Factors related to outcomes in lupus-related protein-losing enteropathy

Article information

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Protein-losing enteropathy (PLE) is characterized by an excessive loss of serum proteins into the gastrointestinal tract leading to hypoalbuminemia and peripheral edema. PLE can be caused by various diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease, sarcoidosis, intestinal malignancy, infectious diseases of the gastrointestinal tract, cardiac diseases, and autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [1].

Lupus-related PLE (lupus PLE) is a rare manifestation of SLE. Hence, most previous reports involved isolated cases or small series of patients, making it difficult to establish the clinical or laboratory features, proper management, and prognosis. In this study, based on the experience accumulated since our previous report [2], we have attempted to identify the distinctive features of lupus PLE compared with idiopathic PLE, and verify the factors involved in the treatment response or outcome of lupus PLE.

METHODS

We reviewed the electronic records of 34 patients who received a diagnosis of PLE in a tertiary hospital in South Korea from March 1998 to March 2014. Among these 34 patients, 14 cases were diagnosed with SLE according to the 1997 revised American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification of SLE [3] (the lupus PLE group), whereas an underlying cause was not identified in seven patients (i.e., the idiopathic PLE group) (Fig. 1). The other 13 cases of PLE were associated with Crohn’s disease (n = 1), infectious enteritis (n = 4), amyloidosis (n = 2), colon cancer (n = 1), liver cirrhosis (n = 3), and heart failure (n = 2). The diagnosis of PLE was made using a combination of the following: (1) protein leakage from the gastrointestinal tract by either technetium 99m-labelled human albumin scanning or fecal α1-antitrypsin clearance; (2) no evidence of a significant loss of protein from other sources; and (3) no evidence of reduced protein synthesis such as severe liver disease or large liver resection.

Figure 1.

Overview of the protein losing enteropathy (PLE) patients in this study.

Clinical information was collected within the following areas: demographic characteristics, clinical features, laboratory data, radiological imaging, and histological features from a bowel biopsy. For the lupus PLE patients, autoantibody profiles (anti-double stranded DNA antibodies, anti-nuclear antibodies, and anti-extractable nuclear antibodies), lupus anticoagulant complements, and the SLE disease activity index were additionally obtained at the time of PLE diagnosis. A positive steroid response was determined if the serum albumin level returned to ≥ 3.0 g/dL within 4 weeks of initial steroid therapy. Remission was defined as a maintained serum albumin level of ≥ 3.0 g/dL for at least 3 months. High serum total cholesterol was a serum total cholesterol level of ≥ 240 mg/dL.

Lupus PLE patients were initially treated with intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg/day and switched to oral prednisolone. If they obtained a positive steroid response, prednisolone was tapered off slowly over a period of 10 months. If a positive steroid response was not achieved, another immunosuppressive therapy such as monthly IV cyclophosphamide pulse therapy (500 to 750 mg/m²/month) or oral azathioprine 50 to 100 mg/day was combined with the prednisolone treatment.

Data were analyzed with SPSS version 18.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All continuous variables were expressed as the mean ± SD. Categorical variables were reported as numbers and percentages. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical variables were compared using the chisquare test or a Fisher exact test. Statistical significance was defined as a two tailed p value of less than 0.05.

This study fulfilled the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki (Edinburgh 2000) and received approval from the Institutional Review Board of the Asan Medical Center.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics of lupus PLE and idiopathic PLE in our study patients are indicated in Table 1. Patients with lupus PLE tended to be younger and were more likely to be female than patients with idiopathic PLE. In our lupus PLE patients, the white blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and serum total cholesterol levels were significantly increased (p < 0.05). However, the lymphocyte, protein, albumin, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were not found to differ between the two groups.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the lupus PLE and idiopathic PLE patients in this study

Eight patients with lupus PLE and four patients with idiopathic PLE were diagnosed with PLE based on the technetium 99m-labelled human albumin scanning. Among these lupus PLE patients, the most common albumin leakage site was the small intestine (n = 4), followed by the small and large intestine (n = 2) and stomach (n = 2). Endoscopic biopsies were performed on the stomach, small intestine, or large bowel in 10 patients with lupus PLE and four patients with idiopathic PLE. For patients with human albumin scanning, biopsies were taken from the suspected albumin-leakage site (Table 2). Histological findings from the lupus PLE patients were mostly of non-specific abnormalities, including chronic inflammation with mild edema, except for one biopsy specimen from the jejunum, which showed marked blunting and atrophy of the jejunal villi (#10, who was categorized as being in the negative steroid response group). Among the idiopathic PLE patients, two patients had villi edema with lymphatic dilatation while the other two patients showed non-specific chronic inflammation.

Table 2.

Histological findings of specimens acquired from endoscopic biopsies

Among the lupus PLE patients, eight patients (57.1%) were female and 11 patients (78.6%) initially presented with PLE at the time when SLE was diagnosed. The mean follow-up duration for lupus PLE was 55.8 ± 16.0 months (range, 8 to 179). One patient had had a history of lupus nephritis class IV 2.5 years ago; however, her 24-hour urine protein was less than 500 mg/day at the time of PLE diagnosis.

