The relationship between miRNA-26b and connective tissue growth factor in rat models of aortic banding and debanding

Article information

Korean J Intern Med. 2021;36(3):596-607
Publication date (electronic) : 2019 December 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2019.120
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Korea
2Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Korea
3Clinical Research Institute, College of Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Korea
4Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to Eun Joo Cho, M.D. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 10 63-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 07345, Korea Tel: +82-2-3779-1335 Fax: +82-2-780-9114 E-mail: choej4oct@gmail.com
Received 2019 April 5; Revised 2019 July 12; Accepted 2019 July 23.

Abstract

Background/Aims

Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) is a profibrotic factor implicated in pressure overload-mediated myocardial fibrosis. In this study, we determined the role of predicted CTGF-targeting microRNAs (miRNAs) in rat models of aortic stenosis and reverse cardiac remodeling.

Methods

Minimally invasive ascending aortic banding was performed in 24 7-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats, which were divided into three groups. The banding group consisted of eight rats that were sacrificed immediately after 6 weeks of aortic constriction. The debanding group underwent aortic constriction for 4 weeks and was sacrificed 2 weeks after band removal. The third group underwent sham surgery. We investigated the expression of CTGF, transforming growth factor-β1 (TGFβ1), and matrix metalloproteinase-2 using ELISA and examined miRNA-26b, miRNA-133a, and miRNA-19b as predicted CTGF-targeting miRNAs based on miRNA databases in 24-hour TGFβ-stimulated and TGFβ- washed fibroblasts and myocardial tissues from all subjects.

Results

CTGF was elevated in 24-hour TGFβ-stimulated fibroblasts and decreased in 24-hour TGFβ-washed fibroblasts. miRNA-26b was significantly increased in TGFβ-washed fibroblasts compared with control and TGFβ-stimulated fibroblasts (p < 0.05). CTGF expression was significantly higher in the banding group than that in the sham and debanding groups. The relative expression levels of miRNA-26b were higher in the debanding group than in the banding group.

Conclusions

The results of our study using models of aortic banding and debanding suggested that miRNA-26b was significantly increased after aortic debanding. The in vitro model yielded the same results: miRNA-26b was upregulated after removal of TGFβ from fibroblasts.

INTRODUCTION

Aortic stenosis (AS) can increase cardiac pressure overload and cause left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), which is the main compensatory mechanism in the early phase of the disease. Long-term left ventricle (LV) pressure overload provokes a decrease in myocardial perfusion pressure, eventually leading to subendocardial ischemia and consequent myocardial apoptosis and reactive perivascular and interstitial fibrosis in the extracellular matrix (ECM). Experimental banding of the ascending aorta in rodents is the most commonly used small animal model of AS [1]. Furthermore, the ascending aortic banding and subsequent debanding model can be used to examine reverse cardiac remodeling, such as aortic valve replacement [2-4].

Interstitial and perivascular fibrosis in the pressure overload model arise from T cells and macrophages that have invaded the adventitia of intramural coronary arterioles [5-7]. Once activated, normal fibroblasts differentiate into myofibroblasts, resulting in transforming growth factor-beta (TGFβ) expression stimulated by angiotensin II. TGFβ1, which is subsequently generated by myofibroblasts, induces the transcription of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF, CCN2). CTGF, a matricellular protein of the CCN family of proteins, is a key profibrotic factor that promotes the formation and activation of myofibroblasts and stimulates ECM deposition and tissue remodeling [8-10]. Furthermore, several studies have reported that inhibition of CTGF can reverse the process of fibrosis [9,11]. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are single-stranded, highly conserved, small noncoding RNAs that bind to the 3′-UTR of mRNA and regulate gene expression through translational repression and mRNA degradation.

In this study, we evaluated the expression of CTGF, TGFβ1, and matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and we assessed miRNA-26b, miRNA-133a, and miRNA-19b in in vivo and in vitro models of reverse cardiac remodeling.

METHODS

Cell culture

Rat fibroblast Rat2 cells were purchased from American Type Tissue Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). Cells were maintained in RPMI supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, HyClone, Logan, UT, USA), 50 U/mL penicillin, and 50 µg/mL streptomycin in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37℃.

Western blot analysis of Rat2 cells

Rat2 cells were plated at a density of 105 cells/mL in complete medium. After 24 hours, the cells were serum-starved with 0.5% FBS for 12 hours and treated with TGFβ (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) for 24 hours before the TGFβ was washed out with complete medium for 24 hours (Fig. 1). The cells were homogenized in lysis buffer and separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Then, the proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and the signals were detected using antibodies for collagen I, α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA, Abcam) and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, Cell Signaling Biotechnology, Danvers, MA, USA).

