| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us
Korean J Intern Med > Volume 32(3); 2017 > Article
Yi, Lee, Jung, Min, and Youn: Association between left ventricular function and paraprotein type in patients with multiple myeloma

Abstract

Background/Aims

Multiple myeloma (MM)–associated cardiac damage, particularly according to the type of monoclonal (M) protein has not been elucidated. We sought to investigate relationship between elevated serum M protein levels and echocardiographic indices of cardiac structure and function in patients with MM.

Methods

We evaluated a total of 184 consecutive MM patients who underwent echocardiography for bone marrow pre-transplant screening. Serum levels of intact immunoglobulin M protein and free light chain kappa/lambda (FLC-κ/-λ) were measured.

Results

One hundred thirty-nine patients were non-light chain MM (non-LCMM) and 45 patients belonged to LCMM. In patients with non-LCMM, significant correlations were found between serum M protein and left atrial volume index (LAVi; r = 0.720, p < 0.0001), E/e’ (r = 0.511, p < 0.0001), and systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (r = 0.485, p < 0.0001). In patients with LCMM, log-transformed FLC-λ (log-λ) was correlated with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, r = –0.536, p = 0.010), left ventricular (LV) end-systolic dimension (r = 0.500, p = 0.018), and LV end-systolic volume (r = 0.444, p = 0.038). On multivariate analyses, hematocrit and serum M protein were independent predictors of LAVi in patients with non-LCMM. In patient with LCMM, FLC-λ isotype was only found to be an independent determinant of LVEF.

Conclusions

An increase in serum M protein was associated with LV diastolic dysfunction, whereas an increase in serum FLC-λ concentration showed a negative correlation with the echocardiographic parameters of LV systolic function. These findings also suggest that serum M protein has different effects on LV function according to the type of paraproteins in patients with MM.

INTRODUCTION

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a B cell neoplasm characterized by clonal proliferation of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow, and produces excess amounts of monoclonal protein (M protein) including an abnormal immunoglobulin (Ig) fragment or light chain that deposit in organs or tissues [1]. The toxic effects and organ dysfunction caused by M protein deposition differ in severity, clinical presentation, and prognosis from that caused by ‘amyloidogenic’ light chain deposition as seen in primary systemic amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis [2]. In patients with AL amyloidosis, cardiac involvement is well known as the worst prognostic indicator [3]; however, there is not sufficient data regarding the relationship between elevated serum M protein levels and cardiac structure and function in patients with MM. Therefore, we sought to investigate the association of morphologic and functional echocardiographic features with the increased serum concentrations of M protein or free light chains (FLCs) in a population of MM patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.

METHODS

Study population

We reviewed the medical records of 492 adults newly diagnosed with MM at a single institute from April 2003 to February 2013. Patients with primary AL amyloidosis were excluded for this study. Of these, 207 patients who underwent transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) for bone marrow pre-transplant screening constituted the initial study population after induction chemotherapy. Twenty-three of the 207 patients were excluded for the following reasons: moderate or greater degrees of valvular heart disease (n = 1), previous history of coronary artery disease (n = 3) or atrial fibrillation (n = 4), connective tissue disease (n = 2), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 2), renal disease (n = 3), acute infection or sepsis (n = 4), and poor image quality (n = 4). Patient clinical data were initially collected, and laboratory values including serum levels of M protein or FLCs were followed up at the time of echocardiographic examination after completion of induction chemotherapy. Approval for this study was obtained from the Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital Institutional Review Board and the Catholic University of Korea in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki.

Assays for serum M protein and FLC concentration

Patients were assessed for symptomatic MM using the International Myeloma Working Group definition. Patients with non-light chain multiple myeloma (non-LCMM) had a detectable M protein of intact Ig heavy chain type G, A, M, or D and either light chain kappa (κ) or lambda (λ) [4]. Patients with LCMM who did not have intact IgM protein at diagnosis had measurable serum FLCs. The serum FLC-κ and -λ levels were measured using the FREELITE assay (The Binding Site, Birmingham, UK) and κ/λ FLC ratios (FLC-R) were classified as normal (0.26 to 1.65) or abnormal (< 0.26 or > 1.65). Patients with κ/λ FLC-R greater than 1.65 had excess κ-FLC and were presumed to be producing clonal κ-FLC. On the other hand, patients with ratios less than 0.26 had excess λ-FLC and were presumed to be producing λ-FLC [5].

