High vegetable consumption and regular exercise are associated with better quality of life in patients with gout

Article information

Korean J Intern Med. 2024;.kjim.2023.476
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 June 24
doi : https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2023.476
1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
2Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
3Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
4Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Eulji University School of Medicine, Uijeongbu, Korea
5Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
6Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
7Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju, Korea
8Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
9Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
10Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
11Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soon Chun Hyang University Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
12Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
13Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
14Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
15Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Korea
Correspondence to: Ki Won Moon, M.D., Ph.D., Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon, National University School of Medicine, 156 Baengnyeong-ro, Chuncheon, 24289, Korea, Tel: +82-33-258-9470, Fax: +82-33-258-2455, E-mail: drkwmoon@gmail.com
Received 2023 November 4; Revised 2023 December 11; Accepted 2024 February 5.

Abstract

Background/Aims

The Gout Impact Scale (GIS), a part of the Gout Assessment Questionnaire 2.0, is used to measure gout-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Although several studies have been conducted on the factors affecting the HRQOL of patients with gout, few have focused on lifestyle factors. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between lifestyle habits and HRQOL using the GIS in patients with gout.

Methods

We used data from the Urate-Lowering TheRApy in Gout (ULTRA) registry, a prospective cohort of Korean patients with gout treated at multiple centers nationwide. The patients were aged ≥18 years and met the 2015 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism gout classification criteria. They were asked to complete a GIS and questions regarding their lifestyle habits at enrollment.

Results

The study included 232 patients. ‘Gout concern overall’ scores in the GIS were significantly lower in patients who exercised more frequently and consumed soft drinks and meat less, and ‘well-being during attack’ scores were significantly lower in patients who consumed vegetables and exercised more frequently. The frequency of vegetable consumption had a negative linear relationship with the ‘well-being during attack’ and ‘gout concern during attack’ scores (p = 0.01, p = 0.001, respectively). The frequency of exercise had a negative linear relationship with the ‘gout concern overall’ and ‘gout concern during attack’ scores (p = 0.04 and p = 0.002, respectively).

Conclusions

Patients with gout who frequently consumed vegetables and exercised regularly experienced less impact of gout, exhibiting a better GIS that represented HRQOL.

Graphical abstract

INTRODUCTION

Gout, a prevalent form of inflammatory arthritis, is generally considered to be more effectively managed through medications and lifestyle changes than other types of inflammatory arthritis [1]. Patients with gout are recommended long-term urate-lowering therapy (ULT) as well as modification of their lifestyle habits, including dietary habits [2,3]. An improper lifestyle may hinder the control of gout and affect the quality of life of patients [4].

To date, several tools have been used to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with gout, including the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), disability index of the HAQ, and 36-item Short-Form Survey [5]. However, because these tools are inadequate for assessing patients with less severe disease, more disease-specific assessment tools are required to determine the severity of gout in such patients. With an increasing focus on patient-reported outcomes related to gout, a gout-specific HRQOL measure, the Gout Assessment Questionnaire (GAQ) version 1.0, was developed in 2006 [6]. Subsequently, the GAQ version 2.0 and its subscale, the Gout Impact Scale (GIS), consisting of a section describing the impact of gout on HRQOL, were developed and used [613]. Recently, the Korean version of the GIS was validated regarding internal consistency and reliability among Korean patients with gout [11,1417].

Several studies have been conducted on factors affecting the HRQOL of patients. However, only few of them have focused on the effects of lifestyle habits. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the correlation between lifestyle habits and HRQOL using the GIS in Korean patients with gout.

METHODS

Participants

For this study, we used responses of patients enrolled in the ‘aftermath of Urate-Lowering TheRApy in gout (ULTRA)’ registry [18]. The ULTRA registry is a prospective cohort of Korean patients with gout treated at multiple centers nationwide since September 2021. Patients with gout aged ≥ 18 years who fulfill the 2015 classification criteria for gout necessitating ULT were enrolled [19]. The enrolled patients had no history of receiving ULT within 4 weeks and met the following criteria: two or more gout flares in a year, erosions present in radiographs of the hands or feet, or other reasons for which ULT was deemed necessary.

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kangwon National University Hospital (approval no.: KNUH_2023-05-006). This study was conducted in accordance with good clinical practice and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in the ULTRA registry and for secondary research at the time of enrollment.

