Korean J Intern Med > Volume 39(2); 2024 > Article
Lee, Ahn, Hong, Oh, Lee, Yoo, and Kim: Effect of belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus treated with low dose or no corticosteroids

Abstract

Background/Aims

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) responder index (SRI)-4 response has been achieved with belimumab treatment in patients with moderate disease activity in cornerstone clinical trials and following studies. However, most studies involved patients treated with a mean prednisolone-equivalent dose of approximately 10 mg/d and focused on the steroid-sparing effect of belimumab. We aimed to identify the effect of belimumab in patients with mild-to-moderate SLE who were treated with low-dose or no corticosteroids.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of patients treated with belimumab for at least 6 months between May 2021 and June 2022. The primary endpoint was SRI-4 response at 6 months.

Results

Thirty-one patients were included (13 low dose- and 18 steroid non-users). The mean age was 39.2 ± 11.4 years, and 90.3% of patients were female. The baseline Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) score was 6.0 (4.0–9.0). The primary endpoint was achieved in 32.3% (10/31) of patients. Significant improvements in anemia, C4 levels, and SELENA-SLEDAI score were observed during treatment. Univariate analysis showed that the baseline SELENA-SLEDAI and arthritis were significantly associated with SRI-4 response at 6 months, and only the SELENA-SLEDAI remained significant (p = 0.014) in multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

This cohort study is the first to report the efficacy of belimumab after minimizing the effect of corticosteroids. Belimumab showed efficacy in improving the SELENA-SLEDAI score, anemia, and low C4 in patients who did not receive corticosteroids or received only low doses.

Graphical abstract

INTRODUCTION

Belimumab is the first biologic agent approved for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (March 9, 2011) [1]. B cells play an important role in SLE pathogenesis, and B-cell activating factor, also called B-lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS), is one of the mechanisms underlying the increase in B cells. Belimumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to soluble B-cell activating factor and inhibits its activity [2]. The Belimumab in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (BLISS)-52 trial showed significant differences between the placebo and belimumab groups in the reduction of the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) score by ≥ 4 points after 52 weeks (58% in the belimumab [10 mg/kg] group vs. 46% in the placebo group; p = 0.0024) [3]. Real- world studies consistently demonstrated a systemic lupus erythematosus responder index (SRI)-4 in patients with moderate disease activity [4,5]. In these studies, SRI-4 was significantly associated with baseline features including high SELENA-SLEDAI score, corticosteroid dose, smoking status, BlyS level, and combining polyarthritis [4,5]. However, most of the previous studies have been conducted in patients with moderate-to-severe SLE activity treated with a mean prednisolone- equivalent dose of 10–20 mg/d [36]. The effects of belimumab in patients with SLE who are not undergoing corticosteroid treatment have not been well elucidated. Furthermore, studies have shown that high baseline corticosteroid dosage or prednisolone ≥ 7.5 mg/d were independent predictors of an SRI-4 response [4,5]. Therefore, in order to examine the effect of belimumab while minimizing the corticosteroid effect, we reviewed the medical records of SLE patients who either did not receive corticosteroids or received low doses of corticosteroids.

METHODS

Patient and data collection

The present study retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with SLE aged ≥ 18 years and treated with belimumab at a single tertiary center in Seoul, South Korea. As belimumab has been available in South Korea since 2021, patients in the belimumab group first received the drug between May 2021 and June 2022. Patients who experienced adverse effects from corticosteroids or were at risk of developing them were given belimumab instead. If the patient did not meet the national health insurance criteria, belimumab was administered without reimbursement. SLE was diagnosed according to the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Criteria [7] and 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) Classification Criteria [8]. Lupus nephritis (LN) was diagnosed and classified according to the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) 2003 classification system [9]. This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The Institutional Review Board of Asan Medical Center approved this study (IRB No. 2023-0317). Because of the retrospective nature of the study, the requirement of informed consent was waived. Patient information was pseudonymized to reduce the risk of data subject identification according to the Institutional Review Board of Asan Medical Center. After deleting the identification information of research subjects, random research subject numbers were assigned and managed, and personal identification information will not be used even when future research results are published. The following patient data were collected from the electronic medical records: age, sex, time from SLE and LN diagnosis to belimumab administration, type of immunosuppressant (IS), concomitant corticosteroid dose, histological features of kidney biopsy, and laboratory data, including complete blood count (CBC), creatinine level, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urine protein/creatinine ratio, complement level, anti-double- stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) level, and extractable nuclear antigen antibody (ENA). Laboratory data of CBC, creatinine level, eGFR, urine protein/creatinine ratio, complement level, and anti-dsDNA level at 3 and 6 months were also reviewed.