Echocardiography

All ultrasound examinations were performed with a commercially available echocardiographic device (vivid 7, GE, Vingmed Ultrasound AS, Horten, Norway). Standard M-mode, two-dimensional and color Doppler measurements were obtained according to the American Society of Echocardiography recommendations [6]. Left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) were assessed by the biplane modified Simpson’s method from apical four- and two-chamber views. The thickness of the interventricular septum and LV posterior wall and LV chamber dimensions were determined at end-diastole and end-systole from the M-mode at the level of chordae. LV mass was derived by the formula of Devereux and indexed to body surface area (left ventricular mass index [LVMi]). Left atrial (LA) volume was measured at end-systole using the biplane modified Simpson’s rule in the apical four- and two-chamber views, and indexed to body surface area (left atrial volume index [LAVi]). Peak early (E) and late (A) diastolic flow velocities, and E-wave deceleration time (DT) were measured from a pulsed wave Doppler examination of the mitral inflow in the apical four-chamber view. The tissue Doppler-derived peak early (e’) diastolic myocardial velocity measured at the septal and lateral mitral annulus was averaged, and as an index of LV filling pressure, E/e’ was calculated. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) was classified as normal, grade I (impaired relaxation), grade II (pseudonormal LV filling), or grade III (restrictive diastolic physiology) [7]. Right ventricular (RV) dimension and wall thickness were measured at end-diastole from the apical four chamber view and the subcostal view, respectively. RV function was assessed by RV descent, defined as the systolic displacement of the lateral portion of the tricuspid annular plane. Systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (SPAP) was estimated using the modified Bernoulli equation: SPAP = 4v2 (v = peak velocity of tricuspid regurgitation) + estimated right atrial pressure [8]. All echocardiographic examinations were performed by skilled sonographers and interpreted by experienced cardiologists who blinded to the clinical information of the study population.

Statistical methods

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), as medians with interquartile ranges (for biomarkers), or as counts and percentages. The Mann-Whitney U test or Student t test was used to compare continuous variables between groups, and Pearson chi-square test or Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical variables between groups. Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient was used to assess the linear relationship between two variables. Due to their skewed distribution, serum FLC-κ (sFLC-κ) and -λ were log transformed. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to evaluate the independent predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and LAVi, and for all analyses, a two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 18 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

Baseline clinical characteristics and laboratory findings

A total of 184 patients with MM were enrolled in this study. One hundred thirty-nine patients (76%) had non-LCMM and 45 (24%) had LCMM. Patient clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. In the non-LCMM group, 95 (68%) and 34 (25%) of patients had detectable IgG and IgA, respectively, while only six (4%) and four patients (3%) had IgD and IgM, respectively. The proportion of patients with the sFLC-κ isotype was higher than that of the sFLC-λ isotype in patients with non-LCMM as well as LCMM, but the differences were not statistically significant. Both groups had an advanced Durie-Salmon stage III, and β2-microglobulin and lactate dehydrogenase levels were similar between the non-LCMM and LCMM subjects, whereas serum albumin levels were significantly decreased in non-LCMM when compared to LCMM patients at diagnosis. Patients with non-LCMM had lower serum creatinine levels, higher estimated glomerular filtration rate using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels than those with LCMM. sFLC-λ levels were higher in LCMM patients, but sFLC-κ and serum κ/λ FLC-R did not differ significantly between the groups. Although the prevalence rate of smoking was higher in the LCMM group, there were no significant differences between these two groups in age, gender, body mass index, the prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension (HTN), and hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), total cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. Also, there were no significant differences in chemotherapy regimens including high-dose dexamethasone between these two groups, and the maximum cumulative dose of doxorubicin that was used in vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone regimen did not exceed the limited cumulative dose in this population [9].

