Effects of statin use on serum creatinine phosphokinase levels in normal thyroid function

Jeonghoon Ha; Joonyub Lee; Jin Yu; Hakyoung Park; Jiwon Shinn; Seung-Hwan Lee; Jae-Hyoung Cho; Hun-Sung Kim

doi:10.3904/kjim.2024.085

Korean J Intern Med > Volume 39(4); 2024 > Article

Ha, Lee, Yu, Park, Shinn, Lee, Cho, and Kim: Effects of statin use on serum creatinine phosphokinase levels in normal thyroid function

Original Article

Endocrinology-metabolism

The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2024;39(4):650-658.

Published online: June 24, 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2024.085

Effects of statin use on serum creatinine phosphokinase levels in normal thyroid function

Jeonghoon Ha¹, Joonyub Lee¹, Jin Yu¹, Hakyoung Park², Jiwon Shinn², Seung-Hwan Lee¹, Jae-Hyoung Cho¹, Hun-Sung Kim^1,²

¹Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea

²Department of Medical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to: Hun-Sung Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Medical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, 222 Banpo-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06591, Korea Tel: +82-2-3147-8425, Fax: +82-0504-292-9080, E-mail: 01cadiz@hanmail.net

Received March 11, 2024 Revised April 2, 2024 Accepted April 8, 2024

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background/Aims

Statins are common lipid-lowering agents used in dyslipidemia. However, they increase serum creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) levels. Currently, there are no studies on the effect of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels on CPK levels after statin administration. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate CPK level alterations after statin administration according to TSH quartiles in participants with euthyroidism.

Methods

This retrospective analysis included 25,047 patients with euthyroidism. CPK levels were measured before and 6 months after statin administration. Normal TSH levels were divided into four quartiles, and the CPK levels and proportions of patients with normal CPK levels after statin administration for each TSH quartile were evaluated.

Results

The baseline CPK level was significantly higher in the lowest TSH quartile (Q1) compared to the other quartiles but decreased after statin administration. Thus, the difference between the CPK levels and the other quartile groups was not significant. The proportion of patients with normal CPK levels was also significantly lowest in Q1 before statin administration; however, no significant difference was noted in the ratio among each group after statin administration. These findings were consistent with the findings of the analysis according to statin intensity.

Conclusions

In patients in the lowest TSH quartile of the normal TSH range, the CPK level decreased, and the proportion of normal CPK levels increased significantly after statin administration. However, similar changes were not observed in other TSH quartiles. Therefore, further studies are required to mechanistically confirm these conclusions.

Keywords: Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors; Hypothyroidism; Thyrotropin

Graphical abstract

INTRODUCTION

Statins, also known as hydroxymethylglutaryl reductase inhibitors, are commonly prescribed lipid-lowering agents to treat dyslipidemia in Korea [1,2]. Besides statins’ lipid-lowering effects, they are therapeutic agents that help prevent the side effects of arteriosclerotic diseases, including stroke and myocardial infarction [3]. Statins also have anti-inflammatory [4,5], antithrombotic [6,7], and immunomodulatory activities [8,9] and can improve endothelial function [10,11]. Despite these benefits, statins increase serum creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) levels, leading to myopathy and in severe cases, rhabdomyolysis [12,13]. High-dose statins may increase the risk of myopathy, especially in patients with comorbidities or in the presence of interacting medications, such as diltiazem [14]. Statins should be discontinued if an elevated CPK level is found or myopathy is suspected [15].

Most studies on thyroid function and CPK changes after statin administration have investigated patients with prevalent thyroid dysfunction. Hypothyroidism is related to CPK elevation after statin administration [16], and CPK elevation in statin-administered patients is correlated with hypothyroidism [17,18]. Although most statin users are euthyroid, to the best of our knowledge, no study has examined the effect of statins on CPK elevation in patients with normal thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels.

Therefore, this study primarily aimed to investigate the changes in CPK levels after statin administration according to TSH quartiles in participants with euthyroidism and to explore these changes according to statin intensity. Clinically, the changes in CPK level according to TSH level are crucial; therefore, we determined the clinical significance of this parameter. This study secondarily aimed to identify the “proportion of normal CPK” or “proportion of abnormal CPK.” Although these two analyses do not appear to be related, we believe that they should be performed concurrently in clinical settings.

