Background/Aims

This study evaluated the clinical utility of serum periostin measured at diagnosis in reflecting activity at diagnosis and predicting all-cause mortality during follow-up in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV).

Methods

This study included 76 patients with AAV whose serum periostin was measured from sera collected and stored at diagnosis. The correlation of either serum periostin or the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) with other variables was evaluated. Cumulative survival rates were compared using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. The variables at diagnosis were compared between deceased and surviving patients. Hazard ratios were obtained by Cox proportional hazard analysis.

Results

The median age of the 76 patients was 64.0 years and 60.5% were female. The median BVAS and serum periostin were 5.0 and 10.9 ng/mL, respectively. Five of the 76 patients (6.6%) died. Serum periostin was independently correlated with cross-sectional BVAS, the Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI), white blood cell count, and serum albumin. Patients with serum periostin ≥ 15.9 ng/mL at diagnosis had a significantly lower cumulative survival rate than those without. In addition to high VDI, dyslipidaemia frequency, and C-reactive protein, deceased patients showed higher serum periostin than surviving patients. In multivariable Cox analysis, however, only dyslipidaemia rather than serum periostin was identified as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality.

Conclusions

This study is the first to demonstrate that serum periostin at diagnosis could independently reflect cross-sectional BVAS and further partially contribute to all-cause mortality prediction in patients with AAV.

Key words: Periostin; Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; Vasculitis; Activity; Mortality

Graphical abstract

INTRODUCTION

Periostin is an extracellular matrix protein that belongs to the Fasciclin family because of its homology to Fasciclin 1. Periostin is produced in mesenchymal lineage cells such as osteoblasts, periodontal ligament, and periosteum, and it is secreted into the extracellular space [1]. Periostin plays a role in forming and maintaining cellular structures by interacting with structural matrix proteins, including collagen [2]. Conversely, as a matricellular protein, it may also play other roles in regulating and modulating cellular functions through cross-talk with cell-surface receptors, proteases, and hormones [3,4]. The clinical utility of serum periostin was first reported in allergic diseases because of the induction of periostin gene expression by interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-13 [2,5]. Subsequently, many studies have reported the utility of periostin as a serum biomarker and therapeutic target in various chronic inflammatory and fibrotic diseases, such as liver and lung diseases [6]. In particular, periostin is involved in signalling pathways via nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells, IL-8, extracellular signal-regulated kinase, and mitogen-activated protein kinase in the pathophysiology of chronic kidney diseases and inflammatory bowel disease [7,8]. The possibility of the clinical utility of periostin in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) with a similar pathological mechanism has been proposed [9,10]. To date, only one study that included patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) has reported the clinical utility of serum periostin in AAV [11]. However, since the pathogenesis of EGPA is also partially based on a well-known allergic immunological mechanism, the previous study could not represent all cases of AAV with vasculitic immunological mechanisms and thus; may not provide new and additional information on pre-existing concepts [12]. To determine the clinical role of serum periostin in AAV, patients with three subtypes of AAV: microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), and EGPA were included in this study and the clinical utility of serum periostin in patients with AAV was evaluated.

METHODS

Patients

Patients

One hundred patients with AAV were randomly selected from the Severance Hospital ANCA-associated VasculitidEs (SHAVE) cohort, a prospective and observational cohort of Korean patients with AAV, and retrospectively screened by reviewing their medical records. Among the 100 patients, 76 were included in this study based on the inclusion criteria: (1) fulfilment of the following three criteria for or definitions of AAV: the 2007 European Medicines Agency algorithms for AAV, the 2012 revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides, and the 2022 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) classification criteria for AAV [13–18]; (2) first classification of AAV at the Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, and Severance Hospital, from November 2015 to June 2023; (3) completion of sufficiently well-written medical records to collect clinical, laboratory, radiological, and histopathological data for AAV classification at diagnosis and to obtain data for further assessment of the progression to all-cause mortality during follow-up [15–17,19]; (4) a minimum follow- up of six months; (5) completion of written informed consent at diagnosis; (6) availability of sera stored at diagnosis; (7) no concomitant serious medical conditions such as malignancies and severe infectious diseases at the time of AAV diagnosis [18]; (8) no exposure to immunosuppressive drugs within four weeks before AAV diagnosis.

