| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us
Korean J Intern Med > Volume 28(5); 2013 > Article
Maurya, Tewari, Sharma, and Shukla: Expression of procaspase 3 and activated caspase 3 and its relevance in hormone-responsive gallbladder carcinoma chemotherapy

Abstract

Background/Aims

The higher incidence of gallbladder cancer (GBC) in females has been accredited to the involvement of hormones. The clinical implications of sex hormone receptors in GBC are well established. Cysteine proteases (such as caspase-3-9, etc.) are known to play a central role in the apoptotic pathway. Of these, the downstream enzyme caspase-3 is often activated in the apoptotic pathway. The aim of this work was to examine the status of apoptosis (which directly correlated with the level of active caspase-3) in hormone-responsive GBC.

Methods

We used 10 androgen receptor (AR)-positive, 14 estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, 12 HER/neu-positive, eight triple positive, and 10 triple negative malignant GBC human tissue samples. We isolated the total cellular protein from tumor tissues and carried out Western blotting using antipro-caspase-3 and anti-activated caspase-3 antibodies.

Results

ER and HER/neu-positive GBC exhibited high caspase-3 activity and low procaspase-3 activity, whereas AR-positive GBC showed no significant level of apoptosis. We also evaluated the apoptosis status of triple positive GBC and triple negative GBC, and found significant apoptosis in triple positive GBC.

Conclusions

The results indicate that ER and HER/neu-positive GBCs had active apoptosis, whereas AR-positive GBC was highly resistant to apoptosis.

INTRODUCTION

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is a gastrointestinal and often fatal malignancy, ranked fifth overall and the third most common biliary tract malignancy [1,2]. Correct diagnosis at a time which would enable a cure for GBC remains problematic due to its asymptomatic nature during the initial stages [3,4]. In general, it is one of the most aggressive biliary cancers with a very short survival duration [5]. The higher incidence of GBC in females has been attributed in part to hormonal factors, including estrogen and progesterone receptor expression and their effects on GBC prognosis [6,7]. Many other reports have also referred to the effects of hormone receptor status in GBC [8-14]. More recently, a significant correlation between hormone receptor polymorphism and gallbladder (GB) carcinogenesis has been reported [15]. Androgen receptor (AR) CAG repeats have been directly correlated with gallstone formation and GB carcinogenesis [16]. These studies have shown that hormone receptors are important for GB carcinogenesis, with whole GB resection being the preferred curative treatment [17]. Adjuvant chemotherapy and molecular-targeted therapy are potential therapeutic options for advanced-stage cancer. In GBC, due to its typically late diagnosis and presentation, chemotherapy is administered before surgical removal of the GB tumor. It is therefore vital to develop new drugs for GBC, with a view to combating the cancer at the molecular level.
There are 14 caspases in mammals [18,19]. The initiator caspases (e.g., caspases 8, 9, and 10) are activated by apoptotic stimulation, which activates further effector caspases [20]. Additionally, many studies have shown that active caspase-3 is needed to induce apoptosis in response to chemotherapeutic treatments using regimens such as taxanes, 5-fluorouracil, and doxorubicin [21-24]. Caspase-3 is synthesized as a 32-kDa proenzyme, which is cleaved into 12- and 17-kDa subunits. Two 12-kDa and two 17-kDa subunits are reassociated to form the functionally active caspase-3 enzyme [25]. After activation, the effector caspases, which include caspase-3, -6, and -7, initiate the cleavage of many key cellular proteins, including poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase, inhibitors of caspase-activated DNase, gelsolin, 4-GDI, α- and β-fodrin, and epidermal growth factor receptors [19,26]. These cellular proteins cause blebbing of the membrane, condensation of chromatin and DNA fragmentation. Based on the central role played by caspase-3 in apoptosis, we assessed the expression levels of procaspase-3 and activated caspase-3 in advanced GB tumor tissue samples to determine the apoptotic status of estrogen receptor (ER)-, AR-, and HER/neu-positive GBC tissues.