METHODS

Study population

Patients who received statins for the first time (statin-naïve participants) (n = 36,246) at the Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital between June 2009 and June 2018 were included in the study. After excluding patients with thyroid cancer (n = 1,577), subclinical hypothyroidism or hypothyroidism (n = 254), subclinical hyperthyroidism or hyperthyroidism (n = 175), and no CPK results (n = 9,193), a total of 25,047 patients with euthyroidism were included in the analysis (Fig. 1). The patients were divided into four groups according to TSH quartiles, and changes in CPK levels were retrospectively compared and analyzed among groups after 6 months of statin administration (Fig. 1). The normal range of TSH level was 0.58–4.78 μIU/mL, and was divided into the following quartiles: Q1, 0.58–1.062 μIU/mL; Q2, 1.063–1.776 μIU/mL; Q3, 1.777–2.802 μIU/mL; and Q4, 2.803–4.78 μIU/mL. Low- (pravastatin, 10 and 20 mg), moderate- (rosuvastatin, 5 and 10 mg; atorvastatin, 10 and 20 mg; pitavastatin, 2 and 4 mg; fluvastatin, 80 mg; and simvastatin, 20 and 40 mg), and high- (rosuvastatin, 20 mg, and atorvastatin, 40 mg) intensity statins were administered, depending on the patient’s condition, preference, and target low-density lipoprotein (LDL) level. Statin intensity was classified based on the practice guidelines suggested by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association [19]. Daily administration of low-, moderate-, and high-intensity statin therapies lowered LDL levels, on average, by < 30%, 30–50%, and ≥ 50%, respectively. The requirement for informed consent was waived owing to the retrospective nature of this study. This study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Catholic Medical Center (approval number: KC22RISI0016).

Measurements

Patient data, including anthropometric measurements and blood chemistry test results, were collected. Blood samples were collected after overnight fasting to evaluate serum glucose, CPK, total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, free thyroxine, and TSH levels. All measurements were performed using a Hitachi 7600 autoanalyzer (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at the central laboratory of Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital. The triglyceride and total and LDL cholesterol levels were measured using enzymatic assays, and the HDL cholesterol levels were measured using the selective inhibition method. The free thyroxine and TSH levels were measured by enzyme immunoassay using a commercially available IRMA kit (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). The normal range of serum CPK levels was ≤ 200 U/L.

Data privacy and protection and statistical analyses

The data extracted in this study were stored as an encrypted file on the research director’s encrypted computer, which could only be accessed by the principal researcher. For statistical analyses, all personal information was deleted, pseudonymized, and anonymized. In this study, the sample size was considered to be sufficient; therefore, the analysis was conducted under the assumption that population normality was followed without a normality test. Continuous variables are expressed as means ± standard deviations and compared using t-tests. p values were calculated using correlation analysis for continuous variables and the chi-square test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used for correlation analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics

Differences in baseline characteristics among the groups are presented in Table 1. The mean age of the patients was 60.1 ± 3.4 years, and 43.8% were females. The mean LDL cholesterol level was 123.9 ± 44.4 mg/dL, and there were no significant differences in lipid profile among the groups. The mean CPK level was 150.0 ± 33.5 U/L; however, it was highest (198.4 ± 63.1 U/L) in Q1 and lowest (127.3 ± 26.5 U/L) in Q4 (p < 0.001). The mean CPK level at follow-up was 115.7 ± 85.4 U/L; however, there were no significant differences in follow-up CPK levels among groups (p = 0.700). Moderate-intensity statins were prescribed most frequently in all groups. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of comorbidities among the quartiles.

Changes in CPK levels according to TSH quartiles before and after statin administration

A comparison of CPK levels by TSH quartiles before and after statin administration is illustrated in Fig. 2. At baseline, a significant difference was observed in CPK values by quartile (p < 0.001), but no significant difference was noted at 6 months later (Fig. 2A). In the analysis according to the intensity of the statin, there was a tendency for a difference in CPK value by quartile in the baseline for low-intensity statins, but no statistical difference was noted (p = 0.213) (Fig. 2B). However, for moderate-intensity statin (Fig. 2C) and high-intensity statin (Fig. 2D), a significant difference was observed in CPK values by quartile at baseline (all p < 0.001), but this difference was not significant at 6 months later.

