Agenesis of the Dorsal Pancreas: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Article information

Korean J Intern Med. 2006;21(4):236-239
Publication date (electronic) : 2006 December 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2006.21.4.236
Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
Correspondence to: Young-Eun Joo, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, 8 Hak-Dong, Dong-ku, Gwangju, 501-757, Korea. Tel: 82-62-220-6296, Fax: 82-62-225-8578, mareejb@netian.com
Received 2005 December 15; Accepted 2006 April 21.

Abstract

Partial or complete agenesis of the dorsal pancreas is a rare congenital anomaly that results from the embryological failure of the dorsal pancreatic bud to form the body and tail of the pancreas. To date, four cases have been reported in Korea. We report an additional case; a 25-year-old woman presented with diabetes mellitus and abdominal pain. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed a normal-appearing pancreatic head, but the body and tail were not visualized. Endoscopic cholangiopancreatogram (ERCP) revealed a short pancreatic duct in the uncinate process and the head and the duct of Santorini draining into the minor papilla. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were similar to the CT and ERCP results. The patient was diagnosed with partial agenesis of the dorsal pancreas by CT, ERCP and MRI.

INTRODUCTION

The pancreas develops from dorsal and ventral buds that arise from the caudal region of the embryonic foregut1). The ventral bud gives rise to the lower portion of the pancreas head and the uncinate process, while the dorsal bud elongates to form the upper head, body and tail1). Partial or complete agenesis of the dorsal pancreas is a rare congenital anomaly that results from embryologic failure of dorsal pancreatic budding in the developing fetus1-3). To date, four cases have been recorded in Korea4-7). Here we report an additional case in a 25-year-old woman with partial agenesis of the dorsal pancreas, and review the medical literature.

CASE REPORT

A 25-year-old woman was admitted to Chonnam National University Hospital with a four-week history of intermittent abdominal pain. She had an 11-year history of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. There was no previous history of peptic ulcer diseases, hepatobiliary disease, cholecystitis with gallstones or pancreatitis. On admission, her abdomen was soft and not distended, but was tender to deep palpation in the epigastric region. Physical examination was otherwise within normal limits. Laboratory evaluation revealed a white blood cell count of 5,700/mm3 (normal: 6,000-10,000), hemoglobin 11.0 g/dL (normal: 12-16), platelet count 285,000/mm3 (normal: 130,000-450,000), serum albumin 3.5 g/dL (normal: 3.0-5.0), aspartate aminotransferase 32 U/L (normal: 5-37), alanine aminotransferase 43 U/L (normal: 5-40), alkaline phosphatase 431 U/L (normal: 39-117), and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase 524 U/L (normal: 7-49). The total bilirubin was 0.38 mg/dL with 0.06 mg/dL direct fraction (normal: 0.2-1.2/0.05-0.3). Serum amylase and lipase were within normal range. An abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan showed a normal-appearing pancreatic head and complete absence of the body and tail (Figure 1A, B). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram (ERCP), opacified from the major papilla, showed a short duct in the uncinate process and head and the duct of Santorini draining into the minor papilla (Figure 2). Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a pancreatic head, but the body and tail were not visualized (Figure 3). These findings were similar to those of the CT and ERCP. The combined CT, ERCP and MRI findings were considered diagnostic of a partial agenesis of the dorsal pancreas. After symptomatic treatment, she was discharged and followed regularly.

Figure 1

Abdominal computed tomography (CT) reveals a normal-appearing pancreatic head (A) and complete absence of the body and tail (B).

Figure 2

Endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) shows a short duct in the uncinate process and head; the duct of Santorini drains into the minor papilla.

Figure 3

Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows a pancreas head only, with nonvisualization of the body and tail.

DISCUSSION

The human pancreas develops from the ventral and dorsal buds of the foregut endoderm1). The ventral bud forms the uncinate process and the posteroinferior part of the head. The Wirsung duct drains along with the bile duct through the major papilla1). The dorsal bud forms the remaining ventrosuperior part of the head, the isthmus, the body and the tail of the pancreas and drains through the Santorini duct into the minor papilla1).

Agenesis of the dorsal pancreas is derived embryologically from the absence or regression of the dorsal bud1-3). This anomaly may be partial or complete. In partial agenesis of the dorsal pancreas, the minor papilla, duct of Santorini or the pancreatic body are present. In complete agenesis of the dorsal pancreas, the neck, the body and the tail of the pancreas, duct of Santorini and minor papilla are absent8). Few cases of agenesis of the dorsal pancreas have been reported in the English literature2, 3). Most reports describe a single case presenting with diabetes mellitus, weight loss, pancreatitis, jaundice and duodenal obstruction8-12).