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Severance Hospital, Republic of Korea (IRB No. 4-2016-0901). All patients in this study provided written informed consent at the time of being included in the SHAVE cohort (at the time of both AAV diagnosis and blood sampling). The IRB waived the need for additional written informed consent when it had been previously obtained at entry into the SHAVE cohort.

Clinical information, blood samples, and measurement of serum periostin

Clinical information, blood samples, and measurement of serum periostin

Clinical data as described in Table 1 were collected. Explaining several important items, first, perinuclear (P)-ANCA and cytoplasmic (C)-ANCA were accepted as ANCA results in addition to myeloperoxidase (MPO)-ANCA and proteinase 3 (PR3)-ANCA according to the 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria for AAV [15–17]. Second, AAV-specific indices included the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS), the Five-Factor Score (FFS), the 36-item short form survey physical and mental component summary (SF-36 PCS and SF-36 MCS), and the Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) [20–23]. Third, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidaemia were recorded as comorbidities and as a part of the traditional risk factors for mortality [24]. Fourth, we investigated all-cause mortality as a poor outcome in AAV cases [25]. Although almost all patients died of two causes such as disease progression and infection, because it was impossible to clearly distinguish one from the other, we used the term, “all-cause mortality” in this study. We defined the follow-up duration based on all-cause mortality as the period from AAV diagnosis to death for deceased patients and as that from AAV diagnosis to the last visit for surviving patients. Finally, the number of patients who had ever received each medication during follow-up was counted.

Whole blood was obtained from patients with AAV on the day of the completion of written informed consent (the same day of AAV diagnosis). Sera were immediately isolated from whole blood and stored at −80°C. The concentration of serum periostin was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) from collected and stored sera at diagnosis.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous and categorical variables were expressed as medians (25–75 percentiles), and numbers (percentages). Correlation coefficients (r) between the two variables were obtained using either Pearson correlation analysis or univariable linear regression analysis. The standardised correlation coefficient (β) was obtained by multivariable linear regression analysis using variables with statistical significance in univariable analysis. Significant differences between the two categorical variables were analysed using chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. Significant differences between two continuous variables were compared using Mann–Whitney U test. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model using variables with p < 0.1 in a univariable Cox analysis was performed to obtain a hazard ratio (HR) during follow-up. The significant area under the curve (AUC) was confirmed by performing a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The optimal cut-off was extrapolated by performing ROC curve analysis and selected as one with the maximum sum of sensitivity and specificity the relative risk (RR) of the cut-off for all-cause mortality was analysed using contingency tables and chi-square test. A comparison of the cumulative survival rates between the two groups was performed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis with the log-rank test. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Characteristics

Characteristics

The median age of the 76 patients (36 with MPA, 24 with GPA, and 16 with EGPA) was 64.0 years and, 46 patients (60.5%) were female. MPO-ANCA (or P-ANCA) and PR3-ANCA (or C-ANCA) were detected in 41 (53.9%), and 12 patients (15.8%), respectively. The median BVAS, FFS, SF-36 PCS, SF-36 MCS, and VDI were 5.0, 0.0, 52.5, 54.6, and 3.0, respectively. In addition, the median erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were 18.0 mm/h, and 3.6 mg/L, respectively. The median serum periostin was 10.9 ng/mL. Regarding variables during follow- up, five of the 76 patients (6.6%) died during a median follow-up of 26.7 months. Almost all patients (98.7%) received glucocorticoids; the most commonly administered immunosuppressive drug was cyclophosphamide (64.5%), followed by azathioprine (59.2%) (Table 1).