Clinical variables of participants

The case report form lists demographic and clinical data, including the number of attacks, comorbidities, lifestyle habits, medications, quality of life (using the GIS questionnaire), EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) scale score, laboratory results, including serum urate level, and radiological results. Laboratory results were collected on the ULTRA registry enrollment date (baseline assessment, day 0).

Patients completed the EQ-5D to assess generic HRQOL, as validated for the Korean population [20,21] on their enrollment date (baseline assessment, day 0). The EQ-5D consists of five domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each assessed using a single item with response levels of ‘no problem,’ some problem,’ and ‘extreme problem.’ The EQ-5D score was determined using an EQ-5D value set that was developed based on the preferences of the Korean population for EQ-5D-related health conditions [2023].

Lifestyle habits were also investigated at enrollment (baseline assessment, day 0) using a specially designed questionnaire. Each item was evaluated and categorized on a scale of 2–3. The consumption of alcohol, coffee, soft drinks, meat, dairy products, vegetables, and fruits per week as well as the number of exercise sessions performed per week was also assessed. All patients underwent blood tests for a complete blood count and routine chemistry panel including urate, urine analysis, C-reactive protein concentration, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

GIS

The GIS questionnaire comprises 24 items related to 5 distinct subscales: (1) gout concern overall (questions Q1 a–d), (2) gout medication side effects (Q1 e, k), (3) unmet gout treatment needs (Q1 i, l, m), (4) well-being during attack (Q2–d, Q3–g), and (5) gout concern during attack (Q1 f–h, j). All GIS response options were provided on a 5-point Likert scale (e.g., from strongly agree to strongly disagree or from all of the time to none of the time). The GIS response options 1–5 were converted to a scale of 100–0 (1 = 100, 2 = 75, 3 = 50, 4 = 25, and 5 = 0) for Q1 a–h, j–l, and 2 a–d, and a scale of 0–100 (1 = 0, 2 = 25, 3 = 50, 4 = 75, and 5 = 100) for Q1 i, m, and 3 a–g. The 5 GIS subscale scores were calculated as the average scores of the questions included in each GIS subscale (Supplementary Table 1). The overall GIS score was calculated as the average score of all 24 questions. A higher subscale score indicated a more severe condition or more significant impact of gout [17,24,25]. Patients were asked to complete the lifestyle questionnaire on their ULTRA registry enrollment date (baseline assessment, day 0).

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used for all variables. Categorical variables are presented as percentages and frequencies, whereas continuous variables are presented as means and standard deviations (SDs). Pearson’s correlation analysis was conducted to verify the correlation between the EQ-5D-3L and GIS.

A two-tailed Student’s t-test was conducted to examine differences in GIS scores between subgroups according to gout-specific characteristics. A two-sided p value of < 0.05. was considered significant. The variables categorized into several scales for each item were converted into continuous variables according to the degree of the scale in the linear regression analysis. We evaluated the linear relationship between the GIS subscales and lifestyle habits using a multiple linear regression analysis. First, a simple linear regression analysis was performed using the number of times coffee, soft drinks, meat, dairy, vegetables, and fruit were consumed as independent variables. Subsequently, a stepwise linear regression analysis was performed by selecting significant items in the simple regression analysis. Chi-square tests were conducted to determine whether the presence of malignancy and the number of comorbidities varied based on vegetable consumption frequency and exercise frequency. All statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS Statistics software (version 26.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of patients

The study included 232 patients whose baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. The mean ± SD age was 55.08 ± 17.69 years, and 90.5% of the patients were men. The disease duration was 4.97 ± 6.41 years. Overall, 48.8% of the patients had a bachelor’s degree or higher, and 61.7% were employed. Most patients (90.7%) received ULT, and the mean serum urate concentration was 8.63 ± 1.90 mg/ dL. Approximately 24.2% of the patients had tophi, while 79.8% reported experiencing acute gout flares more than twice a year. Hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity, affecting 49.1% of the patients, followed by hyperlipidemia (29.3%), diabetes (18.1%), and chronic kidney disease (12.5%). Of the total patients, 10.0% had a history of malignancy.

