Duration of anuria predicts recovery of renal function after acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy

Article information

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common clinical disorder, defined by an abrupt increase in serum creatinine or a decreased urine output. Clinical manifestations of AKI vary from an asymptomatic decline in renal function to anuric kidney injury, requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) [1,2]. Among patients with AKI undergoing RRT, those who are hemodynamically unstable require continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) rather than intermittent hemodialysis, regardless of the presence of pre-existing comorbid conditions. The number of critically ill patients with AKI requiring CRRT is increasing, and the mortality of patients with severe AKI is as high as 80%, despite advances in renal replacement techniques and critical care medicine [3].

Aside from mortality, renal outcomes after AKI are also important. Previous reports demonstrated that survivors after AKI have an increased risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), although any causal relationship and the pathogenesis remain unclear [4,5]. A recent study showed that renal recovery status after AKI was also associated with progression to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and ESRD, as well as patient survival [6]. Moreover, while AKI leads to CKD and ESRD, large retrospective cohort studies have also reported that CKD is a risk factor for the development of AKI [4,7].

Although concerns regarding the bidirectional relationship between AKI and CKD are increasing, the incidence rate of and the factors predicting persistent renal injury in critically ill patients with AKI receiving CRRT are not well known. Identifying risk factors leading to incomplete renal recovery after AKI is crucial for predicting outcomes in survivors of AKI and reducing the burden of CKD in the general population. In this study, we investigated renal outcomes and the factors associated with incomplete renal recovery in AKI patients who received CRRT.

METHODS

RESULTS

In total, 408 patients were treated with CRRT during the study period. We excluded 300 patients who died during hospitalization or were lost to follow-up. Among the 108 surviving patients (26.5%), 50 were diagnosed with CKD or ESRD. Of the 58 AKI patients without previous CKD or ESRD, 36 (62.1%) showed complete recovery to base-line renal function or an eGFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m². Moreover, 20 AKI patients (34.5%) did not recover their baseline renal function and two patients (3.4%) received maintenance dialysis after the withdrawal of CRRT, suggesting that 37.9% of the patients with AKI sustained a persistent renal injury. The data of 56 AKI patients who were discharged without further RRT were ultimately analyzed; these were divided into two groups based on their eGFR values 3 months after discharge (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Study selection diagram. In total, 408 patients treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) were initially enrolled. In the final analysis, 56 patients were divided into two groups (complete vs. incomplete renal recovery) based on their final estimated glomerular filtration rate values. ESRD, end-stage renal disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; AKI, acute kidney injury.

During a mean follow-up of 8 months, 20 of the 56 AKI patients (35.7%) who received no further RRT recovered their renal function incompletely. The complete recovery group was younger than the incomplete recovery group (56.3 ± 15.2 years vs. 66.4 ± 11.4 years, p = 0.014). In addition, the complete recovery group showed shorter durations of anuria (56.28 ± 92.6 hours vs. 201.3 ± 219.8 hours, p = 0.001) and CRRT (87.8 ± 57.0 hours vs. 140.2 ± 78.9 hours, p = 0.006) compared with the incomplete recovery group. Baseline conditions, causes of AKI, BMI, initial Hb, initial CRP, initial Cr, average MAP, and volume balance did not differ significantly between the two groups. Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of AKI patients treated with CRRT

Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that age (OR, 1.061; CI, 1.009 to 1.116; p = 0.021), ischemic ATN as the cause of AKI (OR, 4.714; CI, 0.868 to 25.612; p = 0.073), CRRT duration (OR, 1.012; CI, 1.003 to 1.022; p = 0.013), and anuria duration (OR, 1.038; CI, 1.010 to 1.066; p = 0.007) were significant risk factors for incomplete recovery after AKI. Age (OR, 1.198; CI, 1.063 to 1.351; p = 0.003), ischemic ATN (OR, 10.185; CI, 0.905 to 114.630; p = 0.060), CRRT duration (OR, 1.023; CI, 1.004 to 1.043; p = 0.020), and anuria duration (OR, 1.059; CI, 1.007 to 1.114; p = 0.026) remained significant after adjusting for age, ischemic ATN, infection-related ATN, CRRT duration, and anuria duration. Multivariate analysis results, fully adjusted for gender, diabetes, hypertension, cause of AKI, duration of CRRT, anuria duration, initial Hb, initial CRP, initial eGFR, average MAP, and volume balance, revealed that only two factors, age (OR, 1.231; CI, 1.041 to 1.457; p = 0.015) and duration of anuria (OR, 1.064; CI, 1.001 to 1.131; p = 0.047), were significant risk factors for incomplete renal recovery after AKI (Table 2).

