Predictors of recurrent acute myocardial infarction despite successful percutaneous coronary intervention

Article information

Korean J Intern Med. 2022;37(4):777-785

Publication date (electronic) : 2022 June 28

doi : https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2021.427

Sang Hun Lee¹, Myung Ho Jeong^1,2, Joon Ho Ahn¹, Dae Young Hyun¹, Kyung Hoon Cho¹, Min Chul Kim^1,2, Doo Sun Sim^1,2, Young Joon Hong^1,2, Ju Han Kim^1,2, Youngkeun Ahn^1,2, Jin Yong Hwang³, Weon Kim⁴, Jong Seon Park⁵, Chang-Hwan Yoon⁶, Seung Ho Hur⁷, Sang Rok Lee⁸, Kwang Soo Cha⁹, on behalf of the KAMIR (Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry)-NIH Investigators

¹Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea

²Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea

³Department of Cardiology, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, Korea

⁴Department of Cardiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

⁵Department of Cardiology, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea

⁶Department of Cardiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea

⁷Department of Cardiology, Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital, Daegu, Korea

⁸Department of Cardiology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea

⁹Department of Cardiology, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea

Correspondence to: Myung Ho Jeong, M.D., Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, 42 Jebong-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju 61469, Korea, Tel: +82-62-220-6243, Fax: +82-62-228-7174, E-mail: myungho@chollian.net

Received 2021 September 13; Revised 2021 December 11; Accepted 2022 February 7.

Abstract

Graphical abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular disease is one of the major causes of death globally and in the Republic of Korea [1,2]. Therefore, many trials are being conducted with the aim of decreasing mortality and improving the outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Among the complications of AMI, recurrent AMI is a very critical condition and can be fatal. According to a previous study, the mortality risk of recurrent AMI is approximately 8% [3]. Furthermore, recurrent AMI impairs cardiac function, which leads to heart failure and its symptoms that adversely affect patients’ quality of life. Thus, identifying patients who are at risk for recurrent AMI after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is effective in implementing active surveillance and strategies to manage modifiable risk factors in these patients. These efforts are expected to improve health outcomes, decrease mortality rate, preserve patients’ cardiac function, and enhance their quality of life. However, only a few studies have focused on the risk factors for recurrent AMI. Herein, we aimed to elucidate the risk factors for recurrent AMI despite successful PCI by comparing the characteristics of patients who did and did not suffer from recurrent AMI. We investigated the independent predictors for recurrent AMI following the first AMI despite successful PCI using the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR)-National Institute of Health (NIH) data.

METHODS

Study population

We used data from the KAMIR-NIH registry [2]. The KAMIR-NIH registry was approved by the ethics committee at each participating center (Chonnam National University Hospital; CNUH-2011-172), this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chonnam National University Hospital (IRB No : CNUH-2022-058) and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Between November 2011 and October 2015, 13,103 patients were enrolled in the KAMIR-NIH (Fig. 1). We excluded 1,029 cases with a history of previous myocardial infarction (MI); thus, 12,074 patients who had experienced a first AMI were included. Among them, PCI was not performed in 1,168 cases, the PCI was suboptimal in 94 cases, or failed in 53 cases. Therefore, 10,759 patients underwent successful PCI, of whom 890 were lost to follow-up. Finally, 9,869 patients were included in this study, and AMI recurred in 359 cases.