Correlation analysis among variables at diagnosis

Correlation analysis among variables at diagnosis

Age and body mass index at diagnosis were significantly correlated with cross-sectional serum periostin. Moreover, BVAS (r = 0.450), FFS (r = 0.337), SF-36 PCS (r = −0.255), VDI (r = 0.354), ESR (r = 0.361), and CRP (r = 0.425) at diagnosis were significantly correlated with cross-sectional serum periostin. Among the laboratory results at diagnosis, serum periostin was positively correlated with cross-sectional blood urea nitrogen (r = 0.264), and serum creatinine (r = 0.284), and inversely correlated with haemoglobin (r = −0.454), and serum albumin (r = −0.447) (Table 2).

Linear regression analyses for BVAS among variables at diagnosis

Linear regression analyses for BVAS among variables at diagnosis

In univariable linear regression analysis, FFS, SF-36 PCS, SF-36 MCS, VDI, ESR, white blood cell count, haemoglobin, platelet count, total serum protein, serum albumin, and serum periostin at diagnosis were significantly correlated with cross-sectional BVAS. In multivariable analysis without AAV-specific indices, white blood cell count (standardised β 0.362, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.495–1.645), serum albumin (standardised β −2.392, 95% CI −9.800 to −0.867), and serum periostin (standardised β 0.205, 95% CI 0.008–0.737) at diagnosis were independently correlated with cross-sectional BVAS. In addition, in multivariable analysis including AAV-specific indices with statistical significance in univariable analysis, VDI (standardised β 0.213, 95% CI 0.139–1.976), white blood cell count (standardised β 0.324, 95% CI 0.397–1.511), serum albumin (standardised β −0.343, 95% CI −9.640 to −0.567), and serum periostin (standardised β 0.246, 95% CI 0.083–0.812) at diagnosis were independently correlated with cross-sectional BVAS (Table 3).

Comparison of variables at diagnosis according to all-cause mortality

Comparison of variables at diagnosis according to all-cause mortality

Deceased patients tended to be older than surviving patients (74.0 years vs. 63.0 years, p = 0.087). Among the variables regarding AAV-specific indices at diagnosis, VDI in deceased patients was significantly higher than that in surviving patients (5.0 vs. 3.0, p = 0.013). BVAS and FFS also exhibited similar patterns but no statistical significance was found. Among comorbidities at diagnosis, deceased patients had dyslipidaemia more frequently than surviving patients (80.0% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.003). Type 2 diabetes mellitus also showed a similar pattern but it did not reach significance. Among inflammatory indices, CRP showed a significant difference between deceased and surviving patients (65.7 mg/L vs. 2.7 mg/L, p = 0.024). ESR also presented a similar tendency despite no statistical significance. Finally, deceased patients were demonstrated to have significantly higher serum periostin than surviving patients (16.4 ng/mL vs. 10.8 ng/mL, p = 0.033). Therefore, we concluded that from a strictly statistical point of view, serum periostin, along with VDI, dyslipidaemia, and CRP, exhibited a significantly elevated value in deceased patients compared to surviving patients at the time of AAV diagnosis (Table 4).

Cox proportional hazard analyses for all-cause mortality

Cox proportional hazard analyses for all-cause mortality

First of all, we divided variables at diagnosis into three categories according to the risk factors adjusted to the disease condition of AAV such as conventional, AAV-specific, and inflammatory-related risks [24,25]. In univariable Cox analysis, among conventional risks, body mass index, and dyslipidaemia were significantly associated with all-cause mortality. Among AAV-specific risks, BVAS, and VDI were significantly associated with all-cause mortality. Among inflammation-related risks, only CRP was significantly associated with all-cause mortality. Finally, serum periostin also exhibited a significant association with all-cause mortality. In multivariable Cox analysis including only variables with significance in univariable analysis, only the presence of baseline dyslipidaemia was identified to be significantly and independently associated with all-cause mortality during follow-up in patients with AAV (Table 5).