Table 2.

Multiple logistic regression analysis of factors that increased the risk of incomplete recovery after acute kidney injury

To compare the distribution of anuria duration between the two groups, we divided the duration of anuria into subcategories: shorter than 12 hours, 12 to 24 hours, 1 to 3 days, 3 to 10 days, and longer than 10 days. Compared with the incomplete recovery group, the complete recovery group included a significantly higher percentage of patients whose anuria duration was shorter than 12 hours (53% vs. 10%, p = 0.001) (Fig. 2). Conversely, the percentage of patients with an anuria duration longer than 10 days was significantly higher in the incomplete recovery group than in the complete recovery group (30% vs. 6%, p = 0.023) (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Comparison of anuria duration between the complete and incomplete recovery groups. The complete recovery group showed a significantly higher percentage of patients whose anuria duration was shorter than 12 hours compared with the incomplete recovery group. Conversely, the incomplete recovery group showed a significantly higher percentage of patients whose anuria duration was longer than 10 days compared with the complete recovery group. ^ap = 0.001, ^bp =0.023, compared with the incomplete recovery group.

ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve of anuria duration for predicting incomplete recovery of renal function after AKI was 0.776, indicating that duration of anuria could be considered a fair predictor of incomplete renal recovery [8]. A cut-off anuria duration of 24 hours could predict incomplete renal recovery with a sensitivity of 85.0% and a specificity of 66.7% (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for duration of anuria. The area under the curve of anuria duration for predicting incomplete renal recovery after acute kidney injury was 0.776. A cut-off anuria duration of 24 hours could predict incomplete renal recovery with a sensitivity of 85.0% and a specificity of 66.7%.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we investigated factors associated with renal outcome in AKI patients treated with CRRT. Among the surviving severe AKI patients, approximately 37.9% showed persistent renal injury, requiring maintenance dialysis or incomplete recovery with a GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m². We found that a long duration of anuria was an independent risk factor for incomplete recovery of renal function after CRRT. Additionally, our data suggest that anuria lasting for more than 24 hours is a good predictor of incomplete renal recovery. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report an association of anuria duration with renal recovery in AKI patients treated with CRRT.

As the incidence of AKI has increased over the past 20 years, the incidence of AKI requiring CRRT, the most severe form of AKI, has also been reported to be increasing rapidly, averaging a 10% increase per year [9,10]. Recent epidemiological studies have shown that AKI itself could increase the risk of developing incident CKD and further ESRD [4,5,11]. Even full recovery to normal renal function after AKI was associated with an increased risk of CKD [12]. It is evident that patients with AKI share several common risk factors: obesity, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and microalbuminuria, factors that also increase the risk of CKD development [13].

However, the factors thought to be associated with incomplete renal recovery in AKI patients remain controversial. Schmitt et al. [14] performed a meta-analysis of 17 studies involving 5,529 patients to examine the recovery of kidney function after AKI. The studies showed significant heterogeneity in the definition of renal recovery, comorbid factors, study design, and length of follow-up. As a result, with the exception of age older than 65 years, no significant risk factor was identified. The findings from studies of AKI patients who received RRT are also very heterogeneous, making it difficult to draw conclusions regarding any predictor of renal recovery. Schiffl [15] reported that neither clinical features nor dialysis duration were associated with partial recovery in a single-center prospective study. Similarly, Allegretti et al. [16] analyzed a prospective cohort of AKI patients initiated on CRRT and found that no demographic or laboratory parameter significantly predicted renal recovery in discharged patients. In contrast, a randomized controlled trial comparing intermittent dialysis with CRRT performed by Mehta et al. [17] showed that severity of illness was an important factor in renal recovery. Uehlinger et al. [18] found that pre-existing CKD was an independent predictor of renal recovery. In the recent retrospective study by Ng et al. [19], the presence of sepsis was included as an independent predictor of renal recovery. These differing results may be attributable to differences in RRT modality, the definition of AKI, or the criteria for renal recovery.