Figure 1.

Fibrosis in Rat2 cells was identified on the basis of the expression of collagen I and α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA). Upon transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) treatment, Collagen I increased from 18 to 24 hours, decreased by 30 hours and then increased again by 42 hours (A). After TGFβ treatment, αSMA continuously increased from 18 to 30 hours and then decreased until 42 hours. In addition, collagen I and αSMA decreased when TGFβ was removed (B). To verify the association between TGFβ-associated fibrosis and the expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), CTGF expression in Rat2 cells was examined by real-time polymerase chain reaction. The expression of CTGF was significantly increased after 24 hours of TGFβ stimulation and decreased from 6 to 24 hours after 24 hours of TGFβ washing (p < 0.05) (C) . All experiments were repeated three times for each group. The bars and error bars indicate the mean ± SD. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Transfection

Transfection with miRNA-26b mimics was performed in Rat2 cells using Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for 48 hours. The cells were then treated with TGFβ for 24 hours.

Animal study protocol

Seven-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized with ketamine (80 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) and xylazine (8 mg/kg, intraperitoneally). Next, orotracheal intubation was performed with a 20-gauge intravenous catheter. Mechanical ventilation was maintained with a Mini-Vent ventilator (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA, USA) containing 2% isoflurane and 98% O2 at a tidal volume of 350 µL and a respiratory frequency of 160/min. The banding operation on the ascending aorta was performed with upper hemi-sternotomy and careful separation of the thymus. The ascending aorta was then freely dissected. Banding was performed with a Teflon (DuPont Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE, USA) felt-supported 5–0 silk ligation around the ascending aorta with an 18-G blunted needle to prevent aortic rupture. The sternum was fixed, and the muscle layers and skin were closed with three layers of 4–0 silk sutures. The sham operation was performed using the same hemi-thoracotomy procedure without ligation. Ketoprofen (5 mg/kg, intramuscular, once daily) and gentamycin (5 mg/kg, intramuscular, once daily) were administered postoperatively over a 3-day period.

Rats in the banding group were euthanized 6 weeks after banding. Rats in the debanding group underwent a debanding operation 28 days after the banding operation and were sacrificed 14 days after the debanding procedure. The debanding procedure was performed via right-sided, muscle-saving thoracotomy in the second intercostal space, with the banded silk on the Teflon felt being cut to avoid aortic rupture. The thymus was repositioned, and the chest was closed in three layers. The animals in the sham group underwent a similar thoracotomy procedure and were sacrificed postoperatively at 6 weeks. Each group included eight rats, and the hearts of all subjects were extracted at 13 weeks.

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Daejeon St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, and by the Republic of Korea (DMDDJ-AP-2015-09).

Histopathological analyses

After euthanasia, the rat hearts were removed, fixed in 4% formaldehyde, and then embedded in paraffin. Three mid-ventricular sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin for histological analyses, with periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) stain for cardiomyocyte size determination, and with Masson’s trichrome for fibrosis measurement (Fig. 2). The histopathological evaluation of each slide was performed by a blinded pathologist. The degree of fibrosis was quantified using ImageJ software version 1.44 (U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) by determining the blue-stained area on the Masson’s trichrome-stained slides. Additionally, the cross-sectional areas of at least 10 myocytes were measured from 200-fold-enlarged images of the PAS-stained slides using the same software. Nucleus-centered myocytes in the endocardial layer were assessed.

Figure 2.

Gross findings using Masson’s trichrome staining. Left ventricles detached from a sham rat (A, D), a rat that underwent the 6-week aortic banding procedure (B, E) and a rat that underwent the aortic debanding procedure (C, F) revealed concentric hypertrophied myocardium and increased global longitudinal strain (GLS). Concentric remodeling was relieved by the debanding operation (relative wall thickness [RWT] = 0.5), but microscopically reactive myocardial fibrosis was not significantly regressed (C, F). Compared with the GLS in the banding group, the GLS in the debanding group was not significantly improved.