Baseline characteristics of patients

GIS subscale and EQ-5D-3L scores

The mean scores for each GIS subscale (ranging from 0 to 100) at their enrollment date were as follows: 80.27 ± 18.63 for gout concern overall; 64.39 ± 21.47 for gout medication side effects; 47.20 ± 13.28 for unmet gout treatment needs; 55.27 ± 26.56 for well-being during attack; and 61.63 ± 22.28 for gout concern during attack (Table 2). The EQ-5D-3L mobility exhibited significant correlations (0.14 with the gout concern overall, 0.14 with unmet gout treatment needs, and 0.14 with gout concern during attacks). Overall, self-care exhibited significant correlations (0.13 with gout concern and usual activity demonstrated correlations of 0.13 with the well-being during attack, 0.15 with gout concern during the attack). The pain/discomfort item in the EQ-5D-3L indicated a significant correlation with the unmet gout treatment needs subscale in the GIS. Anxiety/depression exhibited significant correlations of 0.18 with the gout concern overall, 0.20 with well-being during attack, and 0.27 with gout concern during attacks (Table 3).

Patient-reported outcome measurements

Pearson correlation for Gout Impact Scales with EQ-5D-3L

GIS subscale scores according to clinical feature and lifestyle factors

Table 4 summarizes the differences in GIS subscale scores according to lifestyle habits. The ‘gout concern overall’ score differed between the group that consumed soft drinks less than three times a week and those that consumed soft drinks at least three times a week (78.97 ± 18.95 vs. 85.57 ± 16.24, p = 0.04). Patients who ate meat less than three times a week had a lower ‘gout concern overall’ score than those who consumed meat at least three times a week (78.08 ±19.97 vs. 83.25 ± 16.28, p = 0.04). Patients who exercised at least three times a week had a lower ‘gout concern overall’ score than those who exercised less than three times a week (76.07 ± 21.29 vs. 81.89 ± 17.29, p = 0.03).

Gout Impact Scale subscale scores according to lifestyle factors

The ‘gout medication side effects’ and ‘unmet gout treatment needs’ scores did not significantly differ according to lifestyle factors. Patients who consumed vegetables less than five times a week had a higher ‘well-being during attack’ score than those who consumed vegetables at least five times a week (58.97 ± 27.09 vs. 50.26 ± 25.10, p = 0.02). Patients who exercised at least three times a week had a lower ‘well-being during attack’ score than those who exercised less than three times a week (49.25 ± 25.95 vs. 57.65 ± 26.50, p = 0.03).

Patients who consumed vegetables less than five times a week had a higher ‘gout concern during attack’ score than those who consumed vegetables at least five times a week (66.32 ± 22.57 vs. 55.99 ± 19.70, p < 0.001). Patients who exercised at least three times a week had a lower ‘gout concern during attack’ score than those who exercised less than three times a week (53.77 ± 19.00 vs. 64.98 ± 22.25, p < 0.001).

Patients who experienced three or more gout attacks in the past year exhibited significantly higher GIS scores in ‘gout concern overall,’ ‘gout medication side effects,’ ‘well-being during attack,’ and ‘gout concern during attack’ subscales. Additionally, in the group where serum urate levels were >6 mg/dL, significantly higher GIS scores were observed in the ‘gout medication side effects’ and ‘unmet gout treatment needs’ subscales (Supplementary Table 2).

According to the chi-square results, no significant differences in vegetable consumption or exercise frequency were observed based on the presence of a history of malignancy or the number of comorbidities (p = 0.33, 0.77, 0.09, and 0.24, respectively) (Supplementary Table 3, 4).

Multiple linear regression analysis of lifestyle factors and GIS subscale scores

Table 5 displays the results of the multiple regression analysis of the GIS subscale scores for vegetable consumption and exercise. The ‘gout concern overall’ score was negatively correlated with exercise frequency (β = −0.14, 95% CI = −11.08 to −0.34, p = 0.04). The ‘well-being during attack’ score was negatively correlated with vegetable consumption (β = −0.17, 95% CI = −15.89 to −1.90, p = 0.01). The ‘gout concern during attack’ score was negatively correlated with vegetable consumption and exercise frequency (β = −0.22 and −0.20, 95% CI = −15.24 to −4.16 and −15.81 to −3.56, respectively; both p < 0.01).

Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis of the K-GIS in gout patients

DISCUSSION

This study provides valuable information regarding the correlation between lifestyle factors and HRQOL in patients with gout. In this study, the correlation analysis revealed a relationship with the established quality of life assessment tool, EQ-5D-3L, demonstrating that the GIS is valid for evaluating the quality of life in patients with gout.