Study variables and outcomes

Belimumab was administered at a dose of 10 mg/kg. Concomitant IS referred to co-administration for at least 1 month. SLE disease activity was measured using the SELENA-SLEDAI score at baseline and at 3 and 6 months after belimumab treatment initiation. Clinical manifestations at baseline indicated whether there were positive items based on the SELENA-SLEDAI. The primary outcome was SRI-4 response at 6 months, and other clinical outcomes including mean SELENA-SLEDAI score, laboratory data including CBC, complement proteins, and anti-ds DNA at 6 months were measured and compared to those at baseline. Leukopenia was defined as white blood cell (WBC) count < 4,000/μL, anemia as hemoglobin < 12.0 mg/dL, and thrombocytopenia as a platelet count < 150 × 103/μL. We also tried to identify the factors associated with the SRI-4 response.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables are described as frequencies and percentages (n, %), and continuous variables are described as means (standard deviations [SDs]) or medians (interquartile ranges [IQRs]). Parametric and non-parametric data between the two groups were compared using the independent t-test and Mann–Whitney U test, respectively. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed to compare data at each time point. The p value of post-hoc analysis was corrected using the Bonferroni test. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with the SRI-4 response. The results are described as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS (version 21.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A p value lower than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics

During the study period, 49 patients were treated with belimumab (Fig. 1). After excluding patients who stopped belimumab treatment before 6 months (n = 2), 31 of the 47 patients who used less than 5 mg of prednisolone or an equivalent dose were included. All patients were followed-up for 6 months after belimumab administration. Of them, 18 were steroid non-users and 13 were steroid users. Steroid non-users were off corticosteroid treatment for a median duration of 476 days (276.8–842.3 d). The baseline characteristics of patients with SLE are shown in Table 1. The mean age was 39.2 ± 11.4 years, and 28 (90.3%) patients were female. The baseline SELENA-SLEDAI score was 6.0 (4.0–9.0). Sixteen patients (51.6%) were diagnosed with LN confirmed on biopsy before administration of belimumab. According to the ISN/RPS classification system, 9 (56.3%) patients were class III or III + V and 7 (43.8%) were IV or IV + V. At the initiation of administration of belimumab, only 8 showed renal manifestation according to SELENA-SLEDAI (hematuria, proteinuria, or pyuria) (Table 1). All patients had low complement levels and high anti-ds DNA levels at baseline. We divided the patients into two groups according to their use of corticosteroids: the steroid non-user group (group 1) and the low-dose steroid user group (group 2), the latter of which used less than 5 mg of prednisolone or an equivalent dose. When analyzed according to the use of corticosteroids, no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups.

Changes in clinical parameters in patients administered belimumab

We divided patients into those with and without cytopenia and evaluated improvement over time (Table 2). Patients with anemia showed a significant increase in hemoglobin levels during belimumab treatment. Patients with leukopenia and thrombocytopenia showed a trend of increasing cell count over time, although this was not significant. Serologically, complement levels increased and anti-dsDNA levels decreased over time, although the only significant finding was the increase in C4 levels. SELENA-SLEDAI decreased significantly after the administration of belimumab (p = 0.016).

Factors associated with SRI-4 response

Among 31 patients, 10 patients (32.3%) achieved an SRI-4 response at 6 months. Factors associated with the SRI-4 response were then identified using logistic regression analysis (Table 3). Baseline serology, laboratory findings, presence of LN, concomitant ISs, and ENA positivity did not show a significant association with the SRI-4 response. Baseline SELENA-SLEDAI and the presence of arthritis were significantly associated with the SRI-4 response in univariate analysis, although only SELENA-SLEDAI remained significant in multivariate analysis.

Adverse effects of patients administered belimumab

The adverse effects of belimumab administration are described in Table 4. Seven patients experienced adverse effects. Of them, one patient recovered after outpatient treatment due to acute gastroenteritis and one patient had an infusion reaction that was resolved with pre-medication of pheniramine before belimumab infusion; all other cases of adverse effects were resolved spontaneously.