Echocardiography

Echocardiographic examinations were performed twice on all subjects, at baseline and 6 weeks after banding (except for the debanding group). In the debanding group, additional echocardiographic examinations were performed 4 weeks after banding and 2 weeks after the debanding procedure. Animals were anesthetized with ketamine (80 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) and xylazine (8 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) during the echocardiographic procedures. To achieve a physiologically relevant depth of sedation during echocardiography, the heart rate was maintained at approximately 270 to 320 beats per minute. Conventional echocardiography and tissue Doppler image acquisition were performed using a 13 MHz linear array transducer (GE i13 L, Vivid E9, General Electric, Waukesha, WI, USA). Images were acquired at 35 to 45 frames/beat (110 to 190 frames/sec) using the shallowest possible depth and the smallest possible sector size [12]. Effective banding procedures were confirmed by an echocardiographic finding of maximal peak velocity at the ligation site (i.e., greater than 3 m/sec). Relieved constriction of the ascending aorta after the debanding procedure was also documented through Doppler findings. Echocardiographic imaging findings, including M-mode images and global longitudinal strain (GLS) measurements from the parasternal long-axis view, were used to measure cardiac remodeling and systolic and diastolic left ventricular function (Supplementary Material) [13-16]. A single investigator who was blinded to the animal groups performed all image acquisitions and offline measurements.

ELISA

LV myocardium samples were stored in RNAlater solution (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). Frozen tissues were homogenized, followed by centrifugation for 10 minutes at 12,000 rpm at 4℃. CTGF, TGFβ1, and MMP2 levels in LV myocardial tissues were quantified via ELISA according to the manufacturer’s instructions: CTGF (Aviva Systems Biology, San Diego, CA, USA), MMP2 (Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan), and TGFβ1 (Abnova). The optical density of the samples was determined at 450 nm in an automated microplate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).

Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction

To analyze the expression of CTGF in Rat2 cells, total RNA was isolated using the easy-BLUE Total RNA Extraction Kit (iNtRON, Seongnam, Korea). The cDNA was synthesized using the Reverse Transcriptase Premix (Elpis Biotech., Daejeon, Korea) and was amplified in a Power SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK) with CTGF-specific primer pairs (F: 5’-AAGACACATTTGGCCCTGAC-3’, R: 5’-GAGTGTCTGGGGGCAGAGTA-3’) and GAPDH-specific primer pairs (F: 5’-CCCCTTCATTGACCTCAACTACA-3’, R: 5’-TCCCATTCTCAGCCTTGACTGT-3’) as the endogenous control. miRNAs were extracted from the myocardial tissues and Rat2 cells using the miRCURY RNA Isolation Kit (Exiqon, Woburn, MA, USA). Reverse transcription was performed with the miScript II RT Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). A miRNA-specific miScript Primer Assay was purchased from QIAGEN, and real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed on a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The fold change for each miRNA was calculated using the comparative Ct (2−ΔΔCt) method, and RNU48 (a small nuclear RNA) served as an endogenous control. All reactions were performed in triplicate for each sample.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using commercially available software SPSS version 20 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). Differences between groups were assessed using 2-tailed Student’s t tests. Differences among three groups were assessed using one-way analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey tests. The data are presented as the mean value ± standard deviation. A p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS

Screening for miRNAs regulating CTGF

Online miRNA databases such as www.targetscan.org were used to predict several miRNAs that regulate the expression of CTGF. Using the miRNA databases, we found several conserved miRNAs and compared their expression to that of CTGF; ultimately, we chose miRNA-26b, miRNA-133a, and miRNA-19b with a probability of preferentially conserved targeting greater than 0.69 [17].

Assessment of left ventricular structural changes in rats following ascending aortic banding and debanding by echocardiography

Based on echocardiography, concentric LVH resulted from the ascending aortic banding operation and was relieved after the debanding operation (relative wall thickness [RWT]: 0.41 ± 0.01 vs. 0.81 ± 0.13 vs. 0.64 ± 0.09 in the sham vs. banding vs. debanding group, respectively, p < 0.001) (Table 1, Fig. 2). Heart weight/tibia length did not differ significantly between the debanding and sham groups, indicating that the debanding operation resulted in LVH regression. Compared with the LV mass of the banding group, the LV mass, which was calculated using the cubed formula based on echocardiography, of the debanding group was not significantly decreased, as the LV chamber tended to be larger because of relieved concentric LVH after the debanding procedure (Table 1).

Echocardiographic and histological measurements

Reactive myocardial fibrosis was significantly increased in the banding group but was not significantly relieved by the debanding operation until 2 weeks after the operation (Table 2). Compared with the other groups, the banding group exhibited hyperdynamic LV systolic function. Additionally, E/E’ was significantly increased in the banding group (Table 1).

Speckle tracking echocardiography and histological measurements

The three-layered global circumferential strain and radial strain did not differ significantly among the groups. However, compared with the GLS in the sham group, the GLS in the banding and debanding groups was significantly increased (Table 2). In addition, compared with that in the banding group, the GLS in the debanding group was not significantly improved (GLS: –18.7 ± 1.0 vs. –15.2 ± 2.3 vs. –15.5 ± 2.7 for the sham vs. banding vs. debanding group, p = 0.008), possibly because myocardial fibrosis was not significantly improved in the debanding group (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) was significantly higher in the banding group than that in the sham and debanding groups (A). Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2) and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGFβ1) tended to increase in the banding group and were significantly decreased in the debanding group (B, C). The bars and error bars indicate the mean ± SD.