Only five cases of agenesis of the dorsal pancreas (including the present case) have been reported in Korea (Table 1). The patients were 36 weeks to 66 years of age and included three men and two women. Among the five cases, one was reported as a stillborn fetus at autopsy4). There were two complete and three partial types reported.

Table 1

Summary of reported cases of dorsal pancreas agenesis in Korea

In review of the English literature, diabetes mellitus has been noted in most cases with this anomaly. Also, in the Korean cases including ours, three of the four adult cases, had diabetes mellitus. Because the body and tail of the pancreas have most of islet cells, the absence of the body and tail, with this anomaly, contributes to the development of diabetes mellitus13). However, evidence of diabetes mellitus in previous reported cases has been inconsistent. Scattered islets of Langerhans with destruction of glandular parenchyma, in pancreatic head tissue, were found microscopically in the case reported by Fukuoka et al2).

Agenesis of the dorsal pancreas has been most frequently identified from imaging studies during investigation of abdominal pain. The abdominal pain has been assumed to be due to pancreatitis, duodenal obstruction, autonomic neuropathy, or sphincter of oddi dysfunction8-12). In the Korean cases including ours, three patients had abdominal pain. Among the three cases with abdominal pain, one had a common bile duct stone with pancreatitis, the cause of abdominal pain in other two cases remained undetermined.

Wildling et al and Schnedl et al reported familial occurrence of agenesis of dorsal pancreas in the mother and her sons14, 15). In these reports, the authors suggested that the genetic mode of transmission for this anomaly is most likely autosomal dominant or X-linked dominant. However, in the Korean cases including ours, there was no family history of the anomaly.

Agenesis of the dorsal pancreas is usually suggested on abdominal ultrasonogram (US), CT, or MRI when the body and tail of pancreas are not visualized ventral to the splenic vein15-21). When agenesis of the dorsal pancreas is suggested by imaging studies, diagnostic possibilities to exclude fat replacement of the pancreas and atrophy following pancreatitis should be considered. In fat replacement of pancreas, the entire gland is usually involved and the pancreatic duct is present, whereas with atrophy following pancreatitis a relevant clinical history usually exists18, 20, 22). However, imaging studies such as US, CT and MRI and a relevant clinical history are not sufficient to establish the diagnosis of agenesis of the dorsal pancreas. ERCP is necessary to confirm agenesis of the dorsal pancreas because it is important to define the anatomy of the pancreatic ducts when differentiating this anomaly from other diagnostic possibilities such as pancreatic divisum and pancreatic neoplasm15, 18, 21). However, ERCP is invasive procedure and operator-dependent for successful identification of opacity of the main and accessory pancreatic duct. By contrast, MR cholangiopancreatogram (MRCP) clearly demonstrates pancreatic duct morphology15, 18, 21). In cases where cannulating the pancreatic duct fails, MRCP may be helpful. Therefore, the combined use of CT and ERCP or MRCP is useful for confirmation of the diagnosis of agenesis of dorsal pancreas15, 18, 21). In the reported Korean cases, the diagnosis was suspected by CT, but an ERCP was required for confirmation. Only one case underwent a laparotomy for confirmation due to the possibility of a pancreatic neoplasm6).

In Korea, agenesis of dorsal pancreas is a very rare congenital anomaly that may be associated with diabetes mellitus and abdominal pain. However, hereditary mechanisms may play a role in the development of this anomaly but remains to be further clarified. If agenesis of the dorsal pancreas is suspected, the combined use of CT and ERCP or MRCP is needed for confirmation of the diagnosis.