DISCUSSION

The steroid-sparing effect of belimumab was previously demonstrated [3] and is consistent with other studies that 70–90% of patients in the trials were on 10–30 mg/d mean dose of prednisolone-equivalent [46, 1013]. In the present study, we evaluated patients who did not use corticosteroids or who were treated with low-doses. Nonetheless, patients with cytopenia showed a trend of improving cell counts, and serologically, a trend of increasing complement and decreasing anti-ds DNA was observed. Additionally, SELENA-SLEDAI decreased significantly over 6 months.
In a previous study on cytopenia, patients with leukopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia all showed significant improvement at the 24-month follow-up after the administration of belimumab [10]. Regarding the serologic effects of belimumab, a significant increase in C3 and C4 and a significant decrease in anti-ds DNA have been reported after 52 weeks of belimumab administration [14]. Our results also support these results showing significant changes in hemoglobin levels and C4 levels and changing trends in WBC counts, platelet counts, and anti-ds DNA levels. Since the effect of belimumab on serologic activity has been demonstrated in larger studies [4,14], we should consider the possibility that significant effects may not have been detected in the present study because of the small number of patients.
The SRI-4 response rate of our study was lower than that in previous studies, which may be a result of the shorter follow-up period of our study. However, it is lower than that in other studies that had similar follow-up durations. An Italian multicenter cohort study of 446 subjects with a mean SLEDAI-2K score of 9.3 ± 3.3 of whom 39.4% had a SLEDAI-2K ≥ 10 reported an SRI-4 response rate of 49.2% at 6 months [15]. We hypothesized that the underlying disease activity in the patients in this study was mild-to-moderate and that most patients scored four points because they had a positive SELENA-SLEDAI serology item; therefore, improvement in 6 months may be difficult to achieve. A previous study showed that in 35.7% of patients, the median time to anti-ds DNA seroconversion was 6.6 months, and in 38.7% of patients, C3 and C4 normalized in a median time of 7 months [5].
There has been extensive research on the predictors of SRI-4 response [4,5,15]. Known predictors included initial SLEDAI-2K ≥ 10, polyarthritis, PD ≥ 7.5 mg/d, high baseline prednisone equivalent dosages, and high baseline BlyS level [4,5,15]. Current smoking status was reported as a negative predictor of the SRI-4 response rate [5]. Consistent with previous findings, arthritis and baseline SELENA-SLEDAI also showed predictive value in our univariate analysis, and SELENA-SLEDAI remained significant in multivariate analysis.
The present study has several limitations. First, the study was conducted in a single center and involved only Asian patients. Second, belimumab was only recently introduced in South Korea. Therefore, patient groups were small, and long-time follow-up results could not be presented. Longterm follow-up studies with more patients are needed.
In summary, belimumab was shown to be effective in improving SELENA-SLEDAI, anemia, and low C4 in patients treated with no or low doses of corticosteroids. Therefore, belimumab may be beneficial for patients with mild-to-moderate SLE activity, including those who were not undergoing corticosteroid treatment.

KEY MESSAGE

1. Among SLE patients who did not receive corticosteroids or received low doses, 32.3% achieved SRI-4 response within 6 months of belimumab treatment.
2. SLE patients with low-dose or no corticosteroids showed improvement in anemia, complement levels, and SELENA-SLEDAI after treatment with belimumab.
3. Baseline SELENA-SLEDAI was significantly associated with SRI-4 response in patients with minimal use of corticosteroids.

Notes

CRedit authorship contributions
Yeo-Jin Lee: data curation, formal analysis, writing - original draft, writing - review & editing; Soo-Min Ahn: methodology, writing - review & editing; Seokchan Hong: supervision; Ji-Seon Oh: conceptualization; Chang-Keun Lee: writing - review & editing; Bin Yoo: supervision; Yong-Gil Kim: conceptualization, writing - review & editing, funding acquisition
Conflicts of interest
The authors disclose no conflicts.
Funding
This work was supported by Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center (2022IF0013).

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, YG Kim. The data are not publicly available due to ethical review board restrictions as it contains information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.