CTGF and CTGF-targeting miRNAs in the banding and debanding models

To confirm the results from the in vivo test, CTGF, miRNA-26b, miRNA-133a, and miRNA-19b were assessed in both the banding model (a pressure remodeling model) and the debanding model (a reverse remodeling model).

CTGF levels were significantly higher in the banding group than in the sham and debanding groups (75.8 ± 7.6 pg/mg vs. 98.2 ± 19.4 pg/mg vs. 64.5 ± 14.1 pg/mg in the sham vs. banding vs. debanding group, respectively, p = 0.002). MMP2 and TGFβ1 levels tended to increase in the banding group and were significantly decreased in the debanding group (MMP2: 426.0 ± 11.8 pg/mg vs. 573.3 ± 122.2 pg/mg vs. 259.6 ± 67.1 pg/mg in the sham vs. banding vs. debanding group, respectively, p < 0.001; TGFβ1: 64.7 ± 9.5 pg/mg vs. 89.8 ± 42.2 pg/mg vs. 47.0 ± 13.2 pg/mL, respectively, p = 0.002) (Fig. 3).

We analyzed the levels of miRNA-26b, miRNA-133a, and miRNA-19b using RT-PCR. The relative expression level of miRNA-26b was higher in the debanding group than that in the banding group (miRNA-26b: 1.0 ± 0.6 vs. 0.6 ± 0.2 vs. 6.0 ± 3.01 in the sham vs. banding vs. debanding group, respectively, p < 0.001) (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

To analyze the fibrosis-related microRNAs (miRNAs) associated with the expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed using miRNA-specific primers. miRNA-26b, miRNA-133a, and miRNA-19b were evaluated in vivo and in vitro in the control group, the transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ)-stimulated group (the remodeling group), and the 24-hour TGFβ-washed group (the reverse remodeling group). Among these miRNAs, miRNA-26b was significantly elevated in the TGFβ-washed group (p < 0.05). miRNA-19b was significantly decreased in the TGFβ-stimulated group and the 24-hours TGFβ-washed group compared with the control group (p < 0.05). All experiments were repeated three times for each group (A-C). In vivo, the relative expression level of miRNA-26b was significantly higher in the debanding group than in the banding group (D). However, the relative expression level of miRNA-133a and miRNA-19b did not significantly change in our study (E,F). The bars and error bars indicate the mean ± SD.

CTGF was increased in TGFβ-stimulated fibroblasts and decreased in TGFβ-washed fibroblasts

We observed elevation of CTGF after 24 hours of treatment with TGFβ in Rat2 fibroblasts. CTGF levels were observed after 3, 6, 12 and 24 hours of TGFβ washing. After 24 hours of TGFβ washing, CTGF was significantly decreased.

Markers of fibrosis, specifically collagen I, αSMA and GAPDH, were significantly increased after 18 hours of treatment with TGFβ and decreased after 24 hours of TGFβ washing (Fig. 1).

miRNA-26b downregulated CTGF in the reverse remodeling model

Based on the results, we divided the cells into three groups: the control group, the remodeling group with elevated CTGF levels following 24 hours of TGFβ treatment, and the reverse remodeling group with decreased CTGF levels following 24 hours of TGFβ washing. miRNA-26b was significantly increased in the TGFβ-washed group compared with the control and TGFβ-stimulated groups. However, miRNA-19b was significantly decreased in the TGFβ-stimulated group and TGFβ-washed group compared with the control group (Fig. 1).

Transfection of fibroblasts with miRNA-26b mimic decreased the relative expression of CTGF. Stimulation of fibroblasts with TGFβ1 increased the relative expression of CTGF and decreased that of miRNA-26b. TGFβ1 washing decreased CTGF expression and increased miRNA-26b expression (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

(A) Transfected of fibroblasts with microRNA (miRNA)-26b mimic decreased the relative expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF). (B) Stimulation of fibroblasts with transforming growth factor-β1 (TGFβ1) increased the relative expression of CTGF and decreased that of miRNA-26b. After TGFβ1 washing, CTGF expression was decreased, and miRNA-26b expression was increased.

