Analysis of thromboembolic events in head and neck cancer patients who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin

Article information

Korean J Intern Med. 2022;37(3):653-659

Publication date (electronic) : 2022 April 20

doi : https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2021.309

Hundo Cho¹, Jin-Hyuk Choi¹, Seok Yun Kang¹, Hyun Woo Lee¹, Yong Won Choi¹, Tae-Hwan Kim¹, Mi Sun Ahn¹, Chul-Ho Kim², Yoo Seob Shin², Jeon Yeob Jang², Young-Taek Oh³, Jaesung Heo³, Seung Soo Sheen⁴

¹Department of Hematology-Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea

²Department of Otolaryngology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea

³Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea

⁴Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea

Correspondence to: Mi Sun Ahn, M.D., Department of Hematology-Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, 164 World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 16499, Korea, Tel: +82-31-219-7102, Fax: +82-31-219-5983, E-mail: maruhiran@hanmail.net

Received 2021 July 5; Revised 2021 October 25; Accepted 2021 December 24.

Abstract

Graphical abstract

INTRODUCTION

While malignant tumor cells induce hypercoagulation through several mechanisms, the administration of chemotherapeutic agents may be associated with thrombotic events [1,2]. As a result, the risk of thromboembolic events (TEE) in cancer patients is about four times higher than in the general population, and that risk increases up to 6.5 times for patients receiving chemotherapy [3,4]. In particular, TEE incidence in various cancer types of patients treated with chemotherapy including cisplatin, one of the most frequently used agents, was reported to be higher compared to those with other regimens [5–9]. Moreover, TEE occurrence may affect cancer patients outcomes [10,11].

Head and neck (H&N) cancer refers to malignancy, usually squamous cell carcinoma, in areas such as the nasopharynx, nasal cavity, oropharynx, oral cavity, hypopharynx, and larynx, and incidence is relatively high in many countries [12,13]. In locally advanced H&N cancer, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with cisplatin is the established standard therapy for definitive treatment and adjuvant therapy [14–17]. Nonetheless, there are small number of reports regarding the incidence of TEE in H&N cancer with conflicting results, without any real-world study which investigated TEE in patients receiving CCRT with cisplatin [18–20].

For that reason, we investigated the incidence of TEE in H&N cancer patients who received CCRT with cisplatin, and analyzed the factors affecting TEE occurrence.

METHODS

RESULTS

Of the 265 H&N cancer patients who underwent CCRT with cisplatin during the study period, 257 patients were included in the analysis while eight patients were excluded for the following reasons: previous history of chemotherapy including platinum (four patients); history of TEE within 3 months before the start of treatment (two patients); salivary gland adenocarcinoma (one patient); and induction chemotherapy before CCRT (one patient).

Table 1 summarizes the clinical characteristics of all patients and those with occurrence of TEE. Of the 257 eligible patients, 224 (87.2%) were under the age of 70 years, with a median age of 59 (range, 18 to 78), and 219 (85.2%) were male. The most prevalent cancer site was the nasopharynx (72 patients/28.6%), and the most common stage was IV (124 patients/48.2%). Forty-one patients were followed for less than 6 months after completion of CCRT for the following reasons: death (19 patients); transfer to other hospitals (13 patients); and lost to follow-up (nine patients).

Table 1

Patients characteristics and their relationship with thromboembolic events

TEE occurred in five patients (1.9%), with no significant association between the incidence of TEE and clinical characteristics. Among patients with TEE occurrence, Khorana score were 0 (two patients), 1 (one patient), and 2 (two patients), with a significant correlation between TEE and Khorana score (p = 0.010) (Table 1). Cumulative incidence rates of TEE were 0.8% at the 2nd month, 1.6% at the 4th month, and 1.9% at the 6th month, respectively (Fig. 1). Types of TEE included DVT alone (three patients/60%), simultaneous occurrence of DVT and PE (one patient/20%), and arterial thrombosis (common carotid artery) (one patient/20%). No TEE event was diagnosed after progression or recurrence of disease.

Figure 1

Cumulative incidence of thromboembolic events (TEE).