METHODS

Sample collection

GB tumor tissue was collected from the surgical oncology operation theater at the Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India by H.S.S. and M.T. Tumor samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80℃. Parts of the tumors were sent to the Department of Pathology at the Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University for histopathology and hormone receptor profiling. Well-characterized and histopathologically proven malignant tumors were selected. A total of 10 AR-positive, 14 ER-positive, 12 HER/neu-positive, eight triple positive, and 10 triple negative malignant tissue samples were selected for this study. None of the patients had received preoperative radiotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy. This study was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of the Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.

Protein isolation and Western blotting

Protein isolation and quantization were carried out according to methods described previously [27]. Equal amounts of GB tissue cellular proteins were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The proteins were electrotransferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Antisera against procaspase-3 (ab13586, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), active caspase-3 (Cell Signaling, Boston, MA, USA), and β-actin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used, with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) depending on the primary antibody. The specific bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Abcam). Autoradiograms were quantified by densitometry using Alpha Innotech software (Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, CA, USA). The same membrane was reprobed with a β-actin-specific antibody as a loading control. Relative protein levels were calculated compared to the β-actin standard.

Statistical analysis

Student t test was used to determine significance levels (SPSS version 11, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) in paired data. For multiple comparison, a two-way analysis of variance was used. Differences with value of p < 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Caspase-3 expression in triple positive and negative hormone receptors of GBC

Procaspase-3 and activated caspase-3 expression was evaluated in AR-, ER-, and HER-positive and negative GBC samples. In triple negative GBC, the mean levels of procaspase-3 and activated caspase-3 expression were similar (p < 0.834). Activated caspase-3 expression was significantly higher than that of procaspase-3 in triple positive GBC (p < 0.01) (Fig. 1). The ratio of procaspase-3 to activated caspase-3 was 0.98 in triple negative, and 0.803 in triple positive samples. These data indicate that the apoptotic rate of triple positive GBC is ~17.7% higher than that in triple negative GBC.

Caspase-3 expression in AR-, ER-, and HER/neu-positive GBC

In triple negative GBC, no significant differences were observed between procaspase-3 and activated caspase-3 levels. Further, expression of procaspase-3 and activated caspase-3 proteins was assessed in only AR-, ER-, and HER/neu-positive GBC. The maximum expression level of caspase-3 was observed in ER-positive GBC (2.1 times higher than AR-positive, 1.4 times higher than HER/neu-positive), followed by HER/neu- (1.4 times higher than AR-positive) and AR-positive GBC. The expression of activated caspase-3 was significantly higher than that of procaspase-3 in ER-positive cases (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between procaspase-3 and active caspase-3 expression in AR-positive (p < 0.845) cases. HER/neu-positive cases were similar to ER-positive cases. Activated caspase-3 expression was significantly higher than that of procaspase-3 (p < 0.0346) (Fig. 2). Overall, ER- and HER/neu-positive cases were similar in their molecular nature, whereas AR-positive cases exhibited a difference in the expression of the apoptosis-functional protein caspase-3.