Echocardiographic characteristics

The time from diagnosis to TTE was similar between non-LCMM and LCMM patients (3.3 ± 2.8 months vs. 3.4 ± 2.8 months, p = 0.768). Patients with non-LCMM were more likely to have lower LVEF and larger left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) compared with LCMM patients. However, there were no significant differences in interventricular septal thickness, LV mass, LA volume, LV diastolic function, and RV chamber size, wall thickness, function and SPAP between the two groups (Table 2).

Echocardiographic correlates of serum M protein and log-transformed serum FLC-κ and -λ

We evaluated correlations between echocardiographic variables and serum levels of M protein, and log-transformed serum FLC-κ/-λ (log-κ/-λ) in patients with non-LCMM and LCMM, respectively (Table 3). In the non-LCMM group, serum M protein showed a weak positive association with left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV; r = 0.169, p = 0.048), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV; r = 0.230, p = 0.007), and LVMi (r = 0.221, p = 0.009). However, a significant positive correlation was found between serum M protein and LAVi (r = 0.720, p < 0.0001), and serum M protein positively correlated with E/e’ ratio (r = 0.511, p < 0.0001). Serum M protein is also correlated significantly with SPAP (r = 0.485, p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1) and A’ velocity (r = 0.321, p < 0.0001). In LCMM patients with sFLC-κ isotype, no echocardiographic variables were associated with log-κ other than SPAP (r = 0.378, p = 0.025) as shown in Table 3. On the other hand, in the sFLC-λ isotype group, log-λ showed a statistically significant negative correlation with LVEF (r = –0.536, p = 0.010) (Fig. 2), and positively correlated with LVESD (r = 0.500, p = 0.018) and LVESV (r = 0.444, p = 0.038). Although the low levels of sFLC-κ and -λ were detected in patients with non-LCMM, they did not show any associations with echocardiographic parameters.
It may be controversial whether decreased serum M protein levels after induction chemotherapy can reflect echocardiographic findings or not, because initial serum levels of M protein and FLC-κ, λ showed a significant decrease after induction chemotherapy in both groups (Supplementary Table 1). Therefore, we reanalyzed the associations between initial serum M protein levels and echocardiographic parameters of LV function. Interestingly, initial serum M protein showed weaker correlations with LAVi (r = 0.202, p = 0.023), E/e’ ratio (r = 0.252, p = 0.005), and SPAP (r = 0.220, p = 0.022) in non-LCMM, whereas there was a stronger relationship between initial log-λ and LVEF (r = –0.668, p = 0.001) in LCMM (Supplementary Table 2).

Independent predictors of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function

In patients with non-LCMM, Hct (β, –0.353; 95% confidence interval [CI], –0.666 to –0.040; p = 0.027) and serum M protein (β, 4.304; 95% CI, 3.404 to 5.204; p < 0.0001) were found to be significant independent determinants of LAVi after adjusting for potential confounders such as age, HTN, LV diastolic function and use of bortezomib. On the other hand, multivariate analysis for LVEF after adjusting HTN, Hb, serum M protein, sFLC isotype and use of bortezomib demonstrated that ESR (β, –0.035; 95% CI, –0.063 to –0.007; p = 0.013) was an independent predictor of LVEF. In patients with LCMM, sFLC-λ isotype (β, –5.340; 95% CI, –7.870 to –2.810; p < 0.0001) was an independent predictor of LVEF after adjusting for other parameters including age, HTN, and use of bortezomib. However, multivariate analysis for LAVi after adjusting age, HTN, use of bortezomib and sFLC-λ isotype revealed that Hct (β, –0.959; 95% CI, –1.773 to –0.144; p = 0.022) was only found to be an independent predictor of LAVi.

DISCUSSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate echocardiographic correlates of the increased serum concentrations of M protein or FLCs in patients with MM. The main findings of the current investigation are as follows: (1) in the non-LCMM group, increased serum M protein was significantly correlated with echocardiographic parameters of LV diastolic function, and Hct and serum M protein contributed to the prediction of LAVi; (2) in the LCMM group, patients with the sFLC-λ isotype showed significant association between log-λ and echocardiographic parameters related to LV systolic function, and sFLC-λ isotype contributed to the prediction of LVEF.