References

1. Kozu T, Suda K, Toki F. Pancreatic development and anatomical variation. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1995;5:1–30. 7728339.
2. Fukuoka K, Ajiki T, Yamamoto M, Fujiwara H, Onoyama H, Fujita T, Katayama N, Mizuguchi K, Ikuta H, Kuroda Y, Hanioka K. Complete agenesis of the dorsal pancreas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 1999;6:94–97. 10436244.
3. Wang JT, Lin JT, Chuang CN, Wang SM, Chuang LM, Chen JC, Huang SH, Chen DS, Wang TH. Complete agenesis of the dorsal pancreas: a case report and review of the literature. Pancreas 1990;5:493–497. 2199969.
4. Park WS, Yang KH, Kang SJ, Kim BK, Kim SM. Agenesis of the dorsal pancreas: an autopsy case. Korean J Pathol 1992;26:71–75.
5. Choi D, Lim JH, Lee KT. Congenital short pancreas associated with pancreatitis: a case report. J Korean Radiol Soc 1998;38:1065–1067.
6. Park SH, Roe IH, Lee MI, Yun SY, Tak WT, Yoo K, Kim JT. A case of complete agenesis of dorsal pancreas. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2000;20:227–230.
7. Kim MJ, Seo GD, Kim SH, Kim ID, Heo JH, Jo SR. A case of partial agenesis of dorsal pancreas. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2001;23:197–200.
8. Klein WA, Dabezies MA, Friedman AC, Caroline DF, Boden GH, Cohen S. Agenesis of dorsal pancreas in a patient with weight loss and diabetes mellitus. Dig Dis Sci 1994;39:1708–1713. 8050322.
9. Oldenburg B, van Leeuwen MS, van Berge Henegouwen GP, Koningsberger JC. Pancreatitis and agenesis of the dorsal pancreas. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998;10:887–889. 9831413.
10. Nishimori I, Okazaki K, Morita M, Miyao M, Sakamoto Y, Kagiyama S, Yamamoto Y, Yamamoto Y. Congenital hypoplasia of the dorsal pancreas: with special reference to duodenal papillary dysfunction. Am J Gastroenterol 1990;85:1029–1033. 2197855.
11. Lechner GW, Read RC. Agenesis of the dorsal pancreas in an adult diabetic presenting with duodenal ileus. Ann Surg 1966;163:311–314. 5906622.
12. Guclu M, Serin E, Ulucan S, Kul K, Ozer B, Gumurdulu Y, Pata C, Cosar A, Gur G, Boyacioglu S. Agenesis of the dorsal pancreas in a patient with recurrent acute pancreatitis: case report and review. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60:472–475. 15332050.
13. Wittingen J, Frey CF. Islet concentration in the head, body, tail and uncinate process of the pancreas. Ann Surg 1974;179:412–414. 4593099.
14. Wildling R, Schnedl WJ, Reisinger EC, Schreiber F, Lipp RW, Lederer A, Krejs GJ. Agenesis of the dorsal pancreas in a woman with diabetes mellitus and in both of her sons. Gastroenterology 1993;104:1182–1186. 8462806.
15. Schnedl WJ, Reisinger EC, Schreiber F, Pieber TR, Lipp RW, Krejs GJ. Complete and partial agenesis of the dorsal pancreas within one family. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;42:485–487. 8566643.
16. Deignan RW, Nizzero A, Malone DE. Case report: agenesis of the dorsal pancreas: a cause of diagnostic error on abdominal sonography. Clin Radiol 1996;51:145–147. 8631173.
17. Nonent M, Linard J, Leveque E, Larroche P, Bobeuf J, Senecail B. Dorsal pancreas agenesis: computed tomography appearance with three-dimensional volume rendering reconstruction. Surg Radiol Anat 2003;25:161–163. 12851784.
18. Macari M, Giovanniello G, Blair L, Krinsky G. Diagnosis of agenesis of the dorsal pancreas with MR pancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:144–146. 9423620.
19. Shah KK, DeRidder PH, Schwab RE, Alexander TJ. CT diagnosis of dorsal pancreas agenesis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11:170–171. 3805410.
20. Gold RP. Agenesis and pseudo-agenesis of the dorsal pancreas. Abdom Imaging 1993;18:141–144. 8439753.
21. Itoh H, Saito M, Ishimori M, Ohshiro K, Guo YY, Sakai T. A case report of dorsal pancreas agenesis diagnosed by MRI and ERCP. Radiat Med 1991;9:108–109. 1924843.
22. Park CM, Han JK, Kim TK, Choi BI. Fat replacement with absence of acinar and ductal structure in the pancreatic body and tail. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000;24:893–895. 11105708.

Article information Continued

Figure 1

Abdominal computed tomography (CT) reveals a normal-appearing pancreatic head (A) and complete absence of the body and tail (B).

Figure 2

Endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) shows a short duct in the uncinate process and head; the duct of Santorini drains into the minor papilla.

Figure 3

Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows a pancreas head only, with nonvisualization of the body and tail.

Table 1

Summary of reported cases of dorsal pancreas agenesis in Korea

Table 1