DISCUSSION

Chemoresistance is a principal cause of treatment failure in many cancers. To date, our understanding or resistance to cancer drugs remains limited. In order to identify and study hormone receptor expression and apoptosis rates, we have assayed procaspase-3 and active caspase-3 proteins in GB carcinoma. We show here that a triple negative hormone receptor GBC demonstrates less active apoptosis, whereas a triple positive hormone receptor expressing GBC demonstrates more active apoptosis. This indicates that expressing GBC hormone receptors may be more sensitive to hormone-dependent chemotherapeutic agents. As hormone receptors play a role in cancer initiation, it is important to study the status of apoptosis in hormones involved in GBC. Endocrine therapy using tamoxifen, a selective ER modulator, and aromatase inhibitors, which ablate peripheral estrogen synthesis, have been shown to substantially improve disease-free survival [28]. We first assessed procaspase-3 and active caspase-3 expression in triple negative and triple positive GBC so as to identify a correlation between hormone receptor expression and the rate of apoptosis. This information is clinically important because caspase-3 activation is necessary for initiation of apoptosis and regulation of processes such as membrane blebbing and internucleosomal DNA fragmentation. Caspase-3 expression in the MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line (caspase-3 deficient) revives the apoptotic response [28-30]. Caspase-3 is also involved in breast cancer apoptosis when cells are exposed to anthracyclines [23,31,32] and cisplatin [33-36]. Apoptosis failure is a crucial step in the initiation and progression of cancer. High apoptotic rates have been reported in invasive cancers compare to the paired normal rates [37-40]. We found no significant difference between procaspase-3 and active caspase-3 expression in triple negative GBC. However, we found a significantly higher active caspase-3 concentration in triple positive GBC, which exhibits high apoptotic activity. Our results show that triple negative GBC is more resistant to apoptosis than triple positive GBC. This information can be used clinically to select chemotherapeutic drugs in a hormone-dependent or independent manner. For therapeutic chemotherapy, triple positive GBC is more sensitive to apoptosis-inducing agents than is triple negative GBC.
To investigate the effects of hormones in more detail, we selected ER-, AR-, and HER/neu-positive GBC and assayed procaspase-3 and active caspase-3 by Western blotting. ER-positive GBC showed significant expression of active caspase-3, indicating that the ER-positive cases were more susceptible to apoptosis and had a high rate of internal apoptosis. Supplementary induction of apoptosis by chemotherapeutic agents may thus accelerate its effect. HER/neu-positive GBC also exhibited high active caspase-3 expression. However, the AR-positive GBC results were interesting, in terms of the increased levels of active procaspase-3 and less active caspase-3 expression, compared to ER- and HER/neu-positive GBC. Overall, the level of caspase-3 protein was lowest among other hormone-responsive GBC, with AR being the least sensitive to apoptosis.
In conclusion, our findings reflect the status of apoptosis in GBC, and indicated that ER- and HER/neu-positive GBC tumors are highly sensitive to apoptosis and may respond better to chemotherapeutic drugs such as tamoxifen, whereas AR-positive GBC is more resistant to apoptosis and hence requires more aggressive treatment than ER- and HER/neu-positive GBC.

KEY MESSAGE

1. HER and estrogen receptor (ER) positive gallbladder tumors have more sensitivity for apoptosis compare to androgen receptor (AR) positive gallbladder tumors.
2. HER and ER positive gallbladder tumor may give better chemotherapy response in comparison to AR positive gallbladder tumor with apoptotic inducing drugs.
3. AR positive gallbladder cancer may require more aggressive treatment compare to HER and ER positive gallbladder cancer.

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank University Grant Commission, New Delhi, India for financial support.

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article is reported.