Non-LCMM

Previous studies have reported that monoclonal hypergammoglobulinemia increases serum viscosity, resulting in increase of blood flow resistance combined with expanded plasma volume, and this condition can lead to systemic hypertension, congestive heart failure (CHF), and disturbance of peripheral circulation [10,11]. Although no patients presented with symptomatic hyperviscosity in this study, we found significant positive correlations between serum M protein and LAVi, E/e’ ratio, and SPAP, which are echocardiographic variables reflecting LV filling pressure.
LA enlargement has been proposed as an indicator of diastolic burden and a predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes such as atrial fibrillation, stroke, and CHF [12]. The E/e’ ratio has been also used as a tool for assessing LV filling pressures; however, this Doppler index may be more affected by loading conditions, especially in healthy subjects with preserved EF [13,14]. Considering the clinical conditions of our patients who received frequent blood transfusion or hydration, and that they showed preserved LV systolic function (LVEF > 50%), the E/e’ ratio might not have expressed accurate LV filling pressure, which is the reason why we used LAVi as a surrogate marker of LV diastolic function on multivariate analysis. Nevertheless, the significant relation between serum M protein and E/e’ ratio as well as LAVi strongly suggests that the increase in serum M protein is associated with LVDD.
Symptoms of hyperviscosity have been reported to occur when levels reach 5 g/dL for IgG, 7 g/dL for IgA, and 4 g/dL for IgM; however, little is known about how levels of serum M protein might predict subclinical hemodynamic changes. Somer [15] described that not only an increase in paraprotein concentration, but also their molecular characteristics can contribute to increase of serum viscosity. Earlier experimental studies demonstrated that fibrinogen, a major plasma protein, promotes red blood cell (RBC) aggregation by interaction with erythrocyte membranes, resulting in increase of blood viscosity, and this process usually occurs to a great extent in MM patients with dysfibrinogenemia [16,17]. Furthermore, recently published laboratory studies documented that these hemorheological changes can affect on blood flow resistance via a variety of vascular control mechanisms [18]. In previous reviews of the literatures, Hct has been described as an important determinant of whole blood viscosity, and ESR, a non-specific inflammatory marker, has been also reported to reflect the degree of RBC aggregation [19].
Consistent with aforementioned studies, our results showed that Hct and serum M protein were significant predictors of LAVi. Unexpectedly, Hct showed an inverse relationship with LAVi in both univariate and multivariate analyses, but this result may be due to RBC transfusion or recombinant erythropoietin use for anemia correction.