DISCUSSION

This study examined the relationship between CTGF-targeting miRNAs and pressure overload-mediated cardiac fibrosis. Studies using models of aortic banding and debanding demonstrated that miRNA-26b was significantly increased after aortic debanding. The in vitro model yielded the same result: miRNA-26b was upregulated after removal of TGFβ from the fibroblasts. Furthermore, fibroblasts transfected with miRNA-26b mimic had decreased relative expression of CTGF. These results suggest that miRNA-26b plays a role in CTGF suppression in the reverse cardiac remodeling model.

Concentric remodeling in the ascending aorta banding model was reversed by the debanding operation. Although the debanding model did not show statistically significant regression of myocardial fibrosis, the level of CTGF in myocardial tissue was significantly increased in the ascending aortic banding model and decreased in the subsequent debanding model. CTGF is a central mediator of tissue remodeling and fibrosis upon interaction with a variety of molecules, including cytokines and growth factors such as TGFβ, VEGF, and IGF1, as well as matrix proteins [8-10]. CTGF is required for the TGFβ-induced proliferation of myofibroblasts. Several studies have indicated that TGFβ-induced collagen production is attenuated by a CTGF antibody or an antigen oligonucleotide targeting CTGF [11,18]. Therefore, it is important to identify miRNAs that repress CTGF gene expression [19-22].

In the present study, compared with that in the sham group, the CTGF level in myocardial tissue in the banding model group was significantly increased; in contrast, the debanding model group had significantly decreased levels of CTGF in myocardial tissue than the banding model group (Fig. 3). We created an in vitro model with the same conditions as the in vivo model and evaluated CTGF over time upon TGF stimulation, as shown in Fig. 1. After 24 hours of TGF stimulation, CTGF was significantly increased; collagen I and αSMA, markers of fibrosis, were also increased. Because the fibroblasts exhibited decreased CTGF, collagen I, and αSMA after 24 hours of TGFβ washing, we speculate that the TGFβ stimulation model and the TGFβ washing model are suitable in vitro models of banding and debanding, respectively.

The relative expression of miRNA-26b was significantly upregulated in the debanding group and not in the banding group. In previous studies, functional annotation analyses of predicted target genes of miRNA-26b have revealed enrichment for genes in FGF, TGFβ, p53, and apoptosis signaling pathways, which are related to cell growth and survival functions [23]. In particular, miRNA-26b is encoded by the introns of its host gene, carboxy-terminal domain RNA polymerase II polypeptide A small phosphatase 2 (CTDSP2), and reduces the mRNA levels of this host gene [24]. CTDSPs act as phosphatases and dephosphorylate the linker regions of regulatory SMADs, activating TGFβ/SMAD signaling [25,26]. Furthermore, in vivo, we showed that miRNA-26b was upregulated in the TGFβ-washed group, which had lower levels of CTGF than the TGFβ-stimulated group. In addition, transfection of fibroblasts with miRNA-26b mimic suppressed CTGF (Fig. 5).

Previous studies have shown that miRNA-19b is inversely correlated with collagen fibril cross-linking protein and with the enzyme lysyl oxidase (LOX), which regulates collagen fibril cross-linking protein. miRNA-19b has also previously been shown to decrease in fibroblasts after TGFβ stimulation in vitro [27]. Notably, patients with heart failure due to AS have lower levels of miRNA-19b than patients without heart failure due to AS. Furthermore, miRNA-19b is known to be associated with aortic aneurysm [27]. However, our in vivo studies did not yield the same results as the in vitro studies, and the standard deviation of the banding group was high. This discrepancy might be attributable to differences between the previous model and our banding model, which had a relatively short pressure overload duration and was not combined with heart failure due to pressure overload. In addition, the fibrosis in our model was not severe, and our model involved two aortic surgeries, which could have affected miRNA-19b levels.

In the present study, the banding operation provoked concentric LVH: compared with the RWT in the sham group, the RWT in the banding group was increased. The debanding operation reversed the concentric remodeling RWT observed in the debanding group: compared with the RWT in the banding group, the RWT in the debanding group was reduced but was still greater than that in the sham group (Table 1 and Fig. 2). In previous studies using the banding model, reactive interstitial fibrosis has been shown to worsen progressively from the endocardium to the epicardium over 6 to 12 months, depending on the banding duration [14]. GLS, a parameter of deformation, was significantly increased in the banding model. However, GLS did not show improvement in the debanding model (Table 2), possibly because myocardial fibrosis was not significantly relieved after the debanding operation, even though it relieved concentric remodeling.