Several lifestyle factors demonstrated significant negative linear relationships with GIS subscale scores.

In a previous study, serum urate concentration, number of comorbidities, presence of bone erosion, and use of ULT were correlated with HRQOL in patients with gout [7]. Patients with higher urate concentrations (> 6 mg/dL) had higher ‘gout concern overall’ scores, and patients with more than three comorbidities had higher scores for ‘gout concern overall’ and ‘well-being during attack’ Patients who experienced more gout attacks had higher ‘gout concern during attack’ scores. Patients with bony erosions had higher ‘gout concern overall’ scores [7,16,17,20,21]. As previously observed in earlier results, the overall GIS score was higher in groups with elevated serum urate levels and those who experienced numerous gout attacks in the past year [17]. Additionally, eating habits (consumption of soft drinks, meat, and vegetables) and regular exercise were significantly related to HRQOL, specifically gout concern overall, well-being during an attack, and gout concern during an attack. No significant differences in vegetable consumption frequency or exercise frequency based on the presence of a history of malignancy or the number of comorbidities (Supplementary Table 3, 4). However, side effects of gout medication and unmet gout treatment needs were not significantly correlated with lifestyle habits. These subscales are related to therapeutic intervention, including drug administration, drug response, and side effects [16,24,25]. Hence, lifestyle habits may be more directly related to quality of life than to drug-related HRQOL.

Our results suggest that regular vegetable consumption and exercise can affect HRQOL in patients with gout. According to a previous study, moderate intake of purine-rich vegetables was not associated with an increased risk of gout [26]. Not all vegetables worsen gout; consumption of vegetables, even those high in purines, such as spinach and asparagus, reportedly does not increase the risk of gout attacks [27]. Moreover, vegetables contain many beneficial ingredients that control gout, including vitamin C, catechin, flavonoids, other antioxidants, potassium, and fiber [28]. Vitamin C eliminates reactive oxygen species released by urate [2931]. Potassium lowers blood pressure by improving endothelium-dependent vasodilation. Antioxidant effects of catechins and flavonoids exhibit anti-oxidative effects [27]. Our research proves that higher vegetable consumption is related to a better quality of life in patients with gout.

In our study, coffee consumption was not associated with the HRQOL. To date, no studies have indicated that coffee consumption directly affects the quality of life of patients with gout. A meta-analysis has revealed that coffee can lower urate levels and prevent gout attacks [32]. Thus, although coffee may affect urate concentrations in the blood, it does not seem to contribute to gout-related quality of life. In this study, the ‘gout concern during attack’ value in non-current drinkers (never or past drinkers) was significantly higher than in current drinkers in the GIS subscale. Patients with high ‘gout concern during attack’ scores may have refrained from or stopped drinking because of concerns regarding gout attacks. These findings are consistent with those of a previous study. Chandratre et al. have reported that infrequent or non-drinkers had worse quality of life compared with daily alcohol drinkers [33]. Low-to-moderate exercise reduces inflammation and pain in patients with gout by downregulating TLR2 and CXCL1 expressions [34]. Our study confirmed that regular exercise improved the quality of life in patients with gout.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first multicenter study to reveal the correlation between GIS scores and lifestyle factors in Korean patients with gout. We identified a negative correlation between GIS score and vegetable consumption. A negative correlation was also observed between GIS scores and regular exercise. Since this was a cross-sectional study, the explanation for the direct causal relationship is limited. Nevertheless, the study findings can suggest a relationship between quality of life and lifestyle. Therefore, we advised the patients to exercise and eat vegetables more frequently. Meanwhile, our study has several strengths. The questionnaires used in this study were specific to lifestyle habits including exercise frequency and consumption of alcohol, coffee, soft drinks, meat, dairy products, vegetables, and fruits. Thus, clinicians should encourage patients with gout to consume more vegetables and exercise regularly. Few tools are available to control gout flares. Nevertheless, our research may help patients improve their quality of life through lifestyle modifications. However, this study has several limitations. Statistical analysis in this study was conducted based on the frequency of exercise and food and drink consumption but not on the degree/amount. Therefore, further research is required to determine whether the degree of exercise and the amount of food or drink consumed are related to HRQOL in patients with gout. Another limitation is that our results revealed a negative relevance; however, additional data and elements may be required to explain a clear causal relationship.