LCMM

Monoclonal light chain deposits in the myocardium are well known in patients with AL amyloidosis or light chain deposition disease, causing a restrictive infiltrative cardiomyopathy [20,21]. On the other hand, cardiac involvement by non-amyloidotic light chain in MM patients without amyloidosis has only been described in few case reports [22,23]. Although Shustik et al. [24] documented that the group with λ-light chain disease (LCD) had a shorter median survival than the κ-LCD group (10 months vs. 30 months, p < 0.0001), they could not find any significant differences between the two groups in prognostic factors.
In the present study focusing on echocardiographic characteristics of MM, an increase in sFLC-λ was significantly associated with a decrease in LVEF, and sFLC-λ isotype was found to be an independent predictor of LVEF. Ig FLCs are approximately 22 kDa polypeptides, and they may exist as monomers or as dimers with a molecular weight of approximately 44 kDa that is covalently or noncovalently disulfide-linked. FLC-κ are usually monomers, and thus they are filtered three-times faster than FLC-λ that exist as dimers, which is the reason why the serum concentration of FLC-κ is lower than that of FLC-λ despite the higher production of κ light chain in comparison with λ light chain [25]. Therefore, this physiologic characteristic of sFLC-λ that has a relatively long half-life in the blood may contribute the possibility of λ light chain deposition in the myocardium. In this study, the presence of FLCs in the myocardium could not be confirmed through endomyocardial biopsy. However, given the results of previously reported literatures, our findings strongly suggest that the sFLC (especially the sFLC-λ) might be deposited in the myocardium.
Our investigation has several limitations due to its cross-sectional design. First, our patients did not have available initial echocardiographic data, and moreover, induction chemotherapy could affect LV function. Second, FLCs deposition was not confirmed by endomyocardial biopsy, and hemodynamic data was not also verified through right heart catheterization. However, risks related to these invasive procedures limit their routine use in clinical practice. Third, few participants showed significant LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF < 56%, n = 17, 9.2%) as we enrolled patients in relatively good condition who were preparing for autologous stem cell transplantation. Nonetheless, LVDD (≥ grade I) or LA enlargement was found in more than half of the study population, which is clinically important, because in many previous reports, LVDD has been shown to progress to CHF with preserved LVEF [26]. Fourth, newer imaging modalities such as speckle tracking echocardiography or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging were not performed, because typical echocardiographic findings suggestive of severe left ventricular hypertrophy or cardiac dysfunction were not found among study population. Finally, blood viscosity could not be directly measured, and cardiac biomarkers such as N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide or cardiac troponin I were not assessed in this study.
In conclusion, serum M protein has different effects on cardiac function according to the type of paraproteins in patients with MM, not AL amyloidosis. Increase in serum M protein, including an abnormal Ig fragment or light chain is associated with LVDD, raising the possibility of hemodynamic abnormality caused by increased viscosity in patients with non-LCMM. On the other hand, increase of sFLC-λ concentration shows a negative correlation with echocardiographic indices of LV systolic function, suggesting that its deposition may lead to myocardial damage in patients with LCMM. These results suggest that assessment of serum M protein levels can provide useful information about hemodynamic condition and may be helpful to determine treatment choice or drug dose before bone marrow transplantation in patients with MM. The findings of this retrospective study should be validated in the future prospective studies enrolling larger patient populations and with serial echocardiography follow-up.

KEY MESSAGE

1. An increase in serum monoclonal (M) protein was associated with left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction, and an increase in serum free light chain-λ showed an inverse relationship with LV systolic function among patients with multiple myeloma (MM).
2. Serum M protein has different effects on LV function according to the type of paraprotein in patients with MM.

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (A120175).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1.
Changes of serum levels of M protein and free light chain-κ and -λ
kjim-2015-339-supple1.pdf
Supplementary Table 2.
Correlation between echocardiographic variables and initial serum levels of M protein or log-transformed serum free light chain-κ and -λ
kjim-2015-339-supple2.pdf

