Clinical significance of antinuclear antibody positivity in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019

Article information

Korean J Intern Med. 2023;38(3):417-426

Publication date (electronic) : 2023 April 6

doi : https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2022.352

Soo Hyun Park¹, Jin Woong Suh¹, Kyung-Sook Yang², Jeong Yeon Kim¹, Sun Bean Kim¹, Jang Wook Sohn¹, Young Kyung Yoon¹

¹Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

²Department of Biostatistics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to: Young Kyung Yoon, M.D., Ph.D., Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 73 Inchon-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea, Tel: +82-2-920-5341, Fax: +82-2-920-5616, E-mail: young7912@korea.ac.kr

Received 2022 November 11; Revised 2023 January 10; Accepted 2023 January 17.

Abstract

Graphical abstract

INTRODUCTION

The clinical course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is influenced sequentially by SARS-CoV-2 itself in the replicative stage and by an aberrant host-immune response in the adaptive autoimmunity stage [1]. SARS-CoV-2 has similarities to several viruses, such as the Epstein-Barr virus, parvovirus B19, human T-lymphotropic virus-1, and human immunodeficiency virus that cause autoimmune diseases by promoting the production of pathogenic autoantibodies, such as antinuclear antibodies (ANAs), as a result of viral cross-reactivity with autoantigens [2].

Some patients with COVID-19 develop fatal complications due to a hyperinflammatory state called cytokine storm [3]. Altered T and B cell activation is associated with ANA production, which plays an essential role in tissue damage in autoimmune diseases [4]. These immune-mediated mechanisms have drawn attention to immunomodulatory therapy for patients with severe COVID-19 to attenuate viral cross-reactions with autoantigens [5]. Particularly, the current National Institute of Health (NIH) guidelines for the treatment of COVID-19 recommend immunomodulatory therapy for patients receiving oxygen therapy through a high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), non-invasive or mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) [6]. However, the clinical usefulness of ANA as a prognostic factor for COVID-19 in critically ill patients requiring high-dose oxygen therapy has not yet been evaluated.

This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 who were fluorescent antinuclear antibody (FANA) positive and elucidate the role of FANA as a prognostic factor of mortality.

METHODS

RESULTS

Patients and clinical characteristics

During the study period, 132 patients with severe COVID-19 who required high-dose oxygen therapy were included. The detection rate of FANA in these patients was 58.3%: 1:80 (n = 46, 34.8%), 1:160 (n = 19, 14.4%), 1:320 (n = 9, 6.8%), 1:640 (n = 1, 0.8%), and 1:1,280 (n = 2, 1.5%); speck-led (n = 5, 3.8%), cytoplasmic (n = 5, 3.8%), mitotic (n = 2, 1.5%), nuclear (n = 10, 7.6%), homogeneous (n = 25, 18.9%), centromere (n = 1, 0.8%), and concurrent patterns (n = 29, 22.0%). Among the 132 patients, 12 with a FANA titer ≥ 1:320 were anti-ds-DNA negative, and complement 3 or 4 was lower than the normal range in five patients. Additionally, the extractable nuclear antigen panel performed in five patients was negative.

A comparison of the demographic and clinical characteristics, and outcomes between FANA-positive and-negative patients is summarized in Table 1. Those who were FANA-positive were older than those who were FANA-negative (Table 1). Neurologic, malignant, and pulmonary diseases were more common in FANA-positive patients than FANA-negative ones (Table 1). The C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, D-dimer, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) levels were significantly higher in FANA-positive patients than in FANA-negative ones (Table 1).

Table 1

Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics, and outcomes between the FANA-positive and -negative groups of patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection

Remdesivir, dexamethasone, and anticoagulant were administered in 84.8%, 93.9%, and 88.6% of the 132 patients, respectively. Notably, tocilizumab was prescribed in 55 patients (41.7%). There was no difference in the major treatment modalities between the FANA-positive and FANA-negative groups (Table 1). In the FANA-positive patients, there was no significant difference in mortality between patients who received remdesivir, anticoagulant, and dexamethasone and those who additionally received tocilizumab (12/25 [48.0%] vs. 13/25 [52.0%], p = 0.492).

FANA-positive patients received mechanical ventilation or ECMO treatment more frequently than FANA-negative patients. In addition, FANA-positive patients had a significantly higher 28-day mortality rate than FANA-negative patients (Table 1).

Risk factors for 28-day mortality

A comparison of the demographic and clinical characteristics between survivors and non-survivors is shown in Table 2. Univariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis using 25 variables was performed to identify the prognostic factors associated with 28-day mortality (Table 3). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, 12 variables that were statistically significant in the univariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were selected. FANA-positive findings (hazard ratio [HR], 2.645; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.038–6.739), age (per 1-year; HR, 1.052; 95% CI, 1.012–1.095), underlying pulmonary disease (HR, 3.155; 95% CI, 0.970–10.263), underlying hypertension (HR, 2.965; 95% CI, 1.280–6.867), and blood urea nitrogen > 20 mg/dL (HR, 3.716; 95% CI, 1.092–12.642) were independent predictors of 28-day mortality. However, remdesivir (HR, 0.336; 95% CI, 0.153–0.737) was found to be an independent predictor that reduced mortality (Table 4). The Harrell’s concordance index value for prognostic factors associated with 28-day mortality in patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection was 0.825 (95% CI, 0.766–0.884).