Figure 1
Patient selection flowchart.
kjim-2023-229f1.jpg
kjim-2023-229f2.jpg
Table 1
Baseline characteristics of patients with SLE treated with belimumab and low dose or no corticosteroids
Variable All (n = 31) No corticosteroid (n = 18) Low dose corticosteroid (n = 13) p value
Age, yr 39.2 ± 11.4 39.1 ± 9.7 39.2 ± 13.9 0.978
Sex, female 28 (90.3) 16 (88.9) 12 (92.3) 0.755
Duration since SLE diagnosis, mo 169.8 ± 96.8 188.1 ± 98.5 144.6 ± 92.2 0.223
Duration since LN diagnosis, mo 119.4 ± 70.4 118.0 ± 75.3 123.8 ± 62.9 0.893
SELENA-SLEDAI 6.0 (4.0–9.0) 5.5 (4.0–10.5) 6.0 (4.0–8.5) 0.919
LN 16 (51.6) 12 (66.7) 4 (30.8) 0.052
Corticosteroid dose, mg/d 5.0 (2.5–5.0)
Clinical manifestations
 Renal 8 (25.8) 4 (22.2) 4 (30.8) 0.598
 Skin 7 (22.6) 2 (11.1) 5 (38.5) 0.077
 Arthritis 6 (19.4) 2 (11.1) 4 (30.8) 0.179
 Hematologic 12 (38.7) 9 (50.0) 3 (23.1) 0.135
Laboratory findings
 WBC, /μL 4,077.4 ± 1,618.8 3,944.4 ± 1,878.7 4,261.5 ± 1,219.7 0.599
 Hb, mg/dL 11.45 ± 1.57 11.18 ± 1.66 11.81 ± 1.42 0.283
 Platelet, × 103/μL 187.7 ± 73.44 180.4 ± 81.61 197.8 ± 62.09 0.525
 ESR, mm/h 32.9 ± 27.5 33.6 ± 28.0 32.0 ± 27.9 0.882
 CRP, mg/dL 0.10 (0.10–0.18) 0.14 (0.10–0.20) 0.10 (0.10–0.10) 0.049
 Creatinine, mg/dL 0.79 ± 0.22 0.84 ± 0.25 0.73 ± 0.16 0.146
 eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 80.7 ± 13.7 77.9 ± 15.4 84.5 ± 10.3 0.190
 UPCR, mg/g 162.7 (112.8–280.6) 171.8 (109.1–406.3) 146.8 (111.4–176.7) 0.311
ENA positivity
 Anti-RNP, U/mL 20 (64.5) 14 (77.8) 6 (46.2) 0.074
 Anti-Sm, U/mL 16 (51.6) 10 (55.6) 6 (46.2) 0.611
 Anti-Ro, U/mL 22 (71.0) 15 (83.3) 7 (53.8) 0.079
 Anti-La, U/mL 12 (38.7) 8 (44.4) 4 (30.8) 0.448
 Anti-Scl70, U/mL 1 (3.2) 0 (0.0) 1 (7.7) 0.253
 C3, mg/dL 64.6 (46.9–72.7) 61.6 (45.0–69.8) 68.3 (51.5–74.4) 0.357
 C4, mg/dL 10.25 ± 5.14 9.51 ± 5.76 11.27 ± 4.16 0.357
 Anti-dsDNA, IU/mL 86.6 (32.8–158.0) 86.9 (34.4–228.0) 80.6 (30.3–132.5) 0.484
Concomitant IS (0–6 mo)
 Hydroxychloroquine 31 (100.0) 18 (100.0) 13 (100.0) > 0.999
 Mycophenolate mofetil 17 (54.8) 11 (61.1) 6 (46.2) 0.417
 Tacrolimus 8 (25.8) 6 (33.3) 2 (15.4) 0.268
 Methotrexate 5 (16.1) 3 (16.7) 2 (15.4) 0.925
 Azathioprine 4 (12.9) 0 (0.0) 4 (30.8) 0.013
Previous treatment
 Hydroxychloroquine 31 (100.0) 18 (100.0) 13 (100.0) > 0.999
 Azathioprine 22 (71.0) 13 (72.2) 9 (69.2) 0.859
 Mycophenolate mofetil 21 (67.7) 14 (77.8) 7 (53.8) 0.166
 Methotrexate 16 (51.6) 8 (44.4) 8 (61.5) 0.355
 Tacrolimus 12 (38.7) 9 (50.0) 3 (23.1) 0.135
 Cyclophosphamide 11 (35.5) 9 (50.0) 2 (15.4) 0.051
 Rituximab 6 (19.4) 5 (27.8) 1 (7.7) 0.169

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation, number (%), or median (interquartile range).

anti-dsDNA, anti-double-stranded DNA; Corticosteroid dose, prednisolone equivalent dose; CRP, C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ENA, extractable nuclear antigen antibody; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; Hb, hemoglobin; IS, immunosuppressant; LN, lupus nephritis; SELENA-SLEDAI, Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; UPCR, urine protein/creatinine ratio; WBC, white blood cell.