Figure 1.
Correlation between serum monoclonal (M) protein and left atrial volume index (LAVi), peak early diastolic transmitral velocity to peak early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E/e’), or systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) in non-light chain multiple myeloma patients. Serum M protein showed a significant positive correlation with (A) LAVi, (B) E/e’, or (C) SPAP.
kjim-2015-339f1.tif
Figure 2.
Correlation between left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and log-transformed serum level of kappa (log-κ) or log-transformed serum level of lambda (log-λ) in light chain multiple myeloma patients. (A) Log-κ showed no significant association with LVEF in patients with κ-isotype (n = 23). On the other hand, (B) log-λ showed a statistically significant negative correlation with LVEF in patients with λ-isotype (n = 22). NS, not significant.
kjim-2015-339f2.tif
Table 1.
Baseline clinical characteristics and laboratory findings of study population
Variable Non-LCMM (n = 139) LCMM (n = 45) p value
Age, yr 57.7 ± 9.3 56.3 ± 8.4 0.380
Male sex 69 (49.6) 20 (22.5) 0.544
Body mass index, kg/m2 23.6 ± 2.9 23.8 ± 3.1 0.657
Diabetes mellitus 14 (10.1) 5 (11.1) 0.517
Hypertension 39 (28.1) 14 (31.1) 0.694
Smoking 10 (7.2) 9 (20.0) 0.019
Induction chemotherapy regimens 0.661
 Bortezomib 60 (43.1) 24 (53.3)
 Thalidomide 37 (26.6) 12 (26.6)
 Bortezomib and thalidomide 17 (12.2) 4 (2.2)
 Lenalidomide 2 (1.4) 0
 High-dose dexamethasone 23 (16.5) 5 (11.1)
Ig heavy chain isotype, G/A/D/M 95/34/6/4 -
Ig free light chain isotype 0.449
 κ Type 80 (57.6) 23 (51.1)
 λ Type 59 (42.4) 22 (48.9)
Durie-Salmon stagea 0.055
 I 3 (2.2) 0
 II 18 (13.0) 1 (2.2)
 III 117 (84.8) 44 (97.8)
β2-Microglobulin, mg/La 3.5 (2.6–6.4) 5.3 (2.5–11.2) 0.076
Albumin, g/dLa 3.2 (2.8–3.7) 3.9 (3.5–4.4) < 0.0001
Lactate dehydrogenase, U/La 339 (264–470) 409 (342–572) 0.445
Hemoglobin, g/dL 11.1 (9.9–11.8) 10.4 (9.7–11.3) 0.161
Hematocrit, % 33.1 (29.7–35.3) 31.4 (29.9–34.2) 0.211
Serum creatinine, g/dL 0.7 (0.6–0.9) 0.9 (0.7–1.8) 0.032
eGFRMDRD, mL/min/1.73 m2 98.6 (77.6–120.6) 69.9 (32.6–110.9) 0.021
ESR, mm/hr 32.0 (14.5–61.0) 19.0 (9.5–34.2) 0.015
Total cholesterol, mg/dL 170 (145–202) 159 (135–189) 0.404
Triglyceride, mg/dL 131 (85–181) 130 (101–185) 0.680
Serum M protein, g/dL 0.23 (0.01–1.11) -
Serum FLC-κ, mg/dL 15.8 (9.0–31.3) 21.1 (10.3–87.4) 0.066
Serum FLC-λ, mg/dL 12.0 (7.3–20.7) 15.0 (8.8–166.8) 0.049
Serum κ/λ FLC-R 1.25 (0.75–3.58) 1.20 (0.10–5.03) 0.511

Values are presented as mean ± SD, number (%), or median (interquartile range).

LCMM, light chain multiple myeloma; Ig, immunoglobulin; eGFRMDRD, estimated glomerular filtration rate using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; FLC, free light chain; FLC-R, free light chain ratio.

a At diagnosis.

Table 2.
Echocardiographic parameters of the study population
Variable Non-LCMM (n = 139) LCMM (n = 45) p value
LVEF, % 61.1 ± 5.1 64.2 ± 4.9 < 0.0001
IVS, mm 9.6 ± 1.6 9.8 ± 2.1 0.498
LVEDD, mm 49.2 ± 5.4 47.4 ± 5.4 0.061
LVESD, mm 30.7 ± 5.0 27.9 ± 5.3 0.002
LVEDV, mL 79.8 ± 24.9 78.5 ± 21.6 0.748
LVESV, mL 31.7 ± 13.4 28.6 ± 11.0 0.160
LVMi, g/m2 105.5 ± 24.5 107.4 ± 37.9 0.745
LAVi, mL/m2 29.1 ± 10.9 29.6 ± 11.7 0.804
E, cm/sec 63.0 ± 18.4 66.8 ± 20.9 0.244
A, cm/sec 76.1 ± 18.8 73.7 ± 19.1 0.462
E/A 0.8 ± 0.3 0.9 ± 0.4 0.129
DT, msec 214 ± 48 212 ± 52 0.761
E/e’ 9.4 ± 3.1 10.3 ± 3.7 0.133
A’, cm/sec 9.9 ± 2.7 9.9 ± 2.1 0.900
LVDD grade 0.057
 Normal 20 (14.8) 11 (25.6)
 GI 112 (83.0) 29 (67.4)
 GII 3 (2.2) 3 (7.0)
RVDd, mm 32.7 (30.2–34.9) 32.4 (29.4–34.5) 0.696
RVWT, mm 3.9 (3.4–4.5) 4.1 (3.5–4.7) 0.241
TAPSE, mm 22.8 ± 3.8 23.0 ± 4.3 0.918
SPAP, mmHg 27.1 ± 6.9 29.7 ± 10.6 0.157

Values are presented as mean ± SD, number (%), or median (interquartile range).

