation in the center of the gallbladder. Occasionally, the lesion is associated with tumor formation, and adhesions to the adjacent organs may give rise to a suspicion of a malignant neoplasm
3, 5, 7, 8, 11–13). The relationship between XGC and a carcinoma of the gallbladder is unclear. It may simply be that XGC and adenocarcinoma are both complications of cholelithiasis and cholecystitis of a particular duration or degree, or that tissue disruption by a carcinoma facilitates the entry of bile into the stroma
15). As in the present case, an obstruction of the cystic duct by a neoplasm may also initiate the histiocytic inflammatory process of XGC
1). The association is important because when both lesions are present in the same specimen, the carcinoma may be overlooked altogether, or the extent of the tumor over- or under-estimated. Prior to a pathologic diagnosis, XGC is occasionally difficult to differentiate from gallbladder cancer, and several studies have been performed to solve this problem. Krishnani et al. reported that fine-needle aspiration cytology plays an important role in making a preoperative diagnosis of gallbladder mass lesions, especially coexistent lesions
1). Yoshida et al. also studied the clinical factors in order to differentiate XGC from cancer. They found that findings of a nonvisualized gallbladder on cholangiography and cholelithiasis in combination and an operative aspirate of pus or nothing from within the gallbladder favor the diagnosis of an XGC over carcinoma
4). Unfortunately, their findings were not consistent with those of our case.
In conclusion, although XGC is not believed to be a premalignant lesion, not only can XGC imitate a carcinoma in various ways, it can also be associated with a primary adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder
1, 3, 13, 15, 16). Furthermore, it is difficult to make a preoperative differentiation between the two lesions. Therefore, it is important to be aware of the possible coexistence of XGC and cancer in the same gallbladder.