Molecular targeted therapy for advanced gastric cancer

Jong Gwang Kim

doi:10.3904/kjim.2013.28.2.149

Korean J Intern Med > Volume 28(2); 2013 > Article

Kim: Molecular targeted therapy for advanced gastric cancer

Review

The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2013;28(2):149-155.

Published online: February 27, 2013

PubMed ID: 23525404

Article Id (pmc): 3604602

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2013.28.2.149

Molecular targeted therapy for advanced gastric cancer

Jong Gwang Kim

Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.

Correspondence to Jong Gwang Kim, M.D. Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, 680 Gukchaebosang-ro, Jung-gu, Daegu 700-842, Korea. Tel: +82-53-200-3521, Fax: +82-53-200-2029, jkk21c@knu.ac.kr

Received January 03, 2013 Accepted February 06, 2013

(open-access, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Although medical treatment has been shown to improve quality of life and prolong survival, no significant progress has been made in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) within the last two decades. Thus, the optimum standard first-line chemotherapy regimen for AGC remains debatable, and most responses to chemotherapy are partial and of short duration; the median survival is approximately 7 to 11 months, and survival at 2 years is exceptionally > 10%. Recently, remarkable progress in tumor biology has led to the development of new agents that target critical aspects of oncogenic pathways. For AGC, many molecular targeting agents have been evaluated in international randomized studies, and trastuzumab, an anti-HER-2 monoclonal antibody, has shown antitumor activity against HER-2-positive AGC. However, this benefit is limited to only ~20% of patients with AGC (patients with HER-2-positive AGC). Therefore, there remains a critical need for both the development of more effective agents and the identification of molecular predictive and prognostic markers to select those patients who will benefit most from specific chemotherapeutic regimens and targeted therapies.

Keywords: Stomach neoplasms; Drug therapy; Targeted agents

INTRODUCTION

The survival of patients with gastric cancer is substantially worse than that of patients with most other solid malignancies, and the only treatment that offers a potential cure is complete resection of the tumor. However, because the disease is asymptomatic in its early stages, more than half of gastric carcinomas are diagnosed in the advanced stage, when resection is no longer possible. Thus, although medical treatment has been shown to improve quality of life and prolong survival, there has been no significant progress in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) within the last two decades [1,2]. Although the optimum standard f irst-line chemotherapy regimen for AGC remains debatable, a double regimen comprising fluorouracil (or its oral prodrugs) plus platinum or a triple regimen with the addition of epirubicin or docetaxel is most commonly used [3,4]. However, most responses to chemotherapy are partial and of short duration. As a result, the current median survival is approximately 7 to 11 months, and survival at 2 years is exceptionally > 10% [3-5].

During the past few decades, remarkable progress in tumor biology has led to the development of new agents that target critical aspects of oncogenic pathways. In various tumor types, including hematologic malignancies, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, renal cancer, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors, many molecular targeting agents have already exhibited significant antitumor activity.

An emerging understanding of the molecular pathways that characterize cell growth, the cell cycle, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and invasion has provided novel targets in cancer therapy. These therapeutic strategies include epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, antiangiogenic agents, cell cycle inhibitors, and apoptosis promoters. In various tumor types, including hematologic malignancies, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, renal cancer, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors, many molecular targeting agents have already exhibited significant antitumor activity. For AGC, many targeted agents have also been evaluated in international randomized studies, and trastuzumab, an anti-HER-2 monoclonal antibody (mAb), has been shown to improve survival in patients with HER-2-positive AGC. Accordingly, this review covers the recent advances in biologic agents for the treatment of AGC on the basis of the best available evidence.

EGFR INHIBITORS

EGFR exists on the cell surface and is activated by the binding of specific ligands, including EGF and transforming growth factor alpha. EGFR possesses an intracellular tyrosine kinase domain that, upon activation, may initiate downstream signaling, ultimately resulting in DNA synthesis and cell proliferation. The EGFR family comprises four members: HER-1 (also known as EGFR-1), HER-2, HER-3, and HER-4. Among these, EGFR-1 and HER-2 represent the targets for drugs currently under development for gastric cancer.