Changes in the proportion of patients with normal CPK levels according to TSH quartiles before and after statin administration

A comparison of the proportion of patients with normal CPK levels (≤ 200 U/L) according to statin intensity before and after statin administration is illustrated in Fig. 3. Regardless of statin intensity, there was a significant difference among the groups in the proportion of patients with normal CPK levels before statin administration (p < 0.001, Fig. 3A). However, this difference among the groups after statin administration was not significant (Fig. 3A). A similar pattern was observed in the analysis by statin intensity. The proportion of patients with normal CPK levels in the low-, moderate-, and high-intensity statin groups was significantly the lowest in Q1; however, there was no difference among the groups in the percentage of patients with normal CPK levels after statin administration (Fig. 3B-D). In the high-statin intensity group, the patient group with normal CPK levels before statin administration was the lowest at 77.1% in Q1, however, the rate increased the most after statin administration at 88.6% (p < 0.001, Fig. 3D).

DISCUSSION

In this study, the effect of statin administration on CPK levels in patients with euthyroidism according to TSH quartiles was retrospectively investigated. In the lowest TSH quartile (Q1), the mean CPK level decreased, and the proportion of patients with normal CPK levels increased after statin administration. This change was observed regardless of statin intensity. However, in the other quartile groups, statin administration did not significantly alter the CPK levels.

Since hypothyroidism, typically characterized by elevated TSH, is associated with increased CPK levels, which are a side effect of statin therapy, it prompts the question of whether there is a connection between variations in TSH and CPK levels following statin therapy. However, thyroid function can have various clinical implications depending on the levels of FT4 and TSH. Furthermore, there are contradictory reports on the relationship between changes in TSH and CPK levels after statin administration, depending on whether the hypothyroidism is overt or subclinical. Most studies on hypothyroidism and CPK elevation with statin administration have analyzed patients with untreated overt hypothyroidism. According to previous reports, statin administration in patients with hypothyroidism can lead to mild CPK elevation [20,21], and profound elevation or even overt rhabdomyolysis, although rare, occurs [22–24]. The pathogenesis of hypothyroidism-induced changes in CPK levels is entirely fully understood. In hypothyroidism, CPK clearance decreases, and muscle cell permeability may be altered, leading to increased CPK levels [13]. Therefore, patients with hypothyroidism should be converted to a euthyroid state before initiating statin therapy [20]. Several studies have investigated the association between statin administration and myopathy or CPK elevation in subclinical hypothyroidism. Beyer et al. [16] reported a correlation between CPK and TSH levels and an association with CPK elevation under statin administration in subclinical hypothyroidism. Ahn et al. [23] reported that a 63-year-old woman with subclinical hypothyroidism developed rhabdomyolysis after statin administration. However, this is the first study to examine the association between statin administration and changes in CPK levels according to TSH quartiles within the normal TSH range. Even in a euthyroid state, where both FT4 and TSH levels fall within the normal range, we found that low TSH levels were associated with favorable alterations in CPK levels following statin administration. However, the exact mechanism underpinning this association remains unclear. Moreover, the significant difference in CPK levels according to quartiles, even at normal TSH levels, should be continuously considered in the future.

Skeletal muscle is a target organ for thyroid hormones, and impaired muscle metabolism has been reported in subclinical hypothyroidism [25,26]. A positive correlation between CPK and TSH levels in subclinical hypothyroidism has also been reported [16]. Thus, further studies are required to determine whether the low TSH range, even the normal TSH range, has a favorable effect on muscle metabolism. In this study, the CPK level was the highest in TSH_Q1, even in the normal TSH range. Although baseline CPK levels significantly differed by quartiles, there was no difference after 6 months. Therefore, it is difficult to determine a clinical value to the change in CPK levels according to statin prescription in the normal TSH range with this result alone. However, it was possible to indirectly infer that the risk of CPK elevation would be low, at least in the case of TSH_Q1 in the normal TSH range. Thus, future in-depth studies are required to confirm these findings.

Strengths and limitations

CPK elevation varies according to statin intensity [27]. In a recent network meta-analysis of 153,000 patients, elevated CPK levels or myalgia occurred more frequently in a high-intensity therapy group than in a moderate-intensity therapy group [28]. However, Bae et al. [29] reported that short-term adverse effects of statins were rare in Korean patients, and CPK elevation was observed in only 1.2% of patients. However, in this study, in patients with normal TSH levels, the proportion of patients with abnormal CPK levels did not increase after statin administration according to statin intensity, and there was no significant difference among quartiles. Even in the lowest quartile group (Q1), the normal CPK level increased significantly after statin administration. Further studies are required to understand the cause of the favorable effect of the lower normal TSH status on CPK level normalization after statin administration.