The current study enrolled patients treated with CRRT who manifested severe AKI and cardiovascular instability. There was no difference in underlying disease or laboratory findings between the complete and incomplete renal recovery groups. Multiple regression analysis revealed that age and anuria duration were independent predictors of renal recovery. These findings are consistent with those of Augustine et al. [20], who reported that urine output on day 1 and preserved urine output on day 3 were independently correlated with renal recovery. In that study, the definition of renal recovery was being free from dialysis therapy. The comparison was performed between patients with renal recovery and patients who died or still required maintenance dialysis, which meant that preserved urine volume in the early dialysis period would be associated with cessation of dialysis, regardless of complete recovery to previous renal function. The clinical significance of urine output in renal recovery was somewhat different from our study, in which urine output might be a prognostic marker even in AKI patients who did not need further dialysis therapy.

Several studies have evaluated the clinical implications of urine output monitoring in patients with CRRT. Suzuki et al. [21] investigated whether urine output was associated with the survival of AKI patients receiving CRRT in a small, randomized trial that used urine output as a criterion for starting CRRT after coronary bypass graft surgery. They compared patient survival between the early start group, which initiated dialysis therapy when urine volume decreased to less than 30 mL/hr for 3 consecutive hours, and the late start group, which delayed dialysis therapy until urine volume reached less than 20 mL/hr for 2 consecutive hours. The 14-day survival was significantly superior in the early start group, suggesting that urine volume was a good indicator for starting CRRT. Another retrospective study, by Oh et al. [22], explored the impact of 6-hour urine volume immediately before CRRT start on the survival of AKI patients. They found that 28-day survival rates were significantly higher in the nonoliguric group (6-hour urine output > 107 mL) than in the oliguric group (6-hour urine output ≤ 107 mL). As well as a criterion for CRRT start, urine volume would also be applicable as a predictor of redialysis after CRRT weaning. Wu et al. [23] compared the characteristics of patients with successful and failed weaning of postoperative RRT. A longer duration of dialysis, multiple organ failure, urine output < 100 mL for 8 hours on the first dialysis day, and age over 65 years were independent predictors for resuming dialysis within 30 days. In other studies by Uchino et al. [24] and Heise et al. [25], increased urine output was also independently associated with CRRT discontinuation and could thus predict the restoration of kidney function. Taken together with our study, these results indicate that urine output monitoring is a simple but useful clinical method of discriminating the proper timing of CRRT initiation, weaning, and further predicting the recovery of renal function after CRRT.

Measurement of urine output is practical in AKI patients; several AKI guidelines have introduced it as a diagnostic criterion along with Cr [1,2]. A decrease in urine output for a certain duration was considered to be a sensitive and easily discernible means of identifying AKI patients. However, urine volume may be influenced by volume status, diuretic dose, and hemodynamic stability [26,27]. Furthermore, the nonoliguric type of AKI can be associated with a relatively normal urine output [28]. Despite these limitations, previous studies have shown that urine volume has an independent association with outcomes in AKI patients, regardless of other clinical parameters [20,24]. It is a remarkable finding of our study that, although urine volume itself is an important marker of AKI, the duration of decreased urine volume could also reflect renal injury and thus predict renal recovery. To validate our result, further prospective studies evaluating the impact of anuria duration on long-term renal outcomes in AKI patients receiving CRRT would be needed.

The findings of the current study are interesting; we were unable to find similar results in other studies. However, several limitations should be addressed. First, the number of patients was relatively small. This was due to the high mortality and morbidity in severe AKI patients. Nevertheless, the multivariate analysis identified duration of anuria as a statistically significant independent factor. Second, the follow-up duration may have been too short to determine recovery of renal function. Severe AKI cases take longer to return to baseline renal function [29]; however, the severity of AKI itself is known to be associated with CKD progression [30]. Third, the impact of anuria on patient survival could not be evaluated because only surviving patients after CRRT were included in the analysis. Despite these limitations, a compelling outcome of our study is the identification of anuria duration, a simple practical parameter, as a good prognostic marker in a relatively heterogeneous AKI patient group.

In conclusion, the renal outcome of severe AKI requiring CRRT was poor even in patients with previously normal renal function. Long-lasting insufficient urine volume predicted decreased renal function after recovery from severe AKI requiring CRRT. Long-term monitoring of renal function is warranted, especially in severe AKI patients who are old and have a long duration of anuria.

KEY MESSAGE

Article information Continued