As shown in Table 3, eight patients had a positive steroid response and serum total cholesterol levels were significantly elevated in the positive steroid response group compared to the negative steroid response group. However, there were no differences in other parameters, such as ESR, CRP, C3, C4, and albumin. A high serum total cholesterol level (≥ 240 mg/dL) was evident in seven out of the eight patients (87.5%) in the positive steroid response group, but not in any of the cases in the negative steroid response group. A high serum total cholesterol level was significantly associated with a positive steroid response (odds ratio [OR], 7.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14 to 42.97; p = 0.005). Moreover, a positive steroid response was related to remission within 6 months (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 0.97 to 9.30; p = 0.015). Irrespective of the treatment regimen, once lupus PLE patients underwent remission, the serum total cholesterol level, ESR, and CRP decreased and the complement level recovered (data not shown).

Table 3.

Clinical parameters related to the initial steroid response

Among our lupus PLE cases, the 10 patients who achieved remission within 6 months showed a higher serum total cholesterol level (283.3 ± 79.3 mg/dL) than the four patients who did not (165.3 ± 63.9 mg/dL). Among these 10 patients, only one patient experienced a relapse 3 years after remission; this patient was treated again with prednisolone (1 mg/kg/day) only to obtain a positive steroid response and remission within 6 months (Table 4). Among the four patients who did not achieve remission within 6 months, three did not obtain remission during their follow-up duration of 10, 24, and 60 months, respectively. The other patient achieved remission at 13 months after a combination treatment with prednisolone and cyclophosphamide, but relapsed 6 years after remission. This patient subsequently achieved remission within 6 months by initial combination treatment with both prednisolone and azathioprine.

Table 4.

The management and outcome of the patients with lupus protein losing enteropathy

DISCUSSION

In contrast to idiopathic PLE, an elevated serum total cholesterol level is relatively common in lupus PLE [4-9], possibly because the main mechanism underlying these conditions is different. In lymphangiectasia, which is considered to be the main pathogenesis of idiopathic PLE, most serum components, such as albumin, gamma globulin, cholesterol, and lymphocyte, can be decreased [10]. However, complement-mediated vascular injury or cytokines related to increased endothelial permeability have been regarded as a possible mechanism for lupus PLE, which allows a more selective leakage of small diameter particles such as albumin [2]. Moreover, hypoalbuminemia triggers hepatic lipoprotein synthesis and inhibits lipoprotein catabolism, resulting in severe hypoalbuminemia with hypercholesterolemia, as with similar mechanisms such as nephrotic syndrome [11]. In our current analyses, the serum total cholesterol level was found to be significantly higher in the lupus PLE patients, as also observed in a previous report [2]. In addition, regarding the pathologic features, lymphatic dilatation was not found in the patients with lupus PLE, whereas half of the patients in our study population with idiopathic PLE showed lymphatic dilatation.

In our present investigation we found that a high serum total cholesterol level was associated with an initial steroid response in patients with lupus PLE. This might suggest in the first instance that lupus PLE patients with a high serum total cholesterol level had less severe gastrointestinal barrier damage and, therefore, showed a better response to steroid treatment without other immunosuppressants. In addition, a short duration of symptoms appears to be associated with a favorable initial steroid response. As displayed in Table 3, the patients in the positive steroid response group were treated early (mean duration, 6.4 weeks) compared to those in the negative response group (16.0 weeks). A long duration of symptoms seems to indicate an inevitable exposure to inflammatory destruction over a long period of time, which can cause more severe or irreversible gastrointestinal barrier damage in lupus PLE.

In our lupus PLE patients, the lipid profiles were initially checked in only five cases (four from the positive steroid response group and one from the negative steroid response group). All lipid fractions, from high density lipoprotein (HDL) to triglyceride (TG), were reduced in the patients from the negative steroid response group (HDL, 24 mg/dL [normal range, ≥ 40]; TG, 78 mg/dL [normal range, ≤ 199]). Among the four patients with a positive steroid response, three patients showed low HDL levels (13, 19, and 20 mg/dL, respectively) but high TG levels (215, 249, and 223 mg/dL, respectively). This finding might be because TG is the main component of hypercholesterolemia in lupus PLE, which can be associated with a favorable treatment response.

Compared to the our previous report [2], the follow-up period in this study was extended and the number of lupus patients were increased so that the data could be properly analyzed through the use of statistical tools. Therefore, we consider that these changes make our previous results more convincing.

Our present study has some limitations. First, all of our subjects were recruited from a single tertiary center and the series was relatively small. Thus, a selection bias could have influenced our findings and our results will need to be confirmed in a future larger-sized, multicenter study. Second, many biopsy samples were obtained from the stomach, which is a limiting factor considering that most loss of protein occurred from the small intestine in the lupus PLE patients [1,10]. Two lupus PLE patients underwent gastric biopsies due to protein leakage from the stomach on the human albumin scan. The other gastric biopsies were mainly obtained from patients without a human albumin scan because it was not easy to perform random biopsies from the small intestine without prior evidence of protein leakage. Third, the biopsy specimens from our lupus PLE patients were not immunochemically stained, which makes it difficult to assess the immune-mediated process of this disease. Finally, we were not able to check the levels of cholesterol subtypes in all patients. As different cholesterol subtypes have different molecular weights, the levels of these subtypes may possibly explain the degree of lymphatic destruction or might show other findings that could aid our understanding of the pathogenesis of lupus PLE.

In conclusion, a high serum total cholesterol level could be a predictive factor of an initial steroid response, suggesting a good response to steroid therapy alone. Moreover, the early detection and treatment of PLE could also be associated with the initial steroid response.

KEY MESSAGE

Article information Continued