Cut-off and RR for all-cause mortality and cumulative survival rates

Cut-off and RR for all-cause mortality and cumulative survival rates

Using ROC curve analysis, the optimal cut-off of serum periostin at diagnosis for all-cause mortality during follow-up was set as 15.9 ng/mL (AUC 0.787, 95% CI 0.525–1.000, p = 0.033). The sensitivity and specificity of this cut-off were 80.0%, and 90.1%, respectively (Fig. 1A). When patients were divided into two groups according to serum periostin at diagnosis of 15.9 ng/mL, all-cause mortality during follow- up was identified more commonly in patients with serum periostin ≥ 15.9 ng/mL at diagnosis in than those with a lower value (36.4% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.001). Additionally, they also had a significantly higher risk for all-cause mortality during follow-up than those with serum periostin < 15.9 ng/mL at diagnosis (RR 36.571, 95% CI 3.572–374.407) (Fig. 1B). Patients with serum periostin ≥ 15.9 ng/mL at diagnosis had a significantly lower cumulative patients’ survival rate than those with serum periostin < 15.9 ng/mL at diagnosis (p < 0.001) (Fig. 1C).

DISCUSSION

This study investigated the clinical utility of serum periostin in AAV and there were several notable findings. First, serum periostin at diagnosis was significantly correlated with cross-sectional AAV activity and acute-phase reactants. Additionally, serum periostin at diagnosis exhibited the potential as a predictor of all-cause mortality during follow-up in patients with AAV. In particular, clinical implication of this study is that this is the first to elucidate the clinical roles of serum periostin at diagnosis during the disease course of AAV.

We speculated that the mechanistic background enables serum periostin to play a crucial clinical role in patients with AAV. IL-4 and IL-13 have been reported to enhance gene expression and production of periostin, revealing the immunological mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of asthma [2,5]. In addition, a previous study reported the clinical role of serum periostin in patients with EGPA, including an allergic component [11]. Therefore, based on these prior studies, we divided the patients into two groups; patients with MPA and GPA, and patients with EGPA, and predictions were made by comparing the variables between the two groups. First, the count of eosinophils at diagnosis may be higher in patients with EGPA than in those with MPA and GPA. As expected, patients with EGPA exhibited a higher median eosinophil count than those with MPA and GPA (280.0/mm³ vs. 90.0/mm³, p = 0.003). Second, serum periostin may be higher in patients with EGPA than in those with MPA and GPA. This is because periostin production is influenced by the eosinophil-specific cytokines, IL-4, and IL-13. However, in contrast to our expectations, patients with EGPA had a significantly lower median serum periostin than those with MPA and GPA (9.3 ng/mL vs. 11.7 ng/mL, p < 0.001). Moreover, when serum periostin was adjusted for BVAS, patients with EGPA had a significantly reduced median serum periostin/BVAS ratio compared to those with MPA and GPA (1.1 vs. 2.0, p = 0.040). Therefore, based on these results, it can be reasonably concluded that serum periostin in AAV, including EGPA, may be affected by signalling pathways other than those involving IL-4 or IL-13 [2,5,7,8].

Ideally, this issue should be clarified by investigating the intracellular signalling pathways involved in the crosslink between serum periostin and cross-sectional BVAS. However, because the cells that produce and secrete periostin or the tissues with these cells were no obtained from the patients included in this study, this proved impractical. Nevertheless, several inferences are made based on the results of multivariable linear regression analysis of the variables at diagnosis (Table 3). In multivariable linear regression analysis, the ability of serum periostin to independently reflect the current activity of AAV was proved to be comparable to that of VDI. Therefore, the first inference is that serum periostin may reflect cross-sectional BVAS by participating in intracellular signals related to the pathogenesis of AAV, that could induce damage in various major organs [23,26,27]. In addition, multivariable analysis revealed that the potential of serum periostin to independently estimate cross-sectional BVAS was not inferior to white blood cell count and serum albumin. Therefore, the second inference is that serum periostin may indirectly estimate cross-sectional BVAS by facilitating intracellular signals related to general inflammatory reactions [28]. These findings highlight that serum periostin is linked to intracellular signalling pathways directly and indirectly related to AAV, which we believe may represent a great advantage as a biomarker.