References

1. Gracie WA, Ransohoff DF. The natural history of silent gallstones: the innocent gallstone is not a myth. N Engl J Med 1982;307:798–800PMID : 7110244.
crossref pmid
2. Shaffer EA. Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease: has the paradigm changed in the 21st century? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2005;7:132–140PMID : 15802102.
crossref pmid
3. Tewari M, Kumar V, Mishra RR, Shukla HS. Gallbladder carcinoid masquerading as gallbladder carcinoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2009;8:326–328PMID : 19502178.
pmid
4. Dhulkotia A, Kumar S, Kabra V, Shukla HS. Aberrant gallbladder situated beneath the left lobe of liver. HPB (Oxford) 2002;4:39–42PMID : 18333151.
crossref pmid pmc
5. Shukla HS, Awasthi K, Naithani YP, Gupta SC. A clinico-pathological study of carcinoma of the gall bladder. Indian J Cancer 1981;18:198–201PMID : 7309124.
pmid
6. Ohnami S, Nakata H, Nagafuchi Y, Zeze F, Eto S. Estrogen receptors in human gastric, hepatocellular, and gallbladder carcinomas and normal liver tissues. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 1988;15:2923–2928PMID : 2845868.
pmid
7. Nakamura S, Muro H, Suzuki S. Estrogen and progesterone receptors in gallbladder cancer. Jpn J Surg 1989;19:189–194PMID : 2657151.
crossref pmid
8. Barreto SG, Haga H, Shukla PJ. Hormones and gallbladder cancer in women. Indian J Gastroenterol 2009;28:126–130PMID : 19937419.
crossref pmid
9. Egawa N, Tu Y, Kamisawa T. Why is gallbladder cancer more frequent in women than in men? Nihon Rinsho 2006;64(Suppl 1):344–347PMID : 16457279.
pmid
10. Sumi K, Matsuyama S, Kitajima Y, Miyazaki K. Loss of estrogen receptor beta expression at cancer front correlates with tumor progression and poor prognosis of gallbladder cancer. Oncol Rep 2004;12:979–984PMID : 15492781.
crossref pmid
11. Ko CY, Schmit P, Cheng L, Thompson JE. Estrogen receptors in gallbladder cancer: detection by an improved immunohistochemical assay. Am Surg 1995;61:930–933PMID : 7668471.
pmid
12. Chen A, Huminer D. The role of estrogen receptors in the development of gallstones and gallbladder cancer. Med Hypotheses 1991;36:259–260PMID : 1787822.
crossref pmid
13. Yamamoto M, Nakajo S, Tahara E. Immunohistochemical analysis of estrogen receptors in human gallbladder. Acta Pathol Jpn 1990;40:14–21PMID : 2316369.
crossref pmid
14. Gupta P, Agarwal A, Gupta V, Singh PK, Pantola C, Amit S. Expression and clinicopathological significance of estrogen and progesterone receptors in gallbladder cancer. Gastrointest Cancer Res 2012;5:41–47PMID : 22690257.
pmid pmc
15. Park SK, Andreotti G, Rashid A, et al. Polymorphisms of estrogen receptors and risk of biliary tract cancers and gallstones: a population-based study in Shanghai, China. Carcinogenesis 2010;31:842–846PMID : 20172949.
crossref pmid pmc
16. Srivastava A, Sharma KL, Srivastava N, Misra S, Mittal B. Significant role of estrogen and progesterone receptor sequence variants in gallbladder cancer predisposition: a multi-analytical strategy. PLoS One 2012;7:e40162. PMID : 22808109.
crossref pmid pmc
17. Meyer TE, O'Brien TG, Andreotti G, et al. Androgen receptor CAG repeat length and risk of biliary tract cancer and stones. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010;19:787–793PMID : 20200439.
crossref pmid pmc
18. Zacks SL, Sandler RS, Rutledge R, Brown RS Jr. A population-based cohort study comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:334–340PMID : 11866270.
crossref pmid
19. Evan GI, Vousden KH. Proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis in cancer. Nature 2001;411:342–348PMID : 11357141.
crossref pmid
20. Johnstone RW, Ruefli AA, Lowe SW. Apoptosis: a link between cancer genetics and chemotherapy. Cell 2002;108:153–164PMID : 11832206.
crossref pmid
21. Slee EA, Harte MT, Kluck RM, et al. Ordering the cytochrome c-initiated caspase cascade: hierarchical activation of caspases-2, -3, -6, -7, -8, and -10 in a caspase-9-dependent manner. J Cell Biol 1999;144:281–292PMID : 9922454.
crossref pmid pmc
22. Keane MM, Ettenberg SA, Nau MM, Russell EK, Lipkowitz S. Chemotherapy augments TRAIL-induced apoptosis in breast cell lines. Cancer Res 1999;59:734–741PMID : 9973225.
pmid
23. Bellarosa D, Ciucci A, Bullo A, et al. Apoptotic events in a human ovarian cancer cell line exposed to anthracyclines. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001;296:276–283PMID : 11160608.
pmid
24. Kottke TJ, Blajeski AL, Martins LM, et al. Comparison of paclitaxel-, 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine-, and epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced apoptosis: evidence for EGF-induced anoikis. J Biol Chem 1999;274:15927–15936PMID : 10336499.
crossref pmid
25. Suzuki A, Kawabata T, Kato M. Necessity of interleukin-1beta converting enzyme cascade in taxotere-initiated death signaling. Eur J Pharmacol 1998;343:87–92PMID : 9551718.
crossref pmid
26. Thornberry NA, Lazebnik Y. Caspases: enemies within. Science 1998;281:1312–1316PMID : 9721091.
crossref pmid
27. Cryns V, Yuan J. The cutting edge: caspases in apoptosis and disease. In: Lockshin RA, Zakeri Z, Tilly JL, eds. When Cells Die: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Apoptosis and Programmed Cell Death. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1998;177–210.