In conclusion, this study presents objective data on how patients with gout can manage their quality of life daily. Specifically, increasing vegetable consumption and exercise could potentially contribute to improving patients’ quality of life.

KEY MESSAGE

1. Eating habits (consumption of soft drinks, meat, and vegetables) and regular exercise were significantly related to HRQOL, specifically gout concern overall, well-being during an attack, and gout concern during an attack.

2. Higher vegetable consumption is related to a better quality of life in patients with gout. Regular exercise improved the quality of life in patients with gout.

3. This study presents objective data on how patients with gout can manage their quality of life daily. Specifically, increasing vegetable consumption and exercise could potentially contribute to improving patient’s quality of life.

Supplementary Information

Notes

CRedit authorship contributions

Hyunsue Do: conceptualization, formal analysis, writing - original draft, writing - review & editing, funding acquisition; Hyo Jin Choi: writing - review & editing; Byoongyong Choi: writing - review & editing; Chang-Nam Son: writing - review & editing; Sang-Hyon Kim: writing - review & editing; You-Jung Ha: writing - review & editing; Ji Hyoun Kim: writing - review & editing; Min Jung Kim: writing - review & editing; Kichul Shin: writing - review & editing; Hyun-Ok Kim: writing - review & editing; Ran Song: writing - review & editing; Sung Won Lee: writing - review & editing; Joong Kyong Ahn: writing - review & editing; Seung-Geun Lee: writing - review & editing; Chang Hoon Lee: writing - review & editing; Kyeong Min Son: writing - review & editing; Ki Won Moon: conceptualization, data curation, writing - review & editing, funding acquisition

Conflicts of interest

The authors disclose no conflicts.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the Patient-Centered Clinical Research Coordinating Center funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HC21C0010) and a 2023 Kangwon National University Hospital Grant (no. KNUH_2023-05-006).