This study has some limitations. First, because of the cross-sectional study design, explaining the causal association was difficult. Retrospective cohort studies show correlation rather than causation, further making it challenging to explain the causal association in this study. Consideration of TSH levels can influence CPK levels. It is important to account for changes in TSH when analyzing the changes in CPK levels. However, in this study, the changes in TSH associated with the CPK levels were not investigated. Therefore, additional prospective studies are required to understand the obvious causal relationship in the future. Second, we could not confirm that we objectively assessed adherence, even in patients with regular follow-ups. Moreover, risk factors for CPK elevation after statin administration, such as alcohol consumption and excessive physical activity [30], could not be identified. This is a limitation of electronic medical record-based retrospective cohort studies [31,32]. There is also limited consideration of clinical variables, such as the participant’s underlying medical conditions or medications. It may be necessary to assess the impact of these clinical variables on CPK levels. A prospective study based on the results of this study will be required. Thirdly, muscle-related symptoms may hold greater clinical significance than CPK elevation following statin therapy. Thus, while checking CPK levels is crucial, assessing the occurrence of muscle symptoms post-statin use is equally important. However, a limitation of the retrospective study was its failure to analyze the associated symptoms. Finally, the follow-up duration was relatively short at 6 months. However, as statin-associated symptoms usually occur < 4 weeks after statin initiation [33], 6 months is sufficient to investigate any changes in serum CPK levels after statin administration.

To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first large-scale analysis of 25,074 patients to evaluate the association between statin administration and changes in CPK levels in patients with normal TSH levels. In the lowest TSH quartile of the normal TSH range, the mean CPK levels decreased, and the proportion of patients with normal CPK levels increased significantly after statin administration. However, there was no difference in CPK levels before and after statin administration in other quartiles. This was consistent with the findings of the analysis performed according to statin intensity. Further investigation is required to determine whether low TSH levels within a normal TSH range indicate a favorable effect on CPK clearance and muscle metabolism.

KEY MESSAGE

1. Statin administration impacts CPK levels diversely based on TSH quartiles in euthyroid individuals.

2. Following statin therapy, there is a notable significant decrease within the lowest TSH quartile, accompanied by a significant increase in the proportion of patients with normal CPK levels.

3. Clinically, measuring TSH levels before statin administration may be necessary, as the extent of CPK changes following statin therapy could be influenced by TSH levels.

Notes

CRedit authorship contributions

Jeonghoon Ha: conceptualization, methodology, data curation, formal analysis, validation, software, writing - original draft, visualization; Joonyub Lee: data curation, formal analysis; Jin Yu: data curation, formal analysis; Hakyoung Park: data curation, formal analysis; Jiwon Shinn: data curation, formal analysis; Seung-Hwan Lee: writing - review & editing; Jae-Hyoung Cho: writing - review & editing; Hun-Sung Kim: conceptualization, methodology, resources, investigation, data curation, formal analysis, validation, writing - original draft, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition

Conflicts of interest

The authors disclose no conflicts.

Funding

This research was supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2019M3E5D3073104).

Figure 1

Flow diagram presenting study participant enrollment. CPK, creatinine phosphokinase; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone.

Figure 2

Changes in CPK levels according to TSH quartiles before and after statin administration. CPK, creatinine phosphokinase; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone; ANOVA, analysis of variance. Tukey’s honest significance difference test was applied for post-hoc analysis. *p < 0.05 compared with Q2, Q3, and Q4 by one-way ANOVA and post-hoc analysis.

Figure 3

Changes in the proportion of patients with normal CPK levels according to TSH quartiles before and after statin administration. CPK, creatinine phosphokinase; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone; ANOVA, analysis of variance. Tukey’s honest significance difference test was applied for post-hoc analysis (before), with p < 0.05 compared with the initial value (after). *p < 0.05 compared with Q2, Q3, and Q4 by one-way ANOVA and post-hoc analysis.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study population

