1. Ubel PA, Angott AM, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Physicians recommend different treatments for patients than they would choose for themselves. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:630–634.
3. National Health Service (NHS); National Cancer Action Team. The characteristics of an effective multidisciplinary team (MDT) [Internet]. London (UK): National Cancer Intelligence Network, 2010. [cited 2019 Nov 8]. Available from:
www.ncin.org.uk/view?rid=136.
5. European Partnership Action Against Cancer consensus group, Borras JM, Albreht T, et al. Policy statement on multidisciplinary cancer care. Eur J Cancer 2014;50:475–480.
6. Korman H, Lanni T Jr, Shah C, et al. Impact of a prostate multidisciplinary clinic program on patient treatment decisions and on adherence to NCCN guidelines: the William Beaumont Hospital experience. Am J Clin Oncol 2013;36:121–125.
7. Liao CT, Kang CJ, Lee LY, et al. Association between multidisciplinary team care approach and survival rates in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2016;38 Suppl 1:E1544–E1553.
8. Pillay B, Wootten AC, Crowe H, et al. The impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: a systematic review of the literature. Cancer Treat Rev 2016;42:56–72.
9. Kelly SL, Jackson JE, Hickey BE, Szallasi FG, Bond CA. Multidisciplinary clinic care improves adherence to best practice in head and neck cancer. Am J Otolaryngol 2013;34:57–60.
10. Jung SM, Hong YS, Kim TW, et al. Impact of a multidisciplinary team approach for managing advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer. World J Surg 2018;42:2227–2233.
18. Griffith C, Turner J. United Kingdom national health service, cancer services collaborative “improvement partnership”, redesign of cancer services: a national approach. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004;30 Suppl 1:1–86.
22. Greer HO, Frederick PJ, Falls NM, et al. Impact of a weekly multidisciplinary tumor board conference on the management of women with gynecologic malignancies. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2010;20:1321–1325.
24. Kurpad R, Kim W, Rathmell WK, et al. A multidisciplinary approach to the management of urologic malignancies: does it influence diagnostic and treatment decisions? Urol Oncol 2011;29:378–382.
27. Santoso JT, Schwertner B, Coleman RL, Hannigan EV. Tumor board in gynecologic oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2004;14:206–209.
28. Cohen P, Tan AL, Penman A. The multidisciplinary tumor conference in gynecologic oncology: does it alter management? Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009;19:1470–1472.
29. Chinai N, Bintcliffe F, Armstrong EM, Teape J, Jones BM, Hosie KB. Does every patient need to be discussed at a multidisciplinary team meeting? Clin Radiol 2013;68:780–784.
30. Acher PL, Young AJ, Etherington-Foy R, McCahy PJ, Deane AM. Improving outcomes in urological cancers: the impact of “multidisciplinary team meetings”. Int J Surg 2005;3:121–123.
33. Newman EA, Guest AB, Helvie MA, et al. Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at a breast cancer multidisciplinary tumor board. Cancer 2006;107:2346–2351.
37. Saviani-Zeoti F, Petean EB. Breaking bad news: doctors’ feelings and behaviors. Span J Psychol 2007;10:380–387.
39. Hojat M, Louis DZ, Maxwell K, Markham FW, Wender RC, Gonnella JS. A brief instrument to measure patients’ overall satisfaction with primary care physicians. Fam Med 2011;43:412–417.