References

1. Roddy E, Doherty M. Epidemiology of gout. Arthritis Res Ther 2010;12:223.
2. Sundy JS, Baraf HS, Yood RA, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of pegloticase for the treatment of chronic gout in patients refractory to conventional treatment: two randomized controlled trials. JAMA 2011;306:711–720.
3. Doherty M, Jenkins W, Richardson H, et al. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nurse-led care involving education and engagement of patients and a treat-to-target urate-lowering strategy versus usual care for gout: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2018;392:1403–1412.
4. Aung T, Myung G, FitzGerald JD. Treatment approaches and adherence to urate-lowering therapy for patients with gout. Patient Prefer Adherence 2017;11:795–800.
5. Singh JA, Taylor WJ, Simon LS, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in chronic gout: a report from OMERACT 10. J Rheumatol 2011;38:1452–1457.
6. Colwell HH, Hunt BJ, Pasta DJ, Palo WA, Mathias SD, Joseph- Ridge N. Gout Assessment Questionnaire: initial results of reliability, validity and responsiveness. Int J Clin Pract 2006;60:1210–1217.
7. Roddy E, Zhang W, Doherty M. Is gout associated with reduced quality of life? A case-control study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46:1441–1444.
8. Lee SJ, Hirsch JD, Terkeltaub R, et al. Perceptions of disease and health-related quality of life among patients with gout. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009;48:582–586.
9. Proudman C, Lester SE, Gonzalez-Chica DA, Gill TK, Dalbeth N, Hill CL. Gout, flares, and allopurinol use: a population-based study. Arthritis Res Ther 2019;21:132.
10. Hirsch JD, Lee SJ, Terkeltaub R, et al. Evaluation of an instrument assessing influence of Gout on health-related quality of life. J Rheumatol 2008;35:2406–2414.
11. Spaetgens B, van der Linden S, Boonen A. The Gout Assessment Questionnaire 2.0: cross-cultural translation into Dutch, aspects of validity and linking to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014;53:678–685.
12. Phrintrakul N, Wongthanee A, Kasitanon N, Louthrenoo W. Translation, internal consistency, reliability and validity of the Thai version of Gout Assessment Questionnaire version 2.0 (GAQ 2.0). Clin Rheumatol 2022;41:2129–2141.
13. Pao CH, Ko Y. An assessment of the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Gout Impact Scale. Curr Med Res Opin 2020;36:17–21.
14. Mazur W, Kupiainen H, Pitkäniemi J, et al. Comparison between the disease-specific Airways Questionnaire 20 and the generic 15D instruments in COPD. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2011;9:4.
15. Wallace B, Khanna D, Aquino-Beaton C, et al. Performance of Gout Impact Scale in a longitudinal observational study of patients with gout. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016;55:982–990.
16. Yang P, Chen Z, Chen YT, et al. Use of the Gout Impact Scale to evaluate quality of life in Chinese subjects with gout: a cross-sectional study. Med Sci Monit 2020;26:e925593.
17. Kim MJ, Kim JY, Lee JJ, Moon KW, Shin K. Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Gout Impact Scale. J Korean Med Sci 2023;38:e266.
18. Moon KW, Kim MJ, Shin K. The aftermath of Urate-Lowering TheRApy in gout (ULTRA) registry: the first prospective observational multicenter cohort of Korean patients with gout. Int J Rheum Dis 2023;26:1015–1018.
19. Neogi T, Jansen TL, Dalbeth N, et al. 2015 Gout classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:1789–1798.
20. Bae SC, Cook EF, Kim SY. Psychometric evaluation of a Korean Health Assessment Questionnaire for clinical research. J Rheumatol 1998;25:1975–1979.
21. Kim MH, Cho YS, Uhm WS, Kim S, Bae SC. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the EQ-5D in patients with rheumatic diseases. Qual Life Res 2005;14:1401–1406.
22. Bruce B, Fries JF. The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: dimensions and practical applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:20.
23. Lee YK, Nam HS, Chuang LH, et al. South Korean time tradeoff values for EQ-5D health states: modeling with observed values for 101 health states. Value Health 2009;12:1187–1193.
24. Hirsch JD, Terkeltaub R, Khanna D, et al. Gout disease-specific quality of life and the association with gout characteristics. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 2010;2010:1–8.
25. La-Crette J, Jenkins W, Fernandes G, Valdes AM, Doherty M, Abhishek A. First validation of the gout activity score against gout impact scale in a primary care based gout cohort. Joint Bone Spine 2018;85:323–325.
26. Choi HK, Atkinson K, Karlson EW, Willett W, Curhan G. Purine-rich foods, dairy and protein intake, and the risk of gout in men. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1093–1103.
27. Koguchi T. Modification of dietary habits for prevention of gout in Japanese people: gout and food intake. Am J Health Res 2021;9:158–175.
28. Juraschek SP, Miller ER 3rd, Wu B, et al. A randomized pilot study of DASH patterned groceries on serum urate in individuals with gout. Nutrients 2021;13:538.
29. Huang HY, Appel LJ, Choi MJ, et al. The effects of vitamin C supplementation on serum concentrations of uric acid: results of a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:1843–1847.
30. Juraschek SP, White K, Tang O, Yeh HC, Cooper LA, Miller ER 3rd. Effects of a Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet intervention on serum uric acid in African Americans with hypertension. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2018;70:1509–1516.
31. Kumar B, Lenert P. Gout and African Americans: reducing disparities. Cleve Clin J Med 2016;83:665–674.
32. Park KY, Kim HJ, Ahn HS, et al. Effects of coffee consumption on serum uric acid: systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2016;45:580–586.
33. Chandratre P, Mallen C, Richardson J, et al. Health-related quality of life in gout in primary care: baseline findings from a cohort study. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2018;48:61–69.
34. Jablonski K, Young NA, Henry C, et al. Physical activity prevents acute inflammation in a gout model by downregulation of TLR2 on circulating neutrophils as well as inhibition of serum CXCL1 and is associated with decreased pain and inflammation in gout patients. PLoS One 2020;15:e0237520.