Variable	Total (n = 25,047)	TSH quartiles^a)				p value
Variable	Total (n = 25,047)	Q1 (n = 6,265)	Q2 (n = 6,260)	Q3 (n = 6,265)	Q4 (n = 6,257)	p value
Age (yr)	60.1 ± 3.4	60.1 ± 3.6	59.4 ± 3.4	60.1 ± 3.3	60.8 ± 3.4	NS
Female	10,979 (43.8)	2,666 (42.6)	2,710 (43.3)	2,750 (43.9)	2,853 (45.6)	NS
BMI (kg/m²)	24.5 ± 3.7	24.5 ± 3.5	24.6 ± 3.7	24.6 ± 3.7	24.4 ± 3.8	NS
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)	130.3 ± 19.2	129.4 ± 19.7	130.4 ± 18.6	130.2 ± 18.6	131.0 ± 19.7	NS
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)	74.7 ± 12.3	74.3 ± 12.7	74.8 ± 12.0	74.9 ± 12.0	74.8 ± 12.4	NS
Fasting glucose (mg/dL)	125.6 ± 7.2	122.5 ± 8.3	125.5 ± 7.0	123.1 ± 5.4	121.1 ± 3.8	NS
HbA1c (%)	6.7 ± 1.9	6.8 ± 1.9	6.8 ± 2.0	6.7 ± 1.8	6.7 ± 1.7	NS
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)	197.7 ± 55.4	190.9 ± 53.7	198.4 ± 54.2	199.8 ± 55.2	201.7 ± 57.7	NS
Triglyceride (mg/dL)	144.1 ± 108.2	138.3 ± 105.6	144.9 ± 107.3	145.9 ± 108.9	147.4 ± 111.0	NS
HDL cholesterol (mg/dL)	46.5 ± 13.7	45.4 ± 13.4	46.5 ± 13.6	47.0 ± 13.6	47.1 ± 14.0	NS
LDL cholesterol (mg/dL)	123.9 ± 44.4	123.3 ± 43.7	122.7 ± 43.3	123.3 ± 44.3	124.2 ± 46.1	NS
CPK (U/L)	150.0 ± 33.5	198.4 ± 63.1^*	145.2 ± 44.2	129.1 ± 29.2	127.3 ± 26.5	< 0.001
Follow-up CPK (U/L)	115.7 ± 85.4	118.4 ± 39.5	112.3 ± 66.3	109.1 ± 53.5	123.0 ± 93.1	NS
Statin intensity						NS
Low	1,014 (4.1)	196 (3.1)	269 (4.3)	272 (4.3)	277 (4.4)
Moderate	18,210 (81.9)	4,945 (79.0)	5,132 (82.0)	5,153 (82.3)	5,290 (84.6)
High	3,513 (14.0)	1,124 (17.9)	859 (13.7)	840 (13.4)	690 (11.0)
Comorbidity
Hypertension	10,772 (43.0)	2,720 (43.4)	2,579 (41.2)	2,732 (43.6)	2,741 (43.8)	NS
Cardiovascular disease	10,586 (42.3)	3,032 (48.4)	2,586 (41.3)	2,531 (40.4)	2,437 (38.9)	NS
Diabetes	8,720 (34.8)	2,271 (36.2)	2,172 (34.7)	2,150 (34.3)	2,127 (34.0)	NS

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or number (weighted %).

BMI, body mass index; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; CPK, creatinine phosphokinase; NS, nonspecific.

^a) Q1, 0.58–1.062 uIU/mL; Q2, 1.063–1.776 uIU/mL; Q3, 1.777–2.802 uIU/mL; and Q4, 2.803–4.78 uIU/mL.

p values are calculated using correlation analysis for continuous variables and the chi-square test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables.

^* p value < 0.05 compared with Q2, Q3, and Q4 by one-way analysis of variance and post-hoc analysis.

REFERENCES

1. Yang YS, Lee SY, Kim JS, et al. Achievement of LDL-C targets defined by ESC/EAS (2011) guidelines in risk-stratified Korean patients with dyslipidemia receiving lipid-modifying treatments. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2020;35:367–376.

2. Son KB, Bae S. Patterns of statin utilisation for new users and market dynamics in South Korea: a 13-year retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2019;9:e026603.

3. Amarenco P, Labreuche J, Lavallse P, Touboul PJ. Statins in stroke prevention and carotid atherosclerosis: systematic review and up-to-date meta-analysis. Stroke 2004;35:2902– 2909.

4. Montecucco F, Burger F, Pelli G, et al. Statins inhibit C-reactive protein-induced chemokine secretion, ICAM-1 upregulation and chemotaxis in adherent human monocytes. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009;48:233–242.

5. Jain MK, Ridker PM. Anti-inflammatory effects of statins: clinical evidence and basic mechanisms. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2005;4:977–987.