LCMM, light chain multiple myeloma; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; IVS, interventricular septal thickness; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic diameter; LVEDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVESV, left ventricular end-systolic volume; LVMi, left ventricular mass index; LAVi, left atrial volume index; DT, deceleration time; E/e’, peak early diastolic transmitral velocity to peak early diastolic mitral annular velocity; LVDD, left ventricular diastolic dysfunction; RVDd, right ventricular end-diastolic diameter; RVWT, right ventricular wall thickness; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; SPAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure.

Table 3.
Correlation between echocardiographic parameters and serum levels of monoclonal protein and log-transformed serum free light chains in the study population
Variable Non-LCMM
LCMM
M protein (n = 139)
Log-κ (n = 23)
Log-λ (n = 22)
r p value r p value r p value
LVEF, % –0.130 - 0.383 - –0.536 0.010
IVS, mm 0.164 - 0.214 - 0.301 -
LVEDD, mm 0.038 - 0.111 - 0.318 -
LVESD, mm 0.095 - 0.079 - 0.500 0.018
LVEDV, mL 0.169 0.048 0.143 - 0.301 -
LVESV, mL 0.230 0.007 0.059 - 0.444 0.038
LVMi, g/m2 0.221 0.009 0.194 - 0.378 -
LAVi, mL/m2 0.720 < 0.0001 0.170 - 0.366 -
E, cm/sec 0.132 - 0.265 - 0.414 -
A, cm/ec 0.321 < 0.0001 0.077 - 0.256 -
E/A –0.169 - 0.237 - 0.310 -
DT, msec 0.036 - –0.402 - –0.043 -
E/e’ 0.511 < 0.0001 0.200 - 0.042 -
A’, cm/sec 0.067 - –0.218 - –0.137 -
RVDd, mm 0.021 - 0.218 - 0.111 -
RVWT, mm 0.051 - 0.128 - 0.223 -
TAPSE, mm –0.005 - 0.071 - –0.231 -
SPAP, mmHg 0.485 < 0.0001 0.378 0.025 0.242 -

LCMM, light chain multiple myeloma; Log-κ, log-transformed serum level of kappa; Log-λ, log-transformed serum level of lambda; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; IVS, interventricular septal thickness; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic diameter; LVEDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVESV, left ventricular end-systolic volume; LVMi, left ventricular mass index; LAVi, left atrial volume index; DT, deceleration time; E/e’, peak early diastolic transmitral velocity to peak early diastolic mitral annular velocity; RVDd, right ventricular end-diastolic diameter; RVWT, right ventricular wall thickness; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; SPAP, systolic pulmonary artery pressure.