Article information Continued

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of patients

Variable Patients (n = 232) Missing value (%)
Age (yr) 55.08 ± 17.69 0
Men 210 (90.5) 0
Height (cm) 168.90 ± 8.02 0.43
Weight (kg) 75.97 ± 14.85 0.43
Body mass index (kg/m2) 26.47 ± 3.99 0.43
Education status
 Low 110/215 (51.2) 7.33
 Higha) 105/215 (48.8) 7.33
Currently employed 142/230 (61.7) 0.86
Smoking status
 Current 57/226 (25.2) 2.59
 Ever 85/226 (37.6) 2.59
 Never 84/226 (37.2) 2.59
Current alcohol consumer 146/231 (63.2) 0.43
Comorbidities
 Hypertension 114 (49.1) 0
 Diabetes 42 (18.1) 0
 Dyslipidemia 68 (29.3) 0
 Cardiovascular disease 23 (9.9) 0
 Liver disease 6 (2.6) 0
 Chronic kidney disease 29 (12.5) 0
 Kidney transplantation 0 (0) 0
 Malignancy 23/231 (10.0) 0.43
Concomitant medications
 Diuretics 48 (20.7) 0
 Losartan 8 (3.4) 0
 Aspirin 24 (10.3) 0
Disease duration (yr) 4.97 ± 6.41 0
Presence of tophi 51/211 (24.2) 9.1
Presence of erosion on X-ray 51/152 (33.6) 34.48
Acute gout flare (more than twice in the past year) 178/223 (79.8) 3.88
Number of previous acute flares
 0 11/219 (5.0) 5.60
 1–2 84/219 (38.4) 5.60
 3–5 72/219 (32.9) 5.60
 6–10 34/219 (15.5) 5.60
 > 10 18/219 (8.2) 5.60
Urate-lowering therapyb) 204/225 (90.7) 2.59
 Allopurinol 35/225 (15.6) 2.59
 Febuxostat 150/225 (66.7) 2.59
 Benzbromarone 21/225 (9.3) 2.59
 Febuxostat + benzbromarone 1/225 (0.4) 2.59
Anti-inflammatory prophylaxis
 Steroid 54 (23.3) 0
 NSAIDs 83 (35.8) 0
 Colchicine 134 (57.8) 0
Serum urate concentration (mg/dL) 8.63 ± 1.90 4.74
Serum creatinine concentration (mg/dL) 1.10 ± 0.35 5.60
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) 78.91 ± 26.42 9.05

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or frequency (%).

NSAIDs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

a)

Bachelor’s degree or higher.

b)

Urate-lowering therapy group assigned at enrollment date.

Table 2

Patient-reported outcome measurements

Questionnaires Score (n = 232)
Gout Impact Scale (0–100)
 Gout concern overall 80.27 ± 18.63
 Gout medication side effects 64.39 ± 21.47
 Unmet gout treatment needs 47.20 ± 13.28
 Well-being during attack 55.27 ± 26.56
 Gout concern during attack 61.63 ± 22.28
EQ-5D-3L (1–3)
 Mobility 1.52 ± 0.62
 Self-care 1.22 ± 0.47
 Usual activity 1.46 ± 0.61
 Pain/discomfort 1.78 ± 0.67
 Anxiety/depression 1.37 ± 0.59

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

EQ-5D-3L, EuroQol-5 dimension-3 level.

Table 3

Pearson correlation for Gout Impact Scales with EQ-5D-3L

EQ-5D-3L Gout concern overall Gout medication side effects Unmet gout treatment needs Well-being during attack Gout concern during attack
Mobility 0.14* 0.04 0.14* 0.11 0.14*
Self-care 0.13* 0.03 0.03 0.10 0.10
Usual activity 0.12 0.04 0.05 0.13* 0.15*
Pain/discomfort 0.10 0.07 0.14* 0.08 0.11
Anxiety/depression 0.18** 0.09 −0.03 0.20* 0.27**

EQ-5D-3L, EuroQol-5 dimension-3 level.

*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01.