Anti-EGFR mAbs (cetuximab/panitumumab)

EGFR is commonly overexpressed in gastrointestinal malignancies. Its overexpression is associated with a more aggressive phenotype and poorer survival, which suggests that EGFR may be a rational therapeutic target [6]. Following reports of the poor efficacy of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) gefitinib and erlotinib in gastric cancers [7,8], mAbs, primarily cetuximab, have been tested in several published trials [9,10]. In a phase II trial (n = 38) using cetuximab in combination with 5-FU, leucovorin, and irinotecan in chemo-naive patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers, an objective response rate of 44% was observed in a population of 89% stomach and 11% GEJ cancers, and the median time to tumor progression was 8 months [10]. Similar to the results in patients with colorectal cancer, EGFR expression levels did not correlate with treatment efficacy. Meanwhile, in a biomarker analysis included in the trial by Han et al. [9], they confirmed that K-Ras mutations or an increased EGFR gene copy number are uncommon events in gastric cancer. They also demonstrated that patients with EGFR expression and low levels of the major ligands EGF and tumor growth factor-α had a 100% response rate, a finding that deserves urgent confirmation in prospective trials. However, despite a favorable comparison between the reported response rates in these phase II trials for combination chemotherapy with cetuximab and current data for chemotherapy alone [3], the median survival is similar to previously published phase II clinical trials. The results of a randomized phase III trial comparing cetuximab in combination with capecitabine and cisplatin with chemotherapy alone (EXPAND) were reported recently. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 4.4 and 9.4 months, respectively, in patients assigned to cetuximab plus chemotherapy compared with 5.6 and 10.7 months, respectively, in those assigned to chemotherapy alone (PFS, p = 0.3158; OS, p = 0.9547) [11]. Panitumumab is a fully humanized IgG2 mAb targeting EGFR. A randomized phase III trial (REAL-3) compared panitumumab plus combination chemotherapy (epirubicin/oxaliplatin/capecitabine, EOX regimen) with combination chemotherapy alone in 553 patients with untreated advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, GEJ, or stomach. However, the survival in the panitumumab arm was inferior to that in the chemotherapy-alone arm (PFS, 6.0 months vs. 7.4 months, p = 0.068; OS, 8.8 months vs. 11.3 months, p = 0.013) [12]. Accordingly, there is no plan to move forward with anti-EGFR mAbs in further clinical investigation of AGC.

EGFR TKI (erlotinib/gefitinib)

Erlotinib showed no tumor response in patients with gastric cancer, while patients with GEJ cancer had a response rate of 9%. The OS of stomach and GEJ cancer was 3.5 and 6.7 months, and PFS was 1.6 and 3 months, respectively [7]. In a trial involving 70 patients with previously treated AGC, although gefitinib reached tumor concentrations sufficient to inhibit EGFR activation, this did not translate into a clinical benefit [13]. Moreover, gefitinib combined with 5-FU + cisplatin and radiotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment did not increase pathologic complete response rates, while the 3-year OS was increased compared with historical controls in patients with locally advanced esophageal and GEJ cancer (42% vs. 28%) [14]. The lack of erlotinib and gefitinib activity in gastric cancer in these trials may be related to the variable etiologies among different tumor locations. For example, GEJ adenocarcinoma is associated with Barrett's esophagus, while gastric cancer is associated with Helicobacter pylori infection. The different molecular pathways targeted by EGFR inhibitors could be differentially expressed in proximal versus distal adenocarcinomas.

Anti-HER-2 mAbs (trastuzumab)

Trastuzumab is a humanized anti-HER-2 mAb that is already widely accepted as a standard agent for HER-2-positive breast cancer. In the case of gastric cancer, this agent has also been evaluated in a global randomized trial comparing 5-FU or capecitabine/cisplatin with 5-FU or capecitabine/cisplatin plus trastuzumab based on the examination of HER-2 overexpression in gastric cancer tissues [15]. Among 3,807 patients centrally tested for their HER-2 status, 22.1% were HER-2-positive. Notably, HER-2-positive rates were found to be significantly higher in GEJ cancer than in gastric cancer (33.2% vs. 20.9%, p < 0.001) and higher in intestinal than in diffuse/mixed cancer (32.2% vs. 6.1%/20.4%, p < 0.001). The median OS was improved significantly in the trastuzumab arm compared with the chemotherapy-alone arm (13.5 months vs. 11.1 months, p = 0.0048; hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.91). In subgroup analysis, the patients with HER-2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2⁺ / fluorescence in situ hybridization + or IHC 3⁺ had a longer OS compared with the chemotherapy-alone arm (16 months vs. 11.8 months). Moreover, the safety profiles were similar with no unexpected adverse events in the trastuzumab arm. Therefore, it was concluded that trastuzumab is a new, effective, and well-tolerated treatment for HER-2-positive AGC.