Figure 1

Study population. The study population was derived from the nationwide prospective Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR)-National Institutes of Health (NIH). AMI, acute myocardial infarction; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical characteristics

A total of 9,869 patients were included in the study (Table 1). The number of cases in the recurrent and the non-recurrent AMI groups were 359 and 9,510, respectively. The AMI recurrence rate was 3.6% (Fig. 2). Regarding the interval of recurrence, the following frequencies of reinfarction cases occurred: 25 cases within 1 day (four deaths occurred with four cardiac deaths), 46 cases within 30 days (eight deaths occurred with eight cardiac deaths), 78 cases within 6 months (nine deaths occurred with eight cardiac deaths), 56 cases within 12 months (nine deaths occurred with six cardiac deaths), 79 cases within 24 months (seven deaths occurred with five cardiac deaths), and 75 cases within 36 months (seven deaths occurred with three cardiac deaths). More detailed information about the characteristics of recurrent AMI is presented in Supplementary Table 1. Killip class III or IV was frequent in the recurrent AMI group. The presence of conditions such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), renal dysfunction, and atypical chest pain was more frequent in the recurrent AMI group than in the non-recurrent AMI group.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics

Figure 2

Cumulative rate and number of recurrent acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Coronary angiographic and other procedural findings

In both groups, the most common target lesion was the left anterior descending artery, followed by the right coronary artery, left circumflex coronary artery, and left main coronary artery (Table 2). The proportion of PCI in all locations and the frequency of multivessel disease was higher in the recurrent AMI group than in the non-recurrent AMI group. The proportion of cases in which the total ischemic time was longer than 12 hours or ejection fraction was < 50%, and lesion type B2 or C were the same in both groups. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was comparable between the groups. The ischemic burden was estimated as the maximum troponin I level, and there was no statistically significant difference between the groups. Regarding medical treatment, there was no difference between the groups in the frequency of prescribing antiplatelet agents, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, and statins.

Table 2

Coronary angiographic, echocardiographic, laboratory findings, and medication

Independent predictive factors for recurrent AMI

The following variables with p < 0.1 in the univariable analysis were included in the multivariable logistic regression analysis after considering covariance: age ≥ 75 years, women, heart rate > 100 beats/min, Killip class III or IV, hypertension, DM, previous heart failure, smoking, renal dysfunction, atypical chest pain, PCI of the left anterior descending coronary artery, multivessel disease, and ejection fraction < 50% (Supplementary Table 2). Of these, the significant predictive factors were DM, renal dysfunction, atypical chest pain, and multivessel disease (Table 3).

Table 3

Multivariable analysis for predictors of recurrent acute myocardial infarction

To evaluate the effect of recurrent AMI, we compared MACE incidence after 1 year between patients with and without AMI recurrence using the Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. The cumulative incidence rate of MACE in the AMI recurrence group was significantly higher compared with that in the non-recurrence group (log-rank p < 0.001) (Fig. 3). Additionally, we investigated the predictors of recurrent AMI within 1 year (Supplementary Tables 3 and 4). In the multivariable analysis, the predictors of recurrent AMI within 1 year were Killip class III or IV, hypertension, DM, atypical chest pain, multivessel disease, and statin use.

Figure 3

Cumulative rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after 1 year from first event in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) recurred group within the 1 year vs. non-recurred group. Red line: AMI recurred group within the 1 year, Blue line: AMI non-recurred group with in the 1 year.

DISCUSSION

This study identified several independent predictive factors for recurrent AMI after successful PCI, including DM, renal dysfunction, atypical chest pain, and multivessel disease. Given that these patients have a higher ischemic risk, clinicians should consider prescribing the dual antiplatelet therapy for a longer duration and administer more potent P2Y12 inhibitors (antiplatelet drugs) in this patient population.

DM is a well-known risk factor for the development of vascular diseases. Previous studies showed that coronary events such as restenosis and stent thrombosis were more common among patients with DM because of the modification of the response to arterial injury [13]. Therefore, adequate diabetic control is essential to prevent AMI recurrence.

According to a previous study, patients with renal dysfunction comprise a very high-risk group for coronary artery disease. In particular, the cardiovascular mortality rate of patients with end-stage renal disease treated using hemodialysis was 10 to 20 times higher than that of the general population [14]. Regarding AMI recurrence, these patients have a higher risk and need more active surveillance and cautious management.

Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed atypical chest pain as a risk factor for AMI recurrence. Baseline characteristics of the atypical and typical chest pain groups were different. Patients presenting with atypical chest pain were older, more often women, and had longer total ischemic time; were more likely to have Killip class III or IV at admission, low systolic blood pressure, high heart rate, and renal dysfunction; were more likely to have hypertension, DM, previous cerebrovascular accident, previous heart failure, atrial fibrillation compared with those presenting with typical chest pain (Supplementary Table 5). The pathophysiology of these differences were appeared is not clear, yet. Further studies should be conducted to explore the relationship between the degree of pain and associated symptoms (e.g., dyspnea and diaphoresis), patient perception of the significance of the disease, education level, medical adherence, and to explain the pathophysiology on the risk of AMI recurrence.

Multivessel disease has been revealed a risk factor for AMI recurrence. A previous study showed that the number of stents, stenosis length, and reference diameter were associated with the risk of restenosis [15]. However, several questions need to be addressed to understand the association of multivessel disease with AMI recurrence better. First, has AMI recurred in the same vessel/vessels? Second, has AMI recurred as in-stent restenosis or in a nearby stent? Third, was there any pre-existing evidence of insignificant stenosis in the vessel at the time of the first AMI [16–18]? Finally, the length and diameter of the vessel should be considered as potential contributing factors [19,20].

A previous study evaluated the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association lesion classification as a predictor of procedural, 30-day, and 12-month outcomes. In that study, complex lesion (type B2 and C) was associated with lower 30-day and 12-month survival rates, and the authors attributed this to the lower procedural success rate [21]. In the present study, we only enrolled patients who had successful PCI; hence, there was no association between complex lesion types and AMI recurrence.

In the multivariable analysis, the predictors of recurrent AMI within 1 and 3 years were different. The reason for the difference is not clear. Killip class III or IV, hypertension, and the use of statin were the only predictors of recurrent AMI within 1 year, and these factors can be controlled with medical treatment; however, apart from the prescription of medication, additional investigations regarding the adequacy of medical treatment and achievement of the target value should be followed-up. Furthermore, a previous study emphasized the importance of using statin to control dyslipidemia in acute coronary syndrome patients [22]. Within 1 year, which is relatively early, and after that, the stability of the plaque, medications and difference in ejection fraction between the first AMI, recurrence, and follow-up may help explain the difference of predictors. Because the high-risk patient group died within 1 year, it is thought that there might be differences in the patient characteristics starting from 1 year.

Recurrent AMI is an important risk factor for critical events such as MACE, and efforts should be taken to prevent AMI recurrence by identifying high-risk groups and their clinical characteristics; in particular, identifying modifiable risk factors is important. This will allow clinicians to implement active surveillance strategies and ultimately improve patients’ cardiac function and overall quality of life.

There are several limitations to the present study. First, because the hospitals participating in the KAMIR-NIH are the best university hospitals in Korea, patients’ clinical conditions tend to be more severe, and the quality of medical services provided is superior to those of average hospitals. Therefore, the treatment and outcomes cannot be generalized to patients treated at average hospitals. Second, multiple previous studies have demonstrated that the degree of lipid control, not only LDL-C but also non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, is an independent risk factor for recurrent AMI [23–25]. However, lipid profile data at the 3-year follow-up was only available for a minority of the study population (25%, 2,454 patients), which may have influenced our results. Third, we did not consider other potential factors which may influence AMI recurrence, such as the precise location of recurrent AMI compared with the first AMI location; the type of stent; number of stents; length of the stent; degree of control of other underlying diseases such as hypertension and DM; and other thrombogenic conditions such as performance status, infection, and autoimmune diseases. Finally, although we analyzed the predictive ability of several variables, we were unable to assess patient compliance accurately. This is important because another study demonstrated that good patient compliance could reduce cardiovascular event risk after AMI [26]; therefore, this aspect may have affected our results.

KEY MESSAGE

Supplementary Information

Article information Continued