Solitary fibrous tumor of the liver mimicking malignancy

Article information

Korean J Intern Med. 2020;35(3):734-735
Publication date (electronic) : 2019 March 8
doi : https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2018.442
1Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
2The Catholic Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
3Department of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to Seung Kew Yoon, M.D. Tel: +82-2-2258-2073 Fax: +82-2-3481-4025 E-mail: yoonsk@catholic.ac.kr
Received 2018 December 10; Revised 2019 January 13; Accepted 2019 January 13.

A 45-year-old male patient presented to our clinic for an intrahepatic mass observed on ultrasonography. His blood test, including liver function test, results were within normal ranges. Viral hepatitis markers, alpha-fetoprotein, des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin, and cancer antigen 19-9 levels were all unremarkable.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with Primovist (Bayer Healthcare, Berlin, Germany) enhancement revealed a 2.8 cm tumor (Fig. 1). The mass was well enhanced in the arterial phase, became isointense during the portal venous phase, and was identified as a defect in the hepatobiliary phase. The tumor’s radiologic features were difficult to differentiate from that of a malignant tumor such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the patient did not have any risk factors for the development of HCC, and serum tumor markers were within normal ranges. The histological results of a fine-needle liver biopsy for diagnosis showed stromal fibrosis and spindle-shaped tumor with high cellularity (Fig. 2). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed strong positivity for CD34 and CD99, but not for CD117, actin, or Ki-67. The histological results including an immunohistochemistry stain revealed typical microscopic features of solitary fibrous tumor (SFT). Because the tumor size was small, and there was no evidence of mitosis or nuclear pleomorphism, we decided on a close follow-up with ultrasonography without intervention.

Figure 1.

A magnetic resonance imaging scan revealed a mass at S8. (A) Multiple cystic portions within the tumor presented as dots with high signal intensities in the T2-weighted image. (B) T1-weighted image showing the hypoechoic mass. (C) After Primovist enhancement, the mass was well-enhanced in the arterial phase and (D) became isointense to the surrounding parenchyme during the portal venous phase. (E) The tumor appeared as a defect during the hepatobiliary phase. All arrows indicated the intrahepatic mass.

Figure 2.

(A) Stromal fibrosis in the mass analyzed by H&E staining (×40) and (B) Masson’s trichrome staining (×40). (C) The tumor contained spindle-shaped cells with high cellularity (×200). The immunohistochemical analysis showed strong positivity for (D) CD34 (×200) and (E) CD99 (×200).

SFT is a rare neoplasm arising from the mesenchymal cells. The liver is one of the most uncommon sites for SFT development and reported cases of SFT in the liver have been limited. Most patients with SFTs are asymptomatic and present with a benign clinical course. However, careful monitoring is needed because malignant change can occur.

Here, we describe a very rare intrahepatic benign tumor that mimicked malignancy. Because MRI scans were not sufficient to differentiate between a malignant and benign tumor in this case, an accurate diagnosis was obtained through a biopsy.

We received informed consent from the patient for the publication of this case.

Notes

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Article information Continued

Figure 1.

A magnetic resonance imaging scan revealed a mass at S8. (A) Multiple cystic portions within the tumor presented as dots with high signal intensities in the T2-weighted image. (B) T1-weighted image showing the hypoechoic mass. (C) After Primovist enhancement, the mass was well-enhanced in the arterial phase and (D) became isointense to the surrounding parenchyme during the portal venous phase. (E) The tumor appeared as a defect during the hepatobiliary phase. All arrows indicated the intrahepatic mass.

Figure 2.

(A) Stromal fibrosis in the mass analyzed by H&E staining (×40) and (B) Masson’s trichrome staining (×40). (C) The tumor contained spindle-shaped cells with high cellularity (×200). The immunohistochemical analysis showed strong positivity for (D) CD34 (×200) and (E) CD99 (×200).