Table 2
Changes in clinical parameters in patients with SLE treated with belimumab and no or low dose of corticosteroids (n = 31)
Variable Baseline Duration of 0–3 months Duration of 0–6 months p value Post-hoc test
p valuea) p valueb) p valuec)
CBC
WBC, /μL
 Leukopenia (+) 2,713.3 ± 597.5 246.7 ± 639.0 333.3 ± 882.1 0.143 0.246 > 0.999 0.430
 Leukopenia (−) 5,356.3 ± 1,141.3 −387.5 ± 831.8 −368.8 ± 955.5 0.165 0.471 > 0.999 0.496
Hb, mg/dL
 Anemia (+) 10.56 ± 1.13 0.17 ± 0.87 0.40 ± 0.73 0.025 1.000 0.424 0.074
 Anemia (−) 13.06 ± 0.72 −0.37 ± 0.87 −0.22 ± 1.15 0.543 0.557 > 0.999 > 0.999
Platelet, × 103/μL
 Thrombocytopenia (+) 106.0 ± 30.4 24.0 ± 29.8 21.5 ± 49.4 0.153 0.240 1.000 0.459
 Thrombocytopenia (−) 232.6 ± 45.2 9.6 ± 46.1 8.9 ± 34.0 0.301 > 0.999 0.899 0.902
Serology
 C3, mg/dL 59.13 ± 15.46 1.16 ± 9.95 6.24 ± 21.51 0.117 > 0.999 0.505 0.351
 C4, mg/dL 10.25 ± 5.14 2.15 ± 2.56 3.21 ± 4.57 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.278 0.001
Anti-dsDNA, IU/mL 138.41 ± 159.56 −45.76 ± 104.46 −36.70 ± 174.88 0.252 0.063 > 0.999 0.755
Renal profile
 Creatinine, mg/dL 0.79 ± 0.22 0.04 ± 0.12 0.02 ± 0.09 0.168 0.243 > 0.999 0.503
 eGFR, mL/min/1.73m2 80.71 ± 13.67 −1.90 ± 6.10 −2.13 ± 6.44 0.076 0.277 > 0.999 0.227
 UPCR, mg/g 418.10 ± 777.02 −108.02 ± 350.99 −100.15 ± 413.98 0.306 0.423 > 0.999 0.917
SELENA-SLEDAI 7.58 ± 4.23 −2.00 ± 3.25 −1.87 ± 4.08 0.016 0.005 > 0.999 0.048

anti-dsDNA, anti-double-stranded DNA; CBC, complete blood count; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; Hb, hemoglobin; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SELENA-SLEDAI, Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index; UPCR, urine protein/creatinine ratio; WBC, white blood cell.

a) Analysis of baseline and 3-month values (analysis of variance).

b) Analysis of 3- and 6-month values.

c) Analysis of baseline and 6-month values.

Table 3
Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with SRI-4 response (n = 31)
Variable Unadjusted OR (95% CI) p value Adjusted OR (95% CI) p value
Age 1.043 (0.973–1.117) 0.237
Duration from SLE diagnosis to treatment 1.002 (0.994–1.010) 0.649
Duration from LN diagnosis to treatment 0.982 (0.956–1.009) 0.200
Baseline SELENA-SLEDAI 2.109 (1.230–3.618) 0.007 1.972 (1.145–3.394) 0.014
Baseline C3 1.018 (0.967–1.073) 0.493
Baseline C4 1.023 (0.882–1.186) 0.767
Baseline anti-dsDNA 1.002 (0.998–1.007) 0.355
Baseline UPCR 1.001 (1.000–1.002) 0.177
Baseline creatinine 0.058 (0.001–4.760) 0.206
Baseline eGFR 1.033 (0.964–1.107) 0.363
Baseline CRP 14.912 (0.029–7,564.754) 0.395
Baseline ESR 0.998 (0.970–1.027) 0.882
LN 0.264 (0.053–1.325) 0.106
Clinical manifestation
 Renal 2.833 (0.534–15.042) 0.221
 Skin 1.821 (0.321–10.342) 0.499
 Arthritis 20.000 (1.888–211.842) 0.013 4.282 (0.254–72.082) 0.313
 Hematologic 3.750 (0.772–18.209) 0.101
Concomitant IS (0–6 mo)
 MMF 0.214 (0.042–1.092) 0.064
 Azathioprine 2.375 (0.283–19.924) 0.425
 Tacrolimus 0.222 (0.023–2.122) 0.191
 Methotrexate 4.071 (0.558–29.725) 0.166
ENA positivity
 Anti-RNP, U/mL 0.400 (0.084–1.903) 0.250
 Anti-Sm, U/mL 0.500 (0.108–2.314) 0.375
 Anti-Ro, U/mL 5.538 (0.586–52.331) 0.135
 Anti-La, U/mL 3.750 (0.772–18.209) 0.101