HER-2 TKI (lapatinib)

Lapatinib is a dual inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase domains of HER-1 and HER-2 based on its interference with adenosine triphosphate binding. Lapatinib has also been clinically shown to be active against HER-2-positive breast cancer as a monotherapy and in combination with capecitabine. However, a single-agent phase II study demonstrated very modest activity with a response rate of only 5% in unselected patients with metastatic gastric cancer [16]. In a phase II trial of capecitabine and lapatinib combination as first line treatment in patients with gastric (76%) or GEJ cancer (24%), 24% and 36% of patients achieved a partial response and stable disease, respectively [17]. A phase II international study (LOGiG) comparing capecitabine/oxaliplatin with/without lapatinib as first line treatment for AGC has reached its accrual goal and is ongoing for follow-up. In addition, a randomized trial (TYTAN) comparing lapatinib and paclitaxel with paclitaxel alone in patients with HER-2-positive metastatic gastric cancer in a second-line setting is ongoing.

ANGIOGENESIS INHIBITORS

Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis are strongly linked with angiogenesis in most solid tumors. Recognition of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway as a key regulator of angiogenesis has led to the development of several VEGF-targeting agents, including neutralizing antibodies to VEGF or its receptor (VEGFR) and TKIs targeting the VEGFR.

Anti-VEGF mAbs (bevacizumab)

Bevacizumab is a VEGF-A-blocking mAb currently under investigation for the treatment of gastric cancer. Several phase II trials combining bevacizumab with different chemotherapeutic compounds were conducted on treatment-naïve or pretreated patients with AGC or GEJ cancer, demonstrating results that were initially promising [18-20]. For example, a pivotal phase II trial (n = 47) using bevacizumab in combination with irinotecan and cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with gastric (51%) or GEJ (49%) adenocarcinomas reported a response rate of 65%, median time to tumor progression of 8.3 months, and median survival of 12.3 months. Although the chemotherapy-related toxicity occurred as expected, the favorable efficacy results were counterbalanced by the following bevacizumab-related toxicities: two patients with a gastric perforation, one patient with a near-perforation (overall incidence of perforation, 6%), 25% incidence of grade III or IV thromboembolic events, and 4% incidence of grade III hemorrhages [18]. In a second single-arm phase II trial (n = 42) using a modified docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil regimen in combination with bevacizumab in patients with metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma, similar results for efficacy were observed. Moreover, the incidence of grade III/IV venous thromboembolism was 29%, and 93% of these were asymptomatic and identified only on protocol-specific scans. One patient developed a gastrointestinal perforation [19]. Accordingly, gastrointestinal perforation and thromboembolic events may represent a serious drawback in the use of bevacizumab in gastric cancer, meaning that careful risk analysis is needed in randomized trials. Based on these efficacy results, a randomized trial (AVAGAST) comparing capecitabine/cisplatin alone with capecitabine/cisplatin plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy in 774 patients with gastric or GEJ cancer was conducted [21]. Although significant improvement in PFS and overall response rates was noted in the bevacizumab group, the median OS was 12.1 months for the bevacizumab group and 10.1 months for the placebo group (HR, 0.87; p = 0.1002), failing to meet the primary end-point. In subgroup analysis, OS for the pan-American subgroup was 6.8 months in the placebo arm versus 11.5 months in the bevacizumab arm (HR, 0.63). For the European and Asian-Pacific subgroups, OS was 8.6 months versus 11.1 months (HR, 0.85) and 12.1 months versus 13.9 months (HR, 0.97), respectively, with all results favoring bevacizumab. The incidence of grades III to V adverse events potentially related to bevacizumab was similar in both arms (20% in the bevacizumab arm vs. 15% in the placebo arm). Another randomized trial to compare epirubicin/cisplatin/capecitabine (ECX) with ECX plus bevacizumab in a perioperative setting in the UK is also ongoing.

Anti-VEGFR mAbs (ramucirumab)

Ramucirumab is a fully humanized mAb targeting VEGFR. Several trials are ongoing, including a randomized phase II clinical trial of mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin/5-FU/folic acid) chemotherapy plus ramucirumab versus mFOLFOX6 plus placebo for advanced GEJ cancer and a randomized phase III study of paclitaxel with or without ramucirumab in patients with metastatic gastric cancer after failure of f irst-line therapy with platinum and fluoropyrimidine.