28. Maurya SK, Tewari M, Kumar M, Thakur MK, Shukla HS. Expression pattern of tumor endothelial marker 8 protein in gallbladder carcinomas. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2011;12:507–512PMID : 21545221.
pmid
29. Horvitz HR, Sternberg PW, Greenwald IS, Fixsen W, Ellis HM. Mutations that affect neural cell lineages and cell fates during the development of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 1983;48 Pt 2:453–463PMID : 6586368.
crossref pmid
30. Jänicke RU, Ng P, Sprengart ML, Porter AG. Caspase-3 is required for alpha-fodrin cleavage but dispensable for cleavage of other death substrates in apoptosis. J Biol Chem 1998;273:15540–15545PMID : 9624143.
crossref pmid
31. Yang XH, Sladek TL, Liu X, Butler BR, Froelich CJ, Thor AD. Reconstitution of caspase 3 sensitizes MCF-7 breast cancer cells to doxorubicin- and etoposide-induced apoptosis. Cancer Res 2001;61:348–354PMID : 11196185.
pmid
32. Kwon KB, Park EK, Ryu DG, Park BH. D4-GDI is cleaved by caspase-3 during daunorubicin-induced apoptosis in HL-60 cells. Exp Mol Med 2002;34:32–37PMID : 11989976.
crossref pmid
33. Henkels KM, Turchi JJ. Cisplatin-induced apoptosis proceeds by caspase-3-dependent and -independent pathways in cisplatin-resistant and -sensitive human ovarian cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 1999;59:3077–3083PMID : 10397248.
pmid
34. Blanc C, Deveraux QL, Krajewski S, et al. Caspase-3 is essential for procaspase-9 processing and cisplatin-induced apoptosis of MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 2000;60:4386–4390PMID : 10969782.
pmid
35. Cummings BS, Schnellmann RG. Cisplatin-induced renal cell apoptosis: caspase 3-dependent and -independent pathways. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2002;302:8–17PMID : 12065694.
crossref pmid
36. Kishimoto S, Kawazoe Y, Ikeno M, Fukushima S, Takeuchi Y. Continuous exposure to low-dose cisplatin and apoptosis. Biol Pharm Bull 2005;28:1954–1957PMID : 16204953.
crossref pmid
37. Wong SC, Chan JK, Lee KC, Hsiao WL. Differential expression of p16/p21/p27 and cyclin D1/D3, and their relationships to cell proliferation, apoptosis, and tumour progression in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. J Pathol 2001;194:35–42PMID : 11329139.
crossref pmid
38. Mommers EC, van Diest PJ, Leonhart AM, Meijer CJ, Baak JP. Balance of cell proliferation and apoptosis in breast carcinogenesis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1999;58:163–169PMID : 10674882.
crossref pmid
39. Zhao H, Morimoto T, Sasa M, Tanaka T, Izumi K. Immunohistochemical expression of uPA, PAI-1, cathepsin D and apoptotic cells in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer 2002;9:118–126PMID : 12016391.
crossref pmid
40. Parton M, Krajewski S, Smith I, et al. Coordinate expression of apoptosis-associated proteins in human breast cancer before and during chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:2100–2108PMID : 12114409.
pmid
Figure 1
Expression of procaspase-3 and activated caspase-3 in triple negative and triple positive gallbladder cancer.
kjim-28-573-g001
Figure 2
Expression of procaspase-3 and activated caspase-3 in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, androgen receptor (AR)-positive, and HER/neu-positive gallbladder carcinoma.
aMarks represent significant differences.
kjim-28-573-g002
Editorial Office
101-2501, Lotte Castle President, 109 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2271-6792   Fax: +82-2-790-0993    E-mail: kaim@kams.or.kr
Copyright © 2018 The Korean Association of Internal Medicine. All rights reserved.
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
powerd by m2community