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, the present study is the first to investigate the incidence of TEE in H&N cancer patients who underwent CCRT with cisplatin in real-world practice. The observed incidence of TEE was 1.9%, and Khorana score was the only factor associated with the risk of TEE.

In cancer patients, various risk factors increase the incidence of TEE. Among patient-related factors, TEE is known to be associated with age, obesity, thrombocytosis, leukocytosis, hemoglobin < 10 g/dL before chemotherapy, and a history of previous TEE [22,24]. Treatment-related factors such as chemotherapy are also associated with risk of TEE [2].

Conflicting results have been reported regarding the incidence of TEE in H&N cancer patients. According to one meta-analysis, the incidence of VTE in H&N cancer patients was 0.16% to 3.13% [18]. Incidence of VTE in H&N cancer patients after surgery is generally low (0% to 8%), although one study reported higher rate of 26.3% [18,20]. While one study reported that H&N cancer is the least common type of cancer diagnosed following VTE, another large study identified H&N cancer as the second highest risk for VTE among 18 types of carcinoma [18,19]. In a large population-based study, the incidence of TEE in non-cancer population was 1.4%, which is similar to the rate of occurrence among H&N cancer patients reported in several studies [18,25].

In the present study, the observed incidence rate of TEE was 1.9%, which is not that dissimilar to the rate in the general population and aligns with previous studies regarding the incidence of TEE in H&N cancer [18]. However, most previous studies of TEE in H&N cancer analyzed heterogenous populations consisting mainly of a surgical treatment alone group, with small number of reports about patients who received chemotherapy including various regimens [18,20]. The present study investigated patients who underwent CCRT with cisplatin, which is the essential chemotherapeutic agent for management of H&N cancer. Although the mechanism of cisplatin-induced hypercoagulability is not entirely clear, several studies have proposed possible pathophysiologic processes; these include impaired autoregulation of the vascular system, an altered balance between thrombosis and fibrinolysis, direct endovascular damage, increased procoagulant activity of red blood cells, and modulation of tissue factor on human monocytes [26–28].

There have been several reports of increased TEE incidence in patients treated with cisplatin-based regimens. Among these, Moore et al. [8] reported an 18.1% incidence of TEE related to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in 932 patients with various types of malignancy. The reported incidence of TEE in non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent a cisplatin-based regimen was 8.0% to 17.6%, with 10.2% of the 1-year incidence rate of TEE in small cell lung cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy [5–7,29]. In the present study, the incidence of TEE in H&N cancer patients during or after CCRT with cisplatin seems to be low when compared to patients with other types of cancer who received cisplatin-based regimens. A larger-scale study is required to determine the possible explanation for these findings.

In the present study, one interesting result is the significant association between the TEE occurrence and Khorana score despite of the low incidence of TEE itself. As a means of predicting the risk of chemotherapy-associated thrombosis in cancer patients, the Khorana scoring system has some limitations. For example, since BMI > 35 kg/m² is rare among Asian patients, accurate evaluation is difficult [5,30]. In the present study cohort, only one patient (0.4%) had a BMI of > 35 kg/m², which figure was not significantly different from that of the previous Asian study [5,30]. Nonetheless, Khorana score was the only factor associated with the TEE incidence in present study. Therefore, in cases of H&N cancer patients with high Khorana score receiving cisplatin-CCRT, treating physician should be aware of possible TEE occurrence during or for a period of time after CCRT. In addition, these patients should be informed about the somewhat higher risk of TEE before starting treatment.

The present study has several limitations. First, as a retrospective study based on a review of medical records, selection bias may occur, resulting in possible underestimation of TEE incidence. Second, the small number of patients with TEE means that statistically significant results are less reliable, especially in terms of the relationship between TEE incidence and clinical characteristics. Third, we did not compare TEE incidence in patients who underwent CCRT as adjuvant therapy, (i.e., almost 50% of the total patients,) with incidence in those who received adjuvant radiotherapy alone flowing surgical resection. Finally, the present study cohort comprised patients from a single institution over a fairly long period. Nevertheless, this study seems to be clinically meaningful because it investigated all patients during the defined period who underwent CCRT with cisplatin, which is the mainstay of treatment for locally advanced H&N cancer, reflecting real-world clinical practice in Korea.

KEY MESSAGE

Article information Continued