VEGFR TKI (sunitinib/sorafenib/cediranib/apatinib)

Sunitinib

Multi-TKI sunitinib has exhibited activity against VEGFRs as well as Raf, platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta, fibroblast growth factor receptors, and c-KIT. At present, sunitinib at 50 mg/day as a single agent has been studied as a second- or third-line treatment for AGC in two nonrandomized phase II studies [22,23]. An Asian study (n = 72) showed a partial response rate of 2.6% and a > 6-week stable disease rate of 32.1%, while the median PFS was 2.3 months and median OS was 6.8 months [22]. In another phase II trial, sunitinib monotherapy was conducted on 52 patients with chemorefractory AGC, resulting in a median OS of 5.8 months and displaying less effectiveness than anticipated [23]. Although sunitinib was well tolerated in these pretreated patients, these studies showed little clinical value in a monotherapy setting. Thus, a randomized trial of second-line chemotherapy plus sunitinib versus chemotherapy alone is necessary to establish the therapeutic benefit of sunitinib in this pretreated patient population.

Sorafenib

Sorafenib is a potent inhibitor of the Raf tyrosine kinase as well as several other receptor tyrosine kinases involved in the progression of gastric cancers, such as VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 [24]. Based on data derived from hepatocellular carcinoma trials, several studies were designed to investigate the role of sorafenib in AGC. In a first phase II study (n = 44) for patients with metastatic (80%) or locally advanced (20%) gastric and GEJ cancer using oral sorafenib (400 mg twice daily) in combination with docetaxel and cisplatin in a 21-day cycle, the median OS was 13.6 months, with a PFS of 5.8 months and a response rate of 41% [25]. The authors suggested that sorafenib combined with docetaxel and cisplatin was effective and tolerable as a treatment for gastric or GEJ cancer. Other phase II or III studies using sorafenib combined with capecitabine or S-1 plus cisplatin are currently being conducted in Korea and Japan.

Cediranib

Cediranib is a highly potent inhibitor of VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 that displays activity against c-Kit and platelet-drived growth factor receptor-β [26]. A phase I trial of cediranib with a fluoropyrimidine (S-1 or capecitabine) and cisplatin was conducted as a first-line treatment for 14 Japanese patients with AGC [27]. The most common adverse events were decreased appetite, fatigue, and nausea, and a preliminary efficacy evaluation showed one confirmed and three unconfirmed partial responses. Investigations are expected to continue in the future.

Apatinib

Apatinib (YN968D1) is a small-molecule TKI that inhibits VEGFR-2 (Flk-1/KDR), RET, c-Kit, and c-Src tyrosine kinases [28]. The efficacy of apatinib was evaluated as a third-line treatment for 141 patients with AGC in a three-arm phase II study (placebo vs. apatinib at 850 mg once a day vs. 425 mg twice a day) [29]. The respective survival rates were as follows: (median PFS, 1.4 months vs. 3.4 months vs. 3.4 months; median OS, 2.5 months vs. 4.8 months vs. 4.3 months). Common adverse effects included hypertension and hand-foot syndrome. A phase III trial comparing apatinib to placebo in a third-line setting in AGC is currently being conducted in China.

Other targeted agents

Everolimus

Everolimus (RAD001) is an oral inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin, which is downstream of the Akt pathway. The results of a phase II study of everolimus in 53 patients with previously treated AGC showed a disease control rate of 56.0% and median PFS of 2.7 months. At a median follow-up duration of 9.6 months, the median OS was 10.1 months and good tolerability was observed [30]. After obtaining a remarkable response in patients with metastatic gastric cancer in previous phase I/II studies in Japan [30,31], a prospective randomized placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy of everolimus as a second- or third-line therapy in 656 patients with AGC was conducted [32]. Although the PFS was significantly improved by everolimus (1.7 months vs. placebo, 1.4 months; p < 0.0001), the OS, a primary endpoint of the study, was not significantly different (everolimus, 5.4 months vs. placebo, 4.3 months; p = 0.1244).