Table 2

Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics between survivors and non-survivors among patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection

Table 3

Univariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of prognostic factors associated with 28-day mortality in patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection

Table 4

Multivariate Cox regression analysis of prognostic factors associated with 28-day mortality in patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection

DISCUSSION

Our study found a FANA-positivity rate of 58.3% in patients with severe COVID-19 and discovered the usefulness of FANA as a predictor for 28-day mortality. In addition, a positive finding of FANA at the time of exacerbation tended to be significantly associated with a worse clinical course. However, no evidence was found for FANA-positive findings to be indicative of a positive therapeutic effect on immunomodulators.

Overall, our study showed a FANA positivity rate of 58.3% in patients with severe COVID-19, similar to a value of 50% reported in previous studies involving severe and critical cases of COVID-19 [9,10]. Meanwhile, the positivity rates of ANA ranged from 21.3% to 57.5% in patients with COVID-19 on various clinical spectrums [9–14]. The differences in ANA detection rates between previous studies may be affected by disease severity and timing of sampling [9–14]. However, previous studies did not determine the most appropriate FANA positivity threshold. ANA is not a dichotomous measure. The ANA titer can provide additional information for the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Additionally, higher titers of ANA and the presence of other autoantibodies may have clinical implications in patients with severe COVID-19. Therefore, it may be helpful to investigate the differences in clinical characteristics according to the FANA titer.

Our findings showed that positive FANA findings were associated with older age and a higher prevalence of comorbidities such as neurologic disease, pulmonary diseases, and malignancy [9,10]. Previous findings demonstrated that a positive finding of ANA was more prevalent in older adults [15,16]. Furthermore, in previous studies, ANA was found to be positive in up to 44.4% of patients with malignancy [17,18]. The clinical significance of ANA testing in diverse neurological or pulmonary diseases is unknown. However, a previous study reported that ANA was present in 5.5% of patients with various neurological diseases, and of these, only 28% had connective tissue diseases [19]. Notably, 70% and 32% of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or interstitial lung disease were positive for ANAs, respectively [20,21]. Evidence has indicated that comorbidities are associated with the severity of COVID-19, which in turn increases mortality and morbidity [22,23].

Consistent with previous findings, we found that inflammatory markers of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin, contributing to severe COVID-19, were significantly higher in the FANA-positive group than in the FANA-negative group [10,24]. Previously, no association between ANA and inflammatory markers or D-dimer was observed [9,11,25,26]. However, in our study involving critically ill patients, D-dimer or NT-pro BNP levels were also significantly more increased in FANA-positive patients than in FANA-negative patients.

In our study, FANA-positive patients were more likely to have severe manifestations than FANA-negative patients (Table 1). Patients who were positive for ANA tended to have a severe condition and worse prognosis [11,14]. Similarly, our study identified FANA as a predictor of 28 day-mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Thus, FANA detection might predict an adverse clinical course. However, further studies are needed to determine whether FANA significantly contributes to serious conditions or an epiphenomenon of severe inflammation.

This study also investigated the clinical usefulness of FANA positivity in screening patients with COVID-19 for whom immunomodulatory agents may be helpful. However, no clear benefit was observed with tocilizumab administration in patients with FANA-positive findings. In-depth analysis of the relationship between FANA-positive findings and immunomodulatory effects in a more subdivided group with a larger number of patients is needed. Interestingly, a previous report suggested that tocilizumab was only helpful when patients with severe COVID-19 showed C-reactive protein levels > 150 mg/L [27]. Therefore, it is necessary to identify the timing of administration at which the effect of the immunomodulatory agent is maximized.

Our study identified previously well-known predictors of 28-day mortality in patients with severe COVID-19. In order to reduce the disease burden of severe COVID-19, several organizations suggested that it is vital to control blood pressure [28]. Acute renal injury, an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality, can develop in about 30% of patients with severe COVID-19 [29,30]. From this point of view, blood urea nitrogen may be considered a risk factor for mortality in patients with COVID-19 [31].

Our study has several limitations. First, this was a single-center study involving a small population. Hence, it may have a selection bias. Therefore, multicenter studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate our findings. Second, although autoantibodies are key features of autoimmune diseases, they are not necessarily indicative of autoimmune disease. FANA can be detected transiently in acute illnesses and infections. However, no preinfection serological or long-term follow-up data were collected on the study participants. Third, our study used an ANA cut-off dilution of 1:80 as the criterion for positivity. Stratification analysis according to the FANA titer could not be performed because of the small number of study participants. Finally, laboratory findings were included as categorical variables in multivariate analysis. Therefore, our findings should be interpreted taking the cut-off values into account.

Our results suggest that severe COVID-19 is associated with a high prevalence of FANA-positive findings as an autoimmune phenomenon. This finding may support the hypothesis that optimizing immunosuppressive therapy can suppress the rapid deterioration of patients with COVID-19 resulting from immune dysfunction, such as the effects of cytokine storms. Particularly, this study suggested the potential of FANA in predicting their outcomes for COVID-19. However, in the future, additional research is needed to identify the target patients and the timing of immunomodulatory drugs by applying strategies according to the autoimmune disease characteristics of patients with COVID-19.

KEY MESSAGE

Article information Continued