REFERENCES

1. Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1860–1873.
crossref pmid
2. Rajkumar SV, Gertz MA, Kyle RA. Primary systemic amyloidosis with delayed progression to multiple myeloma. Cancer 1998;82:1501–1505.
crossref pmid
3. Cueto-Garcia L, Reeder GS, Kyle RA, et al. Echocardiographic findings in systemic amyloidosis: spectrum of cardiac involvement and relation to survival. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985;6:737–743.
crossref pmid
4. International Myeloma Working Group. Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br J Haematol 2003;121:749–757.
crossref pmid
5. Dispenzieri A, Kyle R, Merlini G, et al. International Myeloma Working Group guidelines for serum-free light chain analysis in multiple myeloma and related disorders. Leukemia 2009;23:215–224.
crossref pmid
6. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18:1440–1463.
crossref pmid
7. Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22:107–133.
crossref pmid
8. Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010;23:685–713.
crossref pmid
9. Swain SM, Whaley FS, Ewer MS. Congestive heart failure in patients treated with doxorubicin: a retrospective analysis of three trials. Cancer 2003;97:2869–2879.
crossref pmid
10. Russell JA, Powles RL. The relationship between serum viscosity, hypervolaemia and clinical manifestations associated with circulating paraprotein. Br J Haematol 1978;39:163–175.
crossref pmid
11. Mehta J, Singhal S. Hyperviscosity syndrome in plasma cell dyscrasias. Semin Thromb Hemost 2003;29:467–471.
crossref pmid
12. Abhayaratna WP, Seward JB, Appleton CP, et al. Left atrial size: physiologic determinants and clinical applications. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:2357–2363.
crossref pmid
13. Ommen SR, Nishimura RA, Appleton CP, et al. Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures: a comparative simultaneous Doppler-catheterization study. Circulation 2000;102:1788–1794.
crossref pmid
14. Firstenberg MS, Levine BD, Garcia MJ, et al. Relationship of echocardiographic indices to pulmonary capillary wedge pressures in healthy volunteers. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1664–1669.
crossref pmid
15. Somer T. Rheology of paraproteinaemias and the plasma hyperviscosity syndrome. Baillieres Clin Haematol 1987;1:695–723.
crossref pmid
16. Carr ME Jr, Zekert SL. Abnormal clot retraction, altered fibrin structure, and normal platelet function in multiple myeloma. Am J Physiol 1994;266(3 Pt 2):H1195–H1201.
pmid
17. Morsdorf S, Jung F, Seyfert UT, Mrowietz C, Pindur G, Wenzel E. Haemostatical and rheological aspects of dysfibrinogenemia. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 1997;17:13–19.
pmid
18. Baskurt OK, Yalcin O, Meiselman HJ. Hemorheology and vascular control mechanisms. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2004;30:169–178.
pmid
19. Baskurt OK, Meiselman HJ. Blood rheology and hemodynamics. Semin Thromb Hemost 2003;29:435–450.
crossref pmid
20. Liao R, Jain M, Teller P, et al. Infusion of light chains from patients with cardiac amyloidosis causes diastolic dysfunction in isolated mouse hearts. Circulation 2001;104:1594–1597.
pmid
21. Jimenez-Zepeda VH. Light chain deposition disease: novel biological insights and treatment advances. Int J Lab Hematol 2012;34:347–355.
crossref pmid
22. Schattner A, Epstein M, Berrebi A, Caspi A. Case report: multiple myeloma presenting as a diastolic heart failure with no evidence of amyloidosis. Am J Med Sci 1995;310:256–257.
pmid
23. Garton MJ, Walton S, Ewen SW. Systemic lambda lightchain deposition presenting with predominant cardiac involvement. Postgrad Med J 1993;69:588–591.
crossref pmid pmc
24. Shustik C, Bergsagel DE, Pruzanski W. Kappa and lambda light chain disease: survival rates and clinical manifestations. Blood 1976;48:41–51.
pmid
25. Ozsan GH, Dispenzieri A. Serum free light chain analysis in multiple myeloma and plasma cell dyscrasias. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2011;7:65–73.
crossref pmid
26. Wan SH, Vogel MW, Chen HH. Pre-clinical diastolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:407–416.
crossref pmid
TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
PubReader  PubReader
ePub Link  ePub Link
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
CrossRef TDM  CrossRef TDM
Supplement  Supplement 1
Supplement  Supplement 2
  E-Mail
Share:      
METRICS
2
Crossref
0
Scopus
2,042
View
37
Download
Related articles
The relationship between anti-C-reactive protein and disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus  
Effect of anemia correction on left ventricular structure and filling pressure in anemic patients without overt heart disease  2014 July;29(4)
Associations between Hemoglobin Concentrations and the Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes  2012 September;27(3)
Alteration of Left Ventricular Function with Dobutamine Challenge in Patients with Myocardial Bridge  2011 December;26(4)
Relationship between serum brain natriuretic peptide and heart function in patients with chronic kidney disease  2008 December;23(4)
Editorial Office
101-2501, Lotte Castle President, 109 Mapo-daero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Korea
Tel: +82-2-793-4364, 4311   Fax: +82-2-790-0993    E-mail: kaim@kams.or.kr
Copyright © 2017 The Korean Association of Internal Medicine. All rights reserved.
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
powerd by m2community