There are several limitations of this study. The acute severe LV pressure overload model in the ascending aorta and the subsequent debanding procedure result in a high mortality rate (greater than 15%) because of aortic rupture during the dissection of periaortic adhesions [3,4]. In the present study, Teflon felt-supported banding of the ascending aorta reduced mortality to less than 5% by preventing aortal injury during the cutting of the banded silk. Site velocity (for banding and debanding) was not estimated through invasive carotid catheterization; instead, echocardiography was used to determine whether the banding and debanding models were appropriate. In our study, fibrosis was not significantly reversible after debanding because no medication was administered [4]. Furthermore, echocardiography was performed in rats sedated with ketamine injections, which could decrease heart performance. Additionally, all groups were treated using identical methods. The frame rate relative to the heart cycle duration was lower than that in previous animal studies, where higher frame rates occurred due to the use of different instrumentation and algorithms [16].

In conclusion, the ascending aortic banding and subsequent debanding models can very feasibly be used to obtain evidence for studies on cardiac hypertrophy or recovery that involve molecular and cellular biology, pathology, and echocardiographic imaging techniques. Additionally, miRNA-26b may play an important role in CTGF suppression in the reversal of cardiac remodeling from pressure overload. Therefore, miRNA-26b may be a therapeutic target for pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis.

KEY MESSAGE

1. Banding and debanding of the ascending aorta in a rat model are feasible methods for simulation of severe pressure overload with cardiac remodeling and recovery.

2. MicroRNA-26b may play an important role in connective tissue growth factor suppression in the reverse remodeling of pressure overload-mediated myocardial fibrosis.

Notes

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from the Korean Society of Cardiology.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

References

1. Houser SR, Margulies KB, Murphy AM, et al. Animal models of heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Res 2012;111:131–150.
2. Bjornstad JL, Skrbic B, Sjaastad I, Bjornstad S, Christensen G, Tonnessen T. A mouse model of reverse cardiac remodelling following banding-debanding of the ascending aorta. Acta Physiol (Oxf ) 2012;205:92–102.
3. Cho JS, Cho EJ, Lee J, et al. Myocardial mechanics in a rat model with banding and debanding of the ascending aorta. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2014;22:189–195.
4. Gao XM, Kiriazis H, Moore XL, et al. Regression of pressure overload-induced left ventricular hypertrophy in mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2005;288:H2702–H2707.
5. Weber KT, Sun Y, Bhattacharya SK, Ahokas RA, Gerling IC. Myofibroblast-mediated mechanisms of pathological remodelling of the heart. Nat Rev Cardiol 2013;10:15–26.
6. Kakkar R, Lee RT. Intramyocardial fibroblast myocyte communication. Circ Res 2010;106:47–57.
7. Howard CM, Baudino TA. Dynamic cell-cell and cell-ECM interactions in the heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2014;70:19–26.
8. Dendooven A, Gerritsen KG, Nguyen TQ, Kok RJ, Goldschmeding R. Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/ CCN2) ELISA: a novel tool for monitoring fibrosis. Biomarkers 2011;16:289–301.
9. Lipson KE, Wong C, Teng Y, Spong S. CTGF is a central mediator of tissue remodeling and fibrosis and its inhibition can reverse the process of fibrosis. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair 2012;5(Suppl 1):S24.
10. Mori T, Kawara S, Shinozaki M, et al. Role and interaction of connective tissue growth factor with transforming growth factor-beta in persistent fibrosis: a mouse fibrosis model. J Cell Physiol 1999;181:153–159.
11. Szabo Z, Magga J, Alakoski T, et al. Connective tissue growth factor inhibition attenuates left ventricular remodeling and dysfunction in pressure overload-induced heart failure. Hypertension 2014;63:1235–1240.
12. Bauer M, Cheng S, Jain M, et al. Echocardiographic speckle-tracking based strain imaging for rapid cardiovascular phenotyping in mice. Circ Res 2011;108:908–916.
13. Gao S, Ho D, Vatner DE, Vatner SF. Echocardiography in mice. Curr Protoc Mouse Biol 2011;1:71–83.
14. Derumeaux G, Mulder P, Richard V, et al. Tissue Doppler imaging differentiates physiological from pathological pressure-overload left ventricular hypertrophy in rats. Circulation 2002;105:1602–1608.
15. Kovacs A, Olah A, Lux A, et al. Strain and strain rate by speckle-tracking echocardiography correlate with pressure-volume loop-derived contractility indices in a rat model of athlete’s heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2015;308:H743–H748.
16. Wang G, Zhang LE, Manyande A, et al. Effects of anesthesia on conventional and speckle tracking echocardiographic parameters in a mouse model of pressure overload. Exp Ther Med 2015;9:1679–1687.
17. Friedman RC, Farh KK, Burge CB, Bartel DP. Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res 2009;19:92–105.
18. Yokoi H, Mukoyama M, Nagae T, et al. Reduction in connective tissue growth factor by antisense treatment ameliorates renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004;15:1430–1440.
19. Duisters RF, Tijsen AJ, Schroen B, et al. miR-133 and miR30 regulate connective tissue growth factor: implications for a role of microRNAs in myocardial matrix remodeling. Circ Res 2009;104:170–178.
20. Gao S, Liu TW, Wang Z, et al. Downregulation of microRNA-19b contributes to angiotensin II-induced overexpression of connective tissue growth factor in cardiomyocytes. Cardiology 2014;127:114–120.
21. Guo Y, Lu X, Wang H. Downregulation of miR-18a induces CTGF and promotes proliferation and migration of sodium hyaluronate treated human corneal epithelial cells. Gene 2016;591:129–136.
22. van Almen GC, Verhesen W, van Leeuwen RE, et al. MicroRNA-18 and microRNA-19 regulate CTGF and TSP1 expression in age-related heart failure. Aging Cell 2011;10:769–779.
23. Martello A, Mellis D, Meloni M, et al. Phenotypic miRNA screen identifies miR-26b to promote the growth and survival of endothelial cells. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 2018;13:29–43.
24. Zhu Y, Lu Y, Zhang Q, et al. MicroRNA-26a/b and their host genes cooperate to inhibit the G1/S transition by activating the pRb protein. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:4615–4625.
25. Sapkota G, Knockaert M, Alarcon C, Montalvo E, Brivanlou AH, Massague J. Dephosphorylation of the linker regions of Smad1 and Smad2/3 by small C-terminal domain phosphatases has distinct outcomes for bone morphogenetic protein and transforming growth factor-beta pathways. J Biol Chem 2006;281:40412–40419.
26. Wang R, Ding X, Zhou S, et al. Microrna-26b attenuates monocrotaline-induced pulmonary vascular remodeling via targeting connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and cyclin D1 (CCND1). Oncotarget 2016;7:72746–72757.
27. Beaumont J, Lopez B, Ravassa S, et al. MicroRNA-19b is a potential biomarker of increased myocardial collagen cross-linking in patients with aortic stenosis and heart failure. Sci Rep 2017;7:40696.