Onartuzumab

A c-Met is an oncogene encoding a membrane tyrosine kinase receptor; hepatocyte growth factor receptor (HGFR) that plays an important role in tumor development through activation of key oncogenic pathways, angiogenesis, and tumor metastasis. A high level of c-Met expression has been correlated with the metastatic spread of tumors and poor survival in patients with various types of tumors, including gastric cancer [33], suggesting that it may be a suitable therapeutic target for gastric cancer. Therefore, several agents targeting c-Met, including onartuzumab (humanized mAb directed against HGFR) and a TKI of activated c-Met, are now in the developmental stages. A phase II clinical trial of onartuzumab in combination with mFOLFOX6 in patients with metastatic HER-2-negative gastroesophageal cancer is scheduled to begin in the near future.

Vorinostat

Vorinostat, also known as suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, is an histone deacetylase inhibitor. Preclinical studies have shown that vorinostat has potential antigastric cancer activity, with a synergistic effect when combined with taxane [34]. A phase I/II study of vorinostat plus capecitabine and cisplatin as a first-line treatment is being conducted for patients with AGC.

Catumaxomab

The development of ascites is a major clinical problem in patients with AGC, and the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), which has been shown to be highly overexpressed in gastric as well as several other epithelial cancers, is the target of the trifunctional bispecific antibody catumaxomab. The intraperitoneal administration of catumaxomab in patients with malignant ascites due to EpCAM-positive epithelial cancers resulted in a significantly increased puncture-free survival in a randomized study [35], and the side effects were mostly symptoms related to cytokine release (pyrexia, nausea, and vomiting) and abdominal pain, which were generally mild to moderate and fully reversible.

CONCLUSIONS

Emerging data from the clinical development of molecular-targeted agents have provided novel opportunities that are expected to translate into survival benefits in the treatment of AGC. The final results of the ToGA study recently demonstrated that the addition of trastuzumab to combination chemotherapy can achieve remarkable survival advantages in patients with HER-2-positive AGC. However, this benefit is limited to only ~20% of patients with AGC (patients with HER-2-positive AGC). Therefore, there remains a critical need for both the development of more effective agents and the identification of predictive and prognostic molecular markers to select those patients who will benefit most from specific chemotherapeutic regimens and targeted therapies.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article is reported.

References

1. Murad AM, Santiago FF, Petroianu A, Rocha PR, Rodrigues MA, Rausch M. Modified therapy with 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and methotrexate in advanced gastric cancer. Cancer 1993;72:37–41PMID : 8508427.

2. Pyrhonen S, Kuitunen T, Nyandoto P, Kouri M. Randomised comparison of fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin and methotrexate (FEMTX) plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 1995;71:587–591PMID : 7533517.

3. Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S, et al. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med 2008;358:36–46PMID : 18172173.

4. Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S, et al. Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4991–4997PMID : 17075117.

5. Wagner AD, Grothe W, Haerting J, Kleber G, Grothey A, Fleig WE. Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2903–2909PMID : 16782930.

6. Kitagawa Y, Ueda M, Ando N, Ozawa S, Shimizu N, Kitajima M. Further evidence for prognostic significance of epidermal growth factor receptor gene amplification in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 1996;2:909–914PMID : 9816249.

7. Dragovich T, McCoy S, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, et al. Phase II trial of erlotinib in gastroesophageal junction and gastric adenocarcinomas: SWOG 0127. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4922–4927PMID : 17050876.

8. Ferry DR, Anderson M, Beddard K, et al. A phase II study of gefitinib monotherapy in advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma: evidence of gene expression, cellular, and clinical response. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:5869–5875PMID : 17908981.

9. Han SW, Oh DY, Im SA, et al. Phase II study and biomarker analysis of cetuximab combined with modified FOLFOX6 in advanced gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 2009;100:298–304PMID : 19127259.

10. Pinto C, Di Fabio F, Siena S, et al. Phase II study of cetuximab in combination with FOLFIRI in patients with untreated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FOLCETUX study). Ann Oncol 2007;18:510–517PMID : 17164226.

11. Lordick F, Bodoky G, Chung H, et al. Cetuximab in combination with capecitabine and cisplatin as first-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer: randomized controlled phase III EXPAND study [abstract]. Ann Oncol 2012;23:LBA3.

12. Waddell TS, Chau I, Barbachano Y, et al. A randomized multicenter trial of epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (EOC) plus panitumumab in advanced esophagogastric cancer (REAL3) [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:LBA4000.

13. Rojo F, Tabernero J, Albanell J, et al. Pharmacodynamic studies of gefitinib in tumor biopsy specimens from patients with advanced gastric carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:4309–4316PMID : 16963731.