Table 4

Gout Impact Scale subscale scores according to lifestyle factors

Lifestyle factors Gout Impact Scale
Gout concern overall Gout medication side effects Unmet gout treatment needs Well-being during attack Gout concern during attack
Alcohol consumption
 Non-current drinker (n = 85) 81.54 ± 19.21 66.07 ± 21.92 47.25 ± 12.75 58.27 ± 23.44 66.52 ± 19.54
 Current drinker (n = 146) 79.51 ± 18.31 63.39 ± 21.22 47.16 ± 13.63 53.53 ± 28.15 59.22 ± 22.87
p value 0.43 0.37 0.96 0.196 0.015*
Coffee consumption
 Non-drinker (n = 90) 81.81 ± 18.02 64.44 ± 24.21 48.61 ± 13.76 59.12 ± 27.61 63.76 ± 22.02
 ≥ 1/d (n = 141) 79.29 ± 19.01 64.35 ± 19.53 46.28 ± 12.93 52.77 ± 25.65 60.71 ± 21.90
p value 0.32 0.98 0.2 0.08 0.31
Soft drink consumption
 < 3 times/wk (n = 188) 78.97 ± 18.95 63.46 ± 20.98 46.55 ± 12.78 55.04 ± 26.46 62.26 ± 21.73
 ≥ 3 times/wk (n = 42) 85.57 ± 16.24 67.99 ± 23.39 50.00 ± 15.29 55.99 ± 27.56 59.38 ± 22.48
p value 0.04* 0.22 0.13 0.84 0.44
Meat consumption
 < 3 times/wk (n = 133) 78.08 ± 19.97 62.31 ± 21.82 46.84 ± 13.01 55.09 ± 25.87 62.69 ± 21.34
 ≥ 3 times/wk (n = 98) 83.25 ± 16.28 67.29 ± 20.75 47.68 ± 13.70 55.52 ± 27.61 60.84 ± 22.80
p value 0.04* 0.09 0.64 0.91 0.53
Dairy consumption
 < 3 times/wk (n = 180) 80.62 ± 18.85 64.06 ± 21.90 46.85 ± 13.42 55.14 ± 27.19 61.70 ± 23.41
 ≥ 3 times/wk (n = 51) 79.04 ± 17.98 65.56 ± 20.01 48.47 ± 12.81 55.70 ± 24.52 62.63 ± 15.80
p value 0.6 0.67 0.45 0.9 0.79
Vegetable consumption
 < 5 times/wk (n = 132) 81.25 ± 19.33 66.15 ± 22.53 48.04 ± 13.65 58.97 ± 27.09 66.32 ± 22.57
 ≥ 5 times/wk (n = 99) 78.95 ± 17.66 61.97 ± 19.80 46.05 ± 12.73 50.26 ± 25.10 55.99 ± 19.70
p value 0.36 0.15 0.26 0.02* < 0.001***
Fruit consumption
 < 5 times/wk (n = 173) 80.23 ± 18.98 65.25 ± 21.69 47.72 ± 13.49 56.85 ± 26.45 63.05 ± 22.46
 ≥ 5 times/wk (n = 58) 80.37 ± 17.69 61.84 ± 20.79 45.61 ± 12.61 50.60 ± 26.59 58.44 ± 20.13
p value 0.96 0.3 0.3 0.13 0.17
Exercise
 < 3 times/wk (n = 166) 81.89 ± 17.29 65.93 ± 21.69 46.99 ± 12.65 57.65 ± 26.50 64.98 ± 22.25
 ≥ 3 times/wk (n = 65) 76.07 ± 21.29 60.25 ± 20.48 47.75 ± 14.91 49.25 ± 25.95 53.77 ± 19.00
p value 0.03* 0.08 0.7 0.03* < 0.001***
Education status
 Low 78.24 ± 19.38 62.38 ±22.57 48.77 ± 13.57 52.76 ± 27.79 61.00 ± 23.31
 Higha) 82.15 ± 18.61 67.48 ± 20.21 46.07 ± 12.98 58.74 ± 25.69 64.54 ±20.73
p value 0.14 0.09 0.14 0.11 0.24
Employed
 Not current 78.55 ± 20.67 63.97 ± 21.86 49.03 ± 13.19 51.49 ± 26.16 62.57 ±19.75
 Current 81.47 ± 17.31 65.13 ±21.06 46.10 ± 13.27 58.01 ± 26.62 61.65 ± 23.36
p value 0.25 0.70 0.11 0.07 0.76

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

Two-tailed Student’s t-test statistical analysis.

*

p < 0.05;

***

p < 0.001.

Table 5

Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis of the K-GIS in gout patients

GIS subscale and lifestyle factor β SE t value p value 95% CI
Gout concern overall
 Exercise −0.14 2.73 −2.10 0.04* −11.08, −0.34
Well-being during attack
 Vegetable consumption −0.17 3.55 −2.51 0.01* −15.89, −1.90
Gout concern during attack
 Vegetable consumption −0.22 2.81 −3.45 0.001** −15.24, −4.16
 Exercise −0.20 3.11 −3.11 0.002** −15.81, −3.56

GIS, Gout Impact Scale; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval.

*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01.