Korean J Intern Med > Volume 38(2); 2023 > Article
Park: Comment on “ Positive fecal immunochemical test results are associated with non-colorectal cancer mortality”
The paper by Jung et al. [1], titled “Positive fecal immunochemical test results are associated with non-colorectal cancer mortality,” reported on the association between colorectal cancer (CRC)/non-CRC mortality and fecal immunochemical test (FIT), which is used for CRC screening in a large number of patients. Various biomarkers are used for the diagnosis and prognosis prediction of CRC [2]. Among them, guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) and FIT are used as screening tools in many countries. The gFOBT is useful as a non-invasive screening test; however, it cannot differentiate between human and non-human heme and does not provide information on the location of bleeding [2]. FIT detects human globin through a human hemoglobin-specific immunoassay and has higher sensitivity and specificity than FOBT [2]; however, it has a limitation that a positive test result does not eliminate the need for diagnostic colonoscopy to evaluate colorectal lesions.
Several studies have reported a relationship between FOBT results and mortality [3,4]. Libby et al. [3] reported that a positive gFOBT result is associated with a higher risk of CRC and non-CRC mortality. With respect to the high correlation of a positive FOBT with not only CRC mortality but also non-CRC mortality, factors including the use of aspirin or anticoagulants in the elderly with circulatory diseases, as well as systemic inflammation have been discussed [1,3,5]. However, the effectiveness of FIT as a screening tool for CRC also needs to be considered. Although FIT may raise awareness about non-CRC mortality, FIT alone is insufficient for CRC screening, and appropriate correlation with colonoscopy is required.
Colonoscopy is gaining popularity as a population-based CRC screening tool because it allows the evaluation of the entire intestine at once, can remove precancerous or early CRC lesions, and has a longer examination interval than other CRC screening tests [6,7]. However, information on the appropriate timing and link-age to colonoscopy after a positive FOBT remains insufficient.
In several Western countries such as Austria, Germany, and Poland, colonoscopy is a population-based screening practice for CRC [8,9]. In the United Kingdom, the long-term effect of a single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening was reported in a study with a follow-up period of 17 years [10]. Approximately 30% of patients in the control and sigmoidoscopy groups underwent gFOBT at least once, and patients in the intervention group tested positive at least once. However, the effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy on the incidence and mortality of CRC was not significantly different between patients with and without gFOBT screening [10]. In addition, screening for non-CRC conditions based on a positive FIT may lead to unnecessary tests.
In Korea, as the health awareness of the population increases, the number of colonoscopy procedures performed during regular medical evaluations is increasing. Therefore, it may be helpful to focus on the appropriate timing and effectiveness of FIT and colonoscopy in CRC screening rather than on its role in predicting non-CRC mortality. A large-scale study on the relevance of colonoscopy and FIT in the screening and mortality prediction of CRC seems necessary.

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

REFERENCES

1. Jung YS, Lee J, Moon CM. Positive fecal immunochemical test results are associated with non-colorectal cancer mortality. Korean J Intern Med 2022;37:313–321.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
2. Oh HH, Joo YE. Novel biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of colorectal cancer. Intest Res 2020;18:168–183.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
3. Libby G, Fraser CG, Carey FA, Brewster DH, Steele RJC. Occult blood in faeces is associated with all-cause and non-colorectal cancer mortality. Gut 2018;67:2116–2123.
crossref pmid pmc
4. Chen LS, Yen AM, Fraser CG, et al. Impact of faecal haemoglobin concentration on colorectal cancer mortality and all-cause death. BMJ Open 2013;3:e003740.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Kim SH, Lim YJ. The role of microbiome in colorectal carcinogenesis and its clinical potential as a target for cancer treatment. Intest Res 2022;20:31–42.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
6. Wong MC, Ching JY, Chan VC, Sung JJ. The comparative cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening using faecal immunochemical test vs. colonoscopy. Sci Rep 2015;5:13568.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
7. Choi YS, Kim WS, Hwang SW, et al. Clinical outcomes of submucosal colorectal cancer diagnosed after endoscopic resection: a focus on the need for surgery. Intest Res 2020;18:96–106.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
8. Quintero E, Castells A, Bujanda L, et al. Colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical testing in colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2012;366:697–706.
pmid
9. Yoon JY, Cha JM, Jeen YT, Medical Policy Committee of Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID); Quality Improvement Committee of Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (KSGE). Quality is the key for emerging issues of population-based colonoscopy screening. Intest Res 2018;16:48–54.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
10. Atkin W, Wooldrage K, Parkin DM, et al. Long term effects of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening after 17 years of follow-up: the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2017;389:1299–1311.
crossref pmid pmc

Editorial Office
101-2501, Lotte Castle President, 109 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2271-6792    Fax: +82-2-790-0993    E-mail: kaim@kams.or.kr                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Internal Medicine.

Close layer
prev next