14. Rodriguez CP, Adelstein DJ, Rice TW, et al. A phase II study of perioperative concurrent chemotherapy, gefitinib, and hyperfractionated radiation followed by maintenance gefitinib in locoregionally advanced esophagus and gastroesophageal junction cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2010;5:229–235PMID : 20009775.

15. Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010;376:687–697PMID : 20728210.

16. Iqbal S, Goldman B, Lenz HJ, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Blanke CD. A phase II study of GW572016 (lapatinib) as first line therapy in patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 2007;25(18 Suppl):4621.

17. Lenz H, Zhang W, Kemner AM. Lapatinib 1 capecitabine in advanced gastric cancer: an open-label phase II study of non ERBB2-targeted disease [abstract]. Ann Oncol 2010;21(Suppl 8):S817.

18. Shah MA, Ramanathan RK, Ilson DH, et al. Multicenter phase II study of irinotecan, cisplatin, and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:5201–5206PMID : 17114652.

19. Shah MA, Jhawer M, Ilson DH, et al. Phase II study of modified docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil with bevacizumab in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:868–874PMID : 21189380.

20. El-Rayes BF, Zalupski M, Bekai-Saab T, et al. A phase II study of bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel in locally advanced and metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers. Ann Oncol 2010;21:1999–2004PMID : 20332133.

21. Ohtsu A, Shah MA, Van Cutsem E, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:3968–3976PMID : 21844504.

22. Bang YJ, Kang YK, Kang WK, et al. Phase II study of sunitinib as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer. Invest New Drugs 2011;29:1449–1458PMID : 20461441.

23. Moehler M, Mueller A, Hartmann JT, et al. An open-label, multicentre biomarker-oriented AIO phase II trial of sunitinib for patients with chemo-refractory advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 2011;47:1511–1520PMID : 21561763.

24. Wilhelm SM, Adnane L, Newell P, Villanueva A, Llovet JM, Lynch M. Preclinical overview of sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor that targets both Raf and VEGF and PDGF receptor tyrosine kinase signaling. Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7:3129–3140PMID : 18852116.

25. Sun W, Powell M, O'Dwyer PJ, Catalano P, Ansari RH, Benson AB 3rd. Phase II study of sorafenib in combination with docetaxel and cisplatin in the treatment of metastatic or advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: ECOG 5203. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:2947–2951PMID : 20458043.

26. Lindsay CR, MacPherson IR, Cassidy J. Current status of cediranib: the rapid development of a novel anti-angiogenic therapy. Future Oncol 2009;5:421–432PMID : 19450171.

27. Satoh T, Yamada Y, Muro K, et al. Phase I study of cediranib in combination with cisplatin plus fluoropyrimidine (S-1 or capecitabine) in Japanese patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2012;69:439–446PMID : 21853311.

28. Tian S, Quan H, Xie C, et al. YN968D1 is a novel and selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 tyrosine kinase with potent activity in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Sci 2011;102:1374–1380PMID : 21443688.

29. Li J, Qin S, Xu J, et al. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, phase, three-arm, placebo-control study of apatinib as third-line treatment in patients with metastatic gastric carcinoma [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 2011;29(Suppl):4019.

30. Doi T, Muro K, Boku N, et al. Multicenter phase II study of everolimus in patients with previously treated metastatic gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:1904–1910PMID : 20231677.

31. Lim T, Lee J, Lee DJ, et al. Phase I trial of capecitabine plus everolimus (RAD001) in patients with previously treated metastatic gastric cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2011;68:255–262PMID : 21526353.

32. Van Cutsem E, Yeh KH, Bang YJ, et al. Phase III trial of everolimus (EVE) in previously treated patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC): GRANITE-1. J Clin Oncol 2012;30(Suppl 4):LBA3.

33. Nakajima M, Sawada H, Yamada Y, et al. The prognostic significance of amplification and overexpression of c-met and c-erb B-2 in human gastric carcinomas. Cancer 1999;85:1894–1902PMID : 10223227.

34. Chang H, Rha SY, Jeung HC, et al. Identification of genes related to a synergistic effect of taxane and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid combination treatment in gastric cancer cells. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2010;136:1901–1913PMID : 20217129.

35. Parsons SL, Murawa PX, Kolesnik OO, et al. Treatment of epithelial cancer patients with malignant ascites using catumaxomab: results of the non-ovarian stratum of a phase II/III study [abstract]. J Clin Oncol 2008;26(Suppl):106. PMID : 18165644.