In the present study, we found that serum periostin at diagnosis was significantly and independently correlated with cross-sectional BVAS in patients with AAV. We further investigated which of the nine systemic items of BVAS contributed to the observed correlation with serum periostin [20]. Among the items of BVAS, serum periostin was significantly correlated with general (r = 0.280, p = 0.014), pulmonary (r = 0.237, p = 0.039), renal (r = 0.530, p < 0.001), and neurological (r = 0.245, p = 0.033) manifestations (Supplementary Table 1). Additionally, we identified more detailed correlations between serum periostin and the subitems of each systemic item of BVAS as follows: among the subitems of general manifestations, serum periostin was significantly correlated with arthralgia/arthritis (r = 0.278, p = 0.015) and high fever (r = 0.276, p = 0.016). Among the subitems of pulmonary manifestations, serum periostin was significantly correlated with diffuse alveolar haemorrhage (r = 0.328, p = 0.004). Among the subitems of renal manifestations, serum periostin was significantly correlated with proteinuria > 1+ (r = 0.501, p < 0.001), haematuria (r = 0.503, p < 0.001), and serum creatinine ranging from 1.14 to 2.82 mg/dL (r = 0.315, p = 0.006). However, among the subitems of neurological systemic manifestations, no correlation was observed between serum periostin and the subitems. Although limited information prevented further analysis, given that previous studies have reported an association between periostin and central neurological events, lung and kidney diseases, and arthritis [7,8], we believe that this result may be inferred to have some validity and may support the clinical utility of serum periostin in patients with AAV.

The present study also investigated whether serum periostin at diagnosis has a predictive potential for all-cause mortality during follow-up in patients with AAV. We have provided a method to obtain the cut-off of serum periostin for all-cause mortality and demonstrated that patients with serum periostin exceeding the cut-off had a significantly increased risk of death and a decreased cumulative survival rate compared to those without (Fig. 1). However, we failed to demonstrate the independent ability of serum periostin at diagnosis for predicting all-cause mortality in patients with AAV in multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis (Table 5). Nonetheless, since we found the clinical potential of serum periostin for mortality, we inferred how periostin could predict all-cause mortality through the results that serum periostin, along with the frequency of dyslipidaemia and the levels of VDI and CRP, was significantly higher in deceased patients than in surviving patients described in Table 4. First, in terms of dyslipidaemia as a conventional risk for mortality, in this study, patients having dyslipidaemia had a significantly higher serum periostin than those without (14.0 ng/mL vs. 10.7 ng/mL, p = 0.044). Therefore, it is inferred that serum periostin at diagnosis might have the predictive ability for all-cause mortality by interacting with the presence of dyslipidaemia [24]. Second, in terms of VDI as an AAV-specific risk for mortality, serum periostin exhibited a highly close correlation with cross-sectional VDI (Table 2). In the present study, VDI at diagnosis was defined as the first VDI assessing the items lasting for at least 3 months after the first clinical manifestation related to AAV. A recently published study demonstrated the independent predictive potential of the earliest VDI for all-cause mortality in patients with AAV [29]. Therefore, it is also inferred that serum periostin at diagnosis might have the predictive ability for death by borrowing the earliest VDI’s ability to predict all-cause mortality during follow-up in patients with AAV. Third, in terms of CRP as an inflammation-related risk for mortality, serum periostin was also significantly correlated with cross-sectional CRP levels (Table 2). Therefore, it is inferred that serum periostin at diagnosis might have the predictive ability for all-cause mortality during follow-up by being affected by the inflammatory burden at diagnosis [30].

The advantage of the present study is that this is the first to investigate the clinical perspectives involving serum periostin in patients with AAV and to demonstrate further that serum periostin at diagnosis could not only reflect cross-sectional AAV activity but also help to foresee all-cause mortality during follow-up. Therefore, as a pilot study, this study is believed to provide valuable information surrounding the clinical significance of serum periostin as a biomarker for AAV activity and prognosis.