anti-dsDNA, anti-double-stranded DNA; CI, confidence interval; CRP, C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ENA, extractable nuclear antigen antibody; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; IS, immunosuppressant; LN, lupus nephritis; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; OR, odds ratio; SELENA-SLEDAI, Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index; SLE, systemic lupus erythematosus; SRI-4, systemic lupus erythematosus responder index; UPCR, urine protein/creatinine ratio.

Table 4
Adverse effects in patients treated with belimumab (n = 31)
Age, yr Sex Adverse effect Management
1 59 F Skin rash Resolved by pre-medication
2 34 F Lightheadedness Resolved without treatment
3 48 F Abdominal pain Resolved without treatment
4 38 F Dizziness Resolved without treatment
5 44 F Skin reaction Resolved without treatment
6 27 F Skin reaction Resolved without treatment
7 34 M Acute gastroenteritis (outpatient) Resolved by medication

F, female; M, male.

REFERENCES

1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA approval of BENLYSTA (belimumab) [Internet] Silver Spring (MD): FDA, 2011. [cited 2023 Mar 22]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2011/125370Orig1s000ltr.pdf .

2. Hahn BH. Belimumab for systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1528–1535.
crossref pmid
3. Navarra SV, Guzmán RM, Gallacher AE, et al.; BLISS-52 Study Group. Efficacy and safety of belimumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2011;377:721–731.
crossref pmid
4. Iaccarino L, Andreoli L, Bocci EB, et al. Clinical predictors of response and discontinuation of belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in real life setting. Results of a large, multicentric, nationwide study. J Autoimmun 2018;86:1–8.
crossref pmid
5. Parodis I, Sjöwall C, Jönsen A, et al. Smoking and pre-existing organ damage reduce the efficacy of belimumab in systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmun Rev 2017;16:343–351.
crossref pmid
6. Huang SP, Snedecor SJ, Nanji S, Lloyd E, Bell CF. Real-world effectiveness of belimumab in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic literature review. Rheumatol Ther 2022;9:975–991.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
7. Petri M, Orbai AM, Alarcón GS, et al. Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:2677–2686.
pmid pmc
8. Aringer M, Costenbader K, Daikh D, et al. 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71:1400–1412.
pmid pmc
9. Weening JJ, D’Agati VD, Schwartz MM, et al. The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004;15:241–250.
crossref pmid
10. Collins CE, Dall’Era M, Kan H, et al. Response to belimumab among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in clinical practice settings: 24-month results from the OBSErve study in the USA. Lupus Sci Med 2016;3:e000118.
crossref pmid pmc
11. Hui-Yuen JS, Reddy A, Taylor J, et al. Safety and efficacy of belimumab to treat systemic lupus erythematosus in academic clinical practices. J Rheumatol 2015;42:2288–2295.
crossref pmid pmc
12. Schwarting A, Schroeder JO, Alexander T, et al. First real-world insights into belimumab use and outcomes in routine clinical care of systemic lupus erythematosus in Germany: results from the OBSErve Germany study. Rheumatol Ther 2016;3:271–290.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
13. Touma Z, Sayani A, Pineau CA, et al. Belimumab use, clinical outcomes and glucocorticoid reduction in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus receiving belimumab in clinical practice settings: results from the OBSErve Canada Study. Rheumatol Int 2017;37:865–873.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
14. Furie R, Petri M, Zamani O, et al.; BLISS-76 Study Group. A phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study of belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B lymphocyte stimulator, in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:3918–3930.
crossref pmid pmc
15. Gatto M, Saccon F, Zen M, et al. Early disease and low baseline damage as predictors of response to belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in a real-life setting. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020;72:1314–1324.
pmid

Editorial Office
101-2501, Lotte Castle President, 109 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2271-6792    Fax: +82-2-790-0993    E-mail: kaim@kams.or.kr                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Internal Medicine.

Close layer
prev next