Article information Continued

Figure 1.

Fibrosis in Rat2 cells was identified on the basis of the expression of collagen I and α-smooth muscle actin (αSMA). Upon transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) treatment, Collagen I increased from 18 to 24 hours, decreased by 30 hours and then increased again by 42 hours (A). After TGFβ treatment, αSMA continuously increased from 18 to 30 hours and then decreased until 42 hours. In addition, collagen I and αSMA decreased when TGFβ was removed (B). To verify the association between TGFβ-associated fibrosis and the expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), CTGF expression in Rat2 cells was examined by real-time polymerase chain reaction. The expression of CTGF was significantly increased after 24 hours of TGFβ stimulation and decreased from 6 to 24 hours after 24 hours of TGFβ washing (p < 0.05) (C) . All experiments were repeated three times for each group. The bars and error bars indicate the mean ± SD. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Figure 2.

Gross findings using Masson’s trichrome staining. Left ventricles detached from a sham rat (A, D), a rat that underwent the 6-week aortic banding procedure (B, E) and a rat that underwent the aortic debanding procedure (C, F) revealed concentric hypertrophied myocardium and increased global longitudinal strain (GLS). Concentric remodeling was relieved by the debanding operation (relative wall thickness [RWT] = 0.5), but microscopically reactive myocardial fibrosis was not significantly regressed (C, F). Compared with the GLS in the banding group, the GLS in the debanding group was not significantly improved.

Figure 3.

Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) was significantly higher in the banding group than that in the sham and debanding groups (A). Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2) and transforming growth factor-β1 (TGFβ1) tended to increase in the banding group and were significantly decreased in the debanding group (B, C). The bars and error bars indicate the mean ± SD.

Figure 4.

To analyze the fibrosis-related microRNAs (miRNAs) associated with the expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed using miRNA-specific primers. miRNA-26b, miRNA-133a, and miRNA-19b were evaluated in vivo and in vitro in the control group, the transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ)-stimulated group (the remodeling group), and the 24-hour TGFβ-washed group (the reverse remodeling group). Among these miRNAs, miRNA-26b was significantly elevated in the TGFβ-washed group (p < 0.05). miRNA-19b was significantly decreased in the TGFβ-stimulated group and the 24-hours TGFβ-washed group compared with the control group (p < 0.05). All experiments were repeated three times for each group (A-C). In vivo, the relative expression level of miRNA-26b was significantly higher in the debanding group than in the banding group (D). However, the relative expression level of miRNA-133a and miRNA-19b did not significantly change in our study (E,F). The bars and error bars indicate the mean ± SD.