The present study had certain limitations. First, although all study subjects were selected from the prospective and observational cohort of AAV patients, their clinical data were analysed retrospectively, and thus, posed difficulties in further analysis of several variables not included in this study. Owing to the characteristics of a pilot study, the number of enrolled patients was insufficient to generalise the results of this study and apply them to real-world clinical practice immediately. The most critical issue regarding this study might be the absence of mechanistic research and analysis of the intracellular signalling pathways linking serum periostin and both AAV activity at diagnosis and AAV-associated mortality during follow-up. Cross-sectional measurement of serum periostin at diagnosis might also be another limitation. We believe that a prospective future study that includes more patients and serially measures serum periostin will provide more reliable and dynamic information concerning the clinical perspective of serum periostin in patients with AAV not only at diagnosis but also during monitoring and follow-up periods.

In conclusion, this study is the first to demonstrate that serum periostin measured at diagnosis could independently reflect cross-sectional vasculitis activity at diagnosis and further contribute to the prediction of all-cause mortality during follow-up in patients with AAV. Additionally, this study also suggested that mechanisms underpinning the clinical roles of serum periostin might be linked to both intracellular signalling pathways directly and indirectly related to AAV, which may represent a great advantage as a biomarker.

KEY MESSAGE

1. Serum periostin at diagnosis was significantly correlated with cross-sectional AAV activity and acute-phase reactants.

2. Serum periostin at diagnosis was independently correlated with cross-sectional BVAS.

3. Serum periostin at diagnosis exhibited the potential as a predictor of all-cause mortality during follow- up in patients with AAV.

Supplementary Information

kjim-2024-254-Supplementary-Table-1.pdf

Notes

CRedit authorship contributions

Taejun Yoon: conceptualization, methodology, resources, investigation, data curation, formal analysis, software, writing - original draft, writing - review & editing, visualization, project administration; Jiyeol Yoon: conceptualization, methodology, resources, investigation, data curation, formal analysis, software, writing - original draft, writing - review & editing, visualization, project administration; Eunhee Ko: methodology, investigation, data curation, formal analysis, software, writing - review & editing, visualization; Yong-Beom Park: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, validation, writing - review & editing; Sang-Won Lee: conceptualization, methodology, resources, investigation, data curation, formal analysis, software, writing - original draft, writing - review & editing, visualization, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition

Conflicts of Interest

Conflict of interest

The authors disclose no conflicts.

Notes

Funding

This study received funding from CELLTRION PHARM, Inc. Chungcheongbuk- do, Republic of Korea (NCR 2019-6), and Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical Corp, Seoul, Republic of Korea. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication. All authors declare no other competing interests.

References

REFERENCES

1. Bonnet N, Garnero P, Ferrari S. Periostin action in bone. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2016;432:75–82.
[Article] [PubMed]

2. Izuhara K, Ohta S, Ono J. Using periostin as a biomarker in the treatment of asthma. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 2016;8:491–498.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

3. Wong GS, Rustgi AK. Matricellular proteins: priming the tumour microenvironment for cancer development and metastasis. Br J Cancer 2013;108:755–761.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

4. González-González L, Alonso J. Periostin: a matricellular protein with multiple functions in cancer development and progression. Front Oncol 2018;8:225.
[PubMed] [PMC]

5. Matsumoto H. Role of serum periostin in the management of asthma and its comorbidities. Respir Investig 2020;58:144–154.
[Article] [PubMed]

6. Izuhara K, Nunomura S, Nanri Y, et al. Periostin in inflammation and allergy. Cell Mol Life Sci 2017;74:4293–4303.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

7. Yang L, Guo T, Chen Y, Bian K. The multiple roles of periostin in non-neoplastic disease. Cells 2022;12:50.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

8. Sonnenberg-Riethmacher E, Miehe M, Riethmacher D. Periostin in allergy and inflammation. Front Immunol 2021;12:722170.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

9. Berti A, Warner R, Johnson K, RAVE-ITN Research Group, et al. Brief report: circulating cytokine profiles and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody specificity in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2018;70:1114–1121.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