6. Owens AP 3rd, Mackman N. The antithrombotic effects of statins. Annu Rev Med 2014;65:433–445.

7. Violi F, Calvieri C, Ferro D, Pignatelli P. Statins as antithrombotic drugs. Circulation 2013;127:251–257.

8. Palinski W, Tsimikas S. Immunomodulatory effects of statins: mechanisms and potential impact on arteriosclerosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:1673–1681.

9. Mach F. Statins as immunomodulatory agents. Circulation 2004;109(21 Suppl 1):II15–II17.

10. de Jongh S, Lilien MR, op’t Roodt J, Stroes ES, Bakker HD, Kastelein JJ. Early statin therapy restores endothelial function in children with familial hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:2117–2121.

11. Wolfrum S, Jensen KS, Liao JK. Endothelium-dependent effects of statins. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003;23:729– 736.

12. Thompson PD, Clarkson P, Karas RH. Statin-associated myopathy. JAMA 2003;289:1681–1690.

13. Law M, Rudnicka AR. Statin safety: a systematic review. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:52C–60C.

14. Newman CB, Preiss D, Tobert JA, et al. Statin Safety and associated adverse events: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2019;39:e38–e81.

15. Pasternak RC, Smith SC Jr, Bairey-Merz CN, Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Lenfant C. ACC/AHA/NHLBI clinical advisory on the use and safety of statins. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:567–572.

16. Beyer IW, Karmali R, Demeester-Mirkine N, Cogan E, Fuss MJ. Serum creatine kinase levels in overt and subclinical hypothyroidism. Thyroid 1998;8:1029–1031.

17. Bourgeois FT, Shannon MW, Valim C, Mandl KD. Adverse drug events in the outpatient setting: an 11-year national analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2010;19:901–910.

18. Wang Y, Li Q, Yuan Z, et al. Statin use and benefits of thyroid function: a retrospective cohort study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021;12:578909.

19. Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, et al. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63(25 Pt B):2889–2934.

20. Lando HM, Burman KD. Two cases of statin-induced myopathy caused by induced hypothyroidism. Endocr Pract 2008;14:726–731.

21. Tokinaga K, Oeda T, Suzuki Y, Matsushima Y. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) might cause high elevations of creatine phosphokinase (CK) in patients with unnoticed hypothyroidism. Endocr J 2006;53:401–405.

22. Jbara Y, Bricker D. Rhabdomyolysis in the setting of induced hypothyroidism and statin therapy: a case report. Eur Thyroid J 2015;4:62–64.

23. Ahn P, Min HJ, Park SH, et al. Rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney injury associated with hypothyroidism and statin therapy. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2013;28:331–334.

24. Manoukian AA, Bhagavan NV, Hayashi T, Nestor TA, Rios C, Scottolini AG. Rhabdomyolysis secondary to lovastatin therapy. Clin Chem 1990;36:2145–2147.

25. Monzani F, Caraccio N, Siciliano G, Manca L, Murri L, Ferrannini E. Clinical and biochemical features of muscle dysfunction in subclinical hypothyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997;82:3315–3318.

26. Argov Z, Renshaw PF, Boden B, Winokur A, Bank WJ. Effects of thyroid hormones on skeletal muscle bioenergetics. In vivo phosphorus-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of humans and rats. J Clin Invest 1988;81:1695–1701.

27. Brewer HB Jr. Benefit-risk assessment of Rosuvastatin 10 to 40 milligrams. Am J Cardiol 2003;92:23K–29K.

28. Davis JW, Weller SC. Intensity of statin therapy and muscle symptoms: a network meta-analysis of 153 000 patients. BMJ Open 2021;11:e043714.

29. Bae HJ, Cho YK, Park HS, et al. Early efficacy and safety of statin therapy in Korean patients with hypercholesterolemia: Daegu and Gyeongbuk Statin Registry. Korean J Intern Med 2020;35:342–350.

30. Rosenson RS. Current overview of statin-induced myopathy. Am J Med 2004;116:408–416.

31. Kim HS, Kim JH. Proceed with caution when using real world data and real world evidence. J Korean Med Sci 2019;34:e28.

32. Kim HS, Kim DJ, Yoon KH. Medical big data is not yet available: why we need realism rather than exaggeration. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2019;34:349–354.

33. Thompson PD, Panza G, Zaleski A, Taylor B. Statin-associated side effects. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:2395–2410.