Figure 5.

(A) Transfected of fibroblasts with microRNA (miRNA)-26b mimic decreased the relative expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF). (B) Stimulation of fibroblasts with transforming growth factor-β1 (TGFβ1) increased the relative expression of CTGF and decreased that of miRNA-26b. After TGFβ1 washing, CTGF expression was decreased, and miRNA-26b expression was increased.

Table 1.

Echocardiographic and histological measurements

Variable Sham group (n = 8) Banding group (n = 8) Debanding group (n = 8) p value
Age, wk 13 13 13
Weight, mg 387 ± 2.3 438 ± 39.0a 398 ± 22.3b 0.003
Heart weight/tibia length, g/m 26.8 ± 3.0 35.2 ± 3.3a 31.3 ± 4.7 0.015
Conventional echocardiography findings
 IVS, mm 1.53 ± 0.17 2.25 ± 0.19a 2.10 ± 0.29a 0.001
 LVEDD, mm 6.70 ± 0.11 6.46 ± 0.98 6.75 ± 0.54 0.739
 LVESD, mm 4.25 ± 0.26 3.60 ± 0.62 3.86 ± 0.58 0.077
 LV mass, g 0.62 ± 0.13 1.07 ± 0.18a 1.11 ± 0.15a < 0.001
 RWT 0.41 ± 0.01 0.81 ± 0.13a 0.64 ± 0.09a,c < 0.001
 LVEF, % 73.4 ± 5.26 81.5 ± 4.8a 79.1 ± 6.0 0.009
 FS 37.7 ± 4.4 45.5 ± 4.5 43.5 ± 5.3 0.013
 E, cm/sec 63.4 ± 6.0 78.0 ± 17.4 70.1 ± 13.3 0.108
 A, cm/sec 38.0 ± 3.2 45.5 ± 8.3 42.3 ± 13.5 0.317
 E/E’ 15.8 ± 1.5 21.4 ± 5.1a 20.9 ± 3.7a 0.011
 E’, cm/sec 4.0 ± 0.1 3.8 ± 0.8 3.3 ± 0.4 0.105
 A’, cm/sec 3.0 ± 0.1 3.0 ± 0.7 3.4 ± 1.0 0.387
 S’, cm/sec 3.4 ± 0.5 3.7 ± 0.7 3.5 ± 0.6 0.582
Histological findings
 IVS, mm 2.2 ± 0.13 3.06 ± 0.27a 2.75 ± 0.39a < 0.001
 LV free wall thickness, mm 2.20 ± 0.20 3.17 ± 0.26a 2.83 ± 0.26a < 0.001

Values are presented as mean ± SD.

IVS, interventricular septum; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic dimension; LV, left ventricular; RWT, relative wall thickness; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; FS, fractional shortening; E, peak early diastolic transmitral flow velocity; A, peak late diastolic transmitral flow velocity; E’, peak early diastolic mitral annular velocity; A’, peak late diastolic mitral annular velocity S’, peak systolic mitral annular velocity.

a

p < 0.05 vs. the sham group.

b

p < 0.05 vs. the banding group.

c

p < 0.05 vs. the debanding group.

Table 2.

Speckle tracking echocardiography and histological measurements

Variable Sham group (n = 8) Banding group (n = 8) Debanding group (n = 8) p value
Frames/sec 110 ± 15.7 111 ± 11.1 130 ± 42.0 0.750
Heart rate, /min 256 ± 17.0 244 ± 17.0 265 ± 9.7 0.051
Two-dimensional STE findings
 Global longitudinal strain, % –18.7 ± 1.0 –15.2 ± 2.3a –15.5 ± 2.7a 0.008
 Peak endocardial circumferential strain, % –30.1 ± 1.56 –28.1 ± 7.0 –29.3 ± 4.4 0.736
 Peak midcardial circumferential strain, % –22.5 ± 2.0 –19.2 ± 5.0 –21.4 ± 3.9 0.266
 Peak epicardial circumferential strain, % –15.9 ± 2.4 –12.7 ± 3.4 –14.8 ± 3.5 0.196
 Global peak radial strain, % 29.1 ± 2.8 29.2 ± 7.0 26.8 ± 7.2 0.647
Histological findings
 Myocyte size, µm2 741 ± 91 1,155 ± 391a 1,014 ± 220 0.016
 Fibrosis, % 0.12 ± 0.19 8.14 ± 6.0a 5.0 ± 5.8 0.012

Values are presented as mean ± SD.

STE, speckle tracking echocardiography.

a

p < 0.05 vs. the sham group.