10. Kitching AR, Anders HJ, Basu N, et al. ANCA-associated vasculitis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2020;6:71.
[Article] [PubMed]

11. Rhee RL, Holweg CTJ, Wong K, Vasculitis Clinical Research Consortium, et al. Serum periostin as a biomarker in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. PLoS One 2018;13:e0205768.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

12. Choi CB, Park YB, Lee SW. Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis: experiences in Korean patients. Yonsei Med J 2019;60:705–712.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

13. Watts R, Lane S, Hanslik T, et al. Development and validation of a consensus methodology for the classification of the ANCA- associated vasculitides and polyarteritis nodosa for epidemiological studies. Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:222–227.
[Article] [PubMed]

14. Jennette JC, Falk RJ, Bacon PA, et al. 2012 Revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum 2013;65:1–11.
[PubMed]

15. Suppiah R, Robson JC, Grayson PC, DCVAS INVESTIGATORS, et al. 2022 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria for microscopic polyangiitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2022;81:321–326.
[PubMed]

16. Robson JC, Grayson PC, Ponte C, DCVAS Investigators, et al. 2022 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria for granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2022;81:315–320.
[PubMed]

17. Grayson PC, Ponte C, Suppiah R, DCVAS Study Group, et al. 2022 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology classification criteria for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Ann Rheum Dis 2022;81:309–314.
[Article] [PubMed]

18. Pyo JY, Lee LE, Park YB, Lee SW. Comparison of the 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis with previous criteria. Yonsei Med J 2023;64:11–17.
[Article] [PubMed]

19. Wallace ZS, Fu X, Harkness T, Stone JH, Zhang Y, Choi H. All-cause and cause-specific mortality in ANCA-associated vasculitis: overall and according to ANCA type. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020;59:2308–2315.
[Article] [PubMed]

20. Mukhtyar C, Lee R, Brown D, et al. Modification and validation of the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (version 3). Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68:1827–1832.
[Article] [PubMed]

21. Guillevin L, Pagnoux C, Seror R, Mahr A, Mouthon L, Toumelin PL, French Vasculitis Study Group (FVSG). The Five-Factor Score revisited: assessment of prognoses of systemic necrotizing vasculitides based on the French Vasculitis Study Group (FVSG) cohort. Medicine (Baltimore) 2011;90:19–27.
[PubMed]

22. Han CW, Lee EJ, Iwaya T, Kataoka H, Kohzuki M. Development of the Korean version of Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey: health related QOL of healthy elderly people and elderly patients in Korea. Tohoku J Exp Med 2004;203:189–194.
[Article] [PubMed]

23. Bhamra K, Luqmani R. Damage assessment in ANCA-associated vasculitis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2012;14:494–500.
[Article] [PubMed]

24. Murray CJ, Atkinson C, Bhalla K, U.S. Burden of Disease Collaborators, et al. The state of US health, 1990–2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. JAMA 2013;310:591–608.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

25. Tan JA, Dehghan N, Chen W, Xie H, Esdaile JM, Avina-Zubieta JA. Mortality in ANCA-associated vasculitis: ameta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1566–1574.
[Article] [PubMed]

26. van der Geest KSM, Brouwer E, Sanders JS, et al. Towards precision medicine in ANCA-associated vasculitis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2018;57:1332–1339.
[Article] [PubMed]

27. Kronbichler A, Lee KH, Denicolò S, et al. Immunopathogenesis of ANCA-associated vasculitis. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:7319.
[PubMed] [PMC]

28. Mantovani A, Garlanda C. Humoral innate immunity and acute-phase proteins. N Engl J Med 2023;388:439–452.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

29. Koo G, Ha JW, Ahn SS, Song JJ, Park YB, Lee SW. Earliest total vascular damage index scores independently predict all-cause mortality in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2024;42:795–802.
[Article] [PubMed]

30. Kronbichler A, Bajema IM, Bruchfeld A, Mastroianni Kirsztajn G, Stone JH. Diagnosis and management of ANCA-associated vasculitis. Lancet 2024;403:683